Abstract
This commentary focuses on the proposed changes to the trauma stressor criterion for PTSD for DSM-5, specifically its likely impact on malingering. PTSD is particularly susceptible to malingering because the diagnosis relies so heavily on a patient’s subjective symptoms. Because the traumatic event that is the trigger of the PTSD syndrome is generally based on objective fact and thus often easily corroborated, this element of the diagnosis is usually more challenging to malinger than subjective reports of symptoms. Therefore, one of the main gateways for limiting the misuse of the PTSD diagnosis in forensic settings is the criterion defining the range of qualifying traumas. Proposed changes to criterion A of PTSD in the draft include modifying the types of qualifying trauma by replacing “threat to physical integrity” with “sexual violation,” and clarifying the modes of exposure by replacing the phrase “confronted with” with two criterion: “learning that the event occurred to a close relative or close friend” and “experiencing repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of the event.” Each of these changes has the potential to significantly broaden the range of qualifying stressors and consequently expand the potential pool of individuals who might be in a position to malinger the disorder. Given the likelihood that the DSM-5 field trials will be unable to provide information relevant to assessing the impact of making these changes in forensic settings, it would be prudent to resist the inclination to tinker with the wording unless other mechanisms are available to ensure that the wording changes do more good than harm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Arehart-Treichel, J. (2010). DSM-5 work groups assess thousands of comments. Psychiatric News, 45(26), 14.
Blanchard, E. B., Hickling, E. J., Taylor, A. E., & Loos, W. (1995). Psychiatric morbidity associated with motor vehicle accidents. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 183, 495–504.
Breslau, N., & Kessler, R. C. (2001). The stressor criterion in DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder: an empirical evaluation. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 699–704.
Breslau, N., Kessler, R. C., Chilcoat, H. D., Schultz, L. R., Davis, G. C., & Andreski, P. (1998). Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: the 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 626–632.
First, M. B. (2011). DSM-5 proposals for mood disorders: a cost-benefit analysis. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24(1), 1–9.
Frances, A. (2010). Opening Pandora’s box: The 19 worst suggestions for DSM5 (February 11, 2010). Psychiatric Times (February 11, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dsm/content/article/10168/1522341
Frueh, B. C., Hamner, M. B., Cahil, S. P., Gold, P. B., & Hamlin, K. L. (2000). Apparent symptom overreporting in combat veterans evaluated for PTSD. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 853–885.
Guriel, J., & Fremouw, W. (2003). Assessing malingered posttraumatic stress disorder: a critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 881–904.
Hall, R. C. W., & Hall, R. C. W. (2007). Detection of malingered PTSD: on overview of clinical, psychometric, and physiological assessment: where do we stand? Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52, 717–725.
Kraemer, H., Kupfer, D., Narrow, W., Clarke, D., & Regier, D. A. (2010). Moving toward DSM-5: the field trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1158–1160.
Lees-Haley, P. R. (1997). MMPI-2 base rates for 492 personal injury plaintiffs: implications and challenges for forensic assessment. Journal of Clinincal Psychology, 53, 745–755.
McNally, R. (2003). Progress and controversy in the study of posttraumatic stress disorder. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 229–252.
Resnick, P. (1997). Malingering of posttraumatic disorders. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 130–152). New York: Guilford Press.
Spitzer, R., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1975). Clinical criteria for psychiatric diagnosis and DSM-III. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1187–1192.
Taylor, S., Frueh, B. C., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2007). Detection and management of malingering in people presenting for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: methods, obstacles, and recommendations. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 23–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author is the editor of the DSM-IV-TR.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
First, M.B. The PTSD Stressor Criterion as a Barrier to Malingering: DSM-5 Draft Commentaries. Psychol. Inj. and Law 3, 255–259 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-010-9096-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-010-9096-6