Abstract
The niche of forensic neuropsychology and use of neuropsychologists as expert witnesses has proliferated over the past two decades. Neuropsychologists conduct evaluations or provide consultation to assist triers of fact in both civil and criminal arenas. This article delivers a succinct overview of an array of factors that warrant consideration from the time of referral for a neuropsychological evaluation through the delivery of a verdict or settlement and receipt of payment for services. Readers are offered a primer on relevant legal criteria, distinctions between court settings, and applicable ethical standards and guidelines. Suggestions are made regarding the expert witness retention agreement and strategies for direct and cross examination are reviewed. Logistical and liability considerations are also explored. Real world examples are included to illustrate some of the obstacles that neuropsychologist expert witnesses may encounter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Judicature Society. (2012). Juries in-depth: Jury decision making. Retrieved December 19, 2012 from http://www.ajs.org/jc/juries/jc_decision_overview.asp
American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.
American Psychological Association (2010). 2010 Amendments to the 2002 “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”. American Psychologist, 65(5), 493.
American Psychological Association (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19. doi:10.1037/a0029889
Babitsky, S. & Mangraviti, J. J. (2012). How to be an effective expert witness. Falmouth, MA: SEAK.
Babitsky, S., Mangraviti, J. J. & Babitsky, A. (2006). The A–Z guide to expert witnessing. Falmouth, MA: SEAK.
Barth, J. T., Ryan, T. V. & Hawk, G. L. (1991). Forensic neuropsychology: A reply to the method skeptics. Neuropsychology Review, 2(3), 251–266.
Brodsky, S. L. (1991). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brodsky, S. L. (2013). Testifying in court; Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bush, S. S., Connell, M. A. & Denney, R. L. (2006). Ethical issues in forensic psychology: A systematic model for decision making. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
Canadian Psychological Association (2000) Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists, 3rd Ed. Ottawa, Ontario: Author
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).
Deidan, C. & Bush, S. (2002). Addressing perceived ethical violations by colleagues. In S. S. Bush & M. L. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology (pp. 281–305). Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Denney, R. L. & Sullivan, J. P. (2008). Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford.
Faust, D. (2011). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Federal rules of evidence, 28, U.S.C. (West, 1975).
Federal rules of evidence, 702 (2011).
Frye v. United States, 292 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 118 S. Ct. 512 (1997).
Greiffenstein, M. F. & Cohen, L. (2005). Neuropsychology and the law: Principles of productive attorney-neuropsychologist relations. In G. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (pp. 29–91). New York: Oxford University Press.
Heilbronner, R. (2008). Neuropsychology in the courtroom: Expert analysis of reports and testimony. New York: Guilford.
Horton, A. M., Jr. & Hartlage, L. C. (2010). Handbook of forensic neuropsychology. New York: Springer.
Jenkins v. United States, 307F.2d 637 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Kaufmann, P. M. (2009). Neuropsychological practice and forensic consulting: Cases, controversies, and legal authority. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23 (4), 556. CE Workshop Presented at the 7th Annual AACN Conference, San Diego, CA.
Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999).
Larrabee, G. L. (Ed.). (2005). Forensic neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Larrabee, G. L. (Ed.). (2012). Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lees-Haley, P. R. & Cohen, L. J. (1999). The neuropsychologist as expert witness: Toward credible science in the courtroom. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice (pp. 443–468). Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D. & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Martelli, M.F., Zasler, N.D., & Johnson-Greene, D. (2001). Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation. In R.D.
Martelli, M. F., Bush, S. S. & Zasler, N. D. (2003). Identifying, avoiding, and addressing ethical misconduct in neuropsychological medicolegal practice. The International Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1, 1–17.
McCaffrey, R. J., Williams, A. D., Fisher, J. M. & Laing, L. C. (2004). The practice of forensic neuropsychology: Meeting challenges in the courtroom. New York: Springer-Verlag, LLC.
McSweeny, A. J. (1997). Regarding ethics in neuropsychological consultation: A comment on Guilmette and Hagan. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 291–293.
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G. & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
O’Conner, M. & Krauss, D. (2001). Legal update: New developments in Rule 702. APLS News, 21(1–4), 18.
Ruff, R. M. (2009). Best practice guidelines for forensic neuropsychological examinations of patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24, 131–140.
Sweet, J. J., Meyer, D. G., Nelson, N. W. & Moberg, P. J. (2011). The TCN/AACN 2010 “Salary Survey”: Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(1), 12–61.
Sweet, J. J., Moberg, P. J. & Suchy, Y. (2000). Ten-Year follow-up survey of clinical neuropsychologists: Part I. Practices and beliefs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 18–37.
Sweet, J. J. & Moulthrop, M. A. (1999). Self-examination questions as a means of identifying bias in adversarial assessments. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1(1), 73–88.
van Gorp, W. & McMullen, W. (1997). Potential sources of bias in forensic neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 180–187.
Woody, R. H. (2011). Letters of protection: Ethical and legal financial considerations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(4), 361–367.
Young, S., Kopelman, M. & Gudjonsson, G. (2009). Forensic neuropsychology in practice: A guide to assessment and legal processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, P.M., Tussey, C.M. The Neuropsychologist as Expert Witness: Testimony in Civil and Criminal Settings. Psychol. Inj. and Law 6, 63–74 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9148-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9148-9