Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of Response Bias in Applied Assessment: Comment on McGrath et al. (2010)

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J. & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., Boik, R. J. & Pierce, C. A. (2001). A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effects of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 291–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, D. D., McGrath, R. E., Pogge, D. L. & Khadivi, A. (2003). A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(2), 197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Elbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, D.K., & Zickar, M.J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods

  • Edens, J. F., Poythress, N. G. & Watkins-Clay, M. M. (2007). Detection of malingering in psychiatric unit and general population prison inmates: A comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 33–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, J. F. & Ruiz, M. A. (2006). On the validity of validity scales: The importance of defensive responding in the prediction of institutional misconduct. Psychological Assessment, 18, 220–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, J. E. & Ruiz, M. A. (2009). Predicting institutional aggression by defensive prison Inmates: An examination of the Personality Assessment Inventory treatment consideration scales. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8(3), 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (1995). Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, S. W. & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 112–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J. & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K. & Turrisi, R. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2012). Moderation. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm

  • Kraemer, H. C., Kiernan, M., Essex, M. & Kupfer, D. J. (2008). How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology, 27, S101–S108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowmaster, S. E. & Morey, L. C. (2012). Predicting law enforcement officer job performance with the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3), 254–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. H. & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H. & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

  • Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

  • Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality assessment inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. H., Sherman, J. D. & Mansfield, E. R. (1986). Failures to detect moderating effects with ordinary least squares-moderated multiple regression: Some reasons and a remedy. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 282–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C., Quigley, B. D., Sanislow, C. A., Skodol, A. E., McGlashan, T. H., Shea, M. T., . . . Gunderson, J. G. (2002). Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 583–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Cruise, K. R., Wang, E. W. & Ustad, K. L. (1998). The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings. Assessment, 5, 399–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Morey, L. C. & Ustad, K. L. (1996). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 629–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, M. L., Larrabee, G. J., Greiffenstein, M. F., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Lees-Haley, P., Green, P. & Greve, K. W. (2011). A misleading review of response bias: Comment on McGrath, Mitchell, Kim, and Hough (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 708–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, W. U., Zehner, S. N., Davis, R. D., Rostow, C. & DeCoster-Martin, E. (2005). Problematic police performance and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 19, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A. & McClelland, G. H. (2005). Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 111–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Wong, S. C. P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedeck, S. (1971). Problems with the use of “moderator” variables. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie C. Morey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morey, L.C. Detection of Response Bias in Applied Assessment: Comment on McGrath et al. (2010). Psychol. Inj. and Law 5, 153–161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-012-9131-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-012-9131-x

Keywords

Navigation