Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological Injury and Law: Introduction to the First Issue

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this introductory article to the special series of articles written to initiate the new journal, Psychological Injury and Law, I provide the background and impetus for this fast-growing area as a distinct field of scientific study. Professionals working in the area need to be aware of its diverse components, from evidence law and forensic psychology to disability and assessment, to its three core areas of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and other distress, chronic pain, and traumatic brain injury, as well as issues such as malingering. I provide summaries of the articles in this special series that appear in this inaugural issue. The remaining articles of the special series of articles to introduce the journal are presented in the next two issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, M. J., & Kane, A. W. (1998). Psychological experts in personal injury actions (3rd ed.). New York: Aspen Law and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (text rev.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., & Hickling, E. J. (1997). After the crash: Assessment and treatment of motor vehicle accident survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., & Hickling, E. J. (2004). After the crash: Psychological assessment and treatment of survivors of motor vehicle accidents (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N. (1999). A beginner’s guide to the MMPI-2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory: Manual for administration and scoring (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, L. (Ed.) (1993). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, L., & Andersson, G. B. J. (Eds.) (2001). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).

  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D. C. Cir. 1923).

  • Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 581–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J., & Turk, D. C. (Eds.) (1999). Psychosocial factors in pain: Critical perspectives. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J., & Weisberg, J. N. (Eds.) (2000). Personality characteristics of patients with pain. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Electric Company v. Joiner, 118 S. Ct. 512 (1997).

  • Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Green, P. (2007). Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 14, 196–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hickling, E. J., & Blanchard, E. B. (Eds.) (1999). The international handbook of road traffic accidents and psychological trauma: Current understanding, treatment and law. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, W. J., Douglas, K. S., Nicholls, T. L., & O’Neill, M. L. (2006). Psychological injuries: Forensic assessment, treatment, and law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, No. 97–1709. (U.S., March 23, 1999).

  • Melzack, R. (1999). Pain and stress: A new perspective. In R. J. Gatchel, & D. C. Turk (Eds.), Psychosocial factors in pain: Critical perspectives (pp. 89–106). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 150, 971–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, K. (2000a). Pain, cognition and traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 14, 95–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, K. (2000b). At the crossroads: Pain in the 21st century. NeuroRehabilitation, 14, 57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne-James, J., Byard, R., Corey, T., & Henderson, C. (Eds.) (2004). Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier (4 vols.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, K. S., Butcher, J. N., & Seelen, J. (2000). The MMPI, MMPI-2, & MMPI-A in court: A practical guide for expert witnesses and attorneys (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (Ed.) (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, B. D., & Shuman, D. W. (Eds.) (1996). Law, mental health, and mental disorder. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Brady, D. O. (Eds.) (2003). Psychological injuries at trial. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Gatchel, R. J. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, D. W., & Hardy, J. L. (2007). Causation, psychology, and law. In G. Young, A. W. Kane, & K. Nicholson (Eds.), Causality of psychological injuries: Presenting evidence in court (pp. 517–548). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, D. W., & Sales, B. D. (1998). The admissibility of expert testimony based on clinical judgment and scientific research. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 4, 1226–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, D. W., & Sales, B. D. (1999). Daubert and behavioral and social science evidence: One case but many meanings. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingering neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545–561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. L. (Ed.) (1999). Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). TOMM: The Test of Memory Malingering. North Tonawanda, NY: MultiHealth Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varney, N. R., & Roberts, R. J. (Eds.) (1999). The evaluation and treatment of mild traumatic brain injury. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., Kane, A. W., & Nicholson, K. (Eds.) (2006). Psychological knowledge in court: PTSD, pain, and TBI. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., Kane, A. W., & Nicholson, K. (2007). Causality of psychological injuries: Presenting evidence in court. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Steven Taylor, Gordon Asmundson, and Izabela Schultz for their helpful comments on the text, and to Jessica Chan for typing the references. The author’s work has been supported by course leaves granted by both Glendon College and York University and editorial grants from Springer Science + Business Media.

Conflict of interest

In terms of possible conflicts of interest, the author has obtained most of his attorney referrals and psycholegal referrals from plaintiff rather than defense attorneys and assessment companies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, G. Psychological Injury and Law: Introduction to the First Issue. Psychol. Inj. and Law 1, 7–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-008-9004-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-008-9004-5

Navigation