Skip to main content
Log in

The potential of rubber materials as an inhibitor to suppress jet formation of the shaped charge warhead

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, as a measure to protect shaped charge, NBR whch is a hyperelastic material, was considered as a target material into which a shaped charge warhead having relatively high speed was impacted. During impact, to what extent NBR can infiltrate into the liner cavity of shaped charge was numerically investigated. The Ogden model combined with the relaxation modulus for NBR was applied in LS-DYNA analysis for the collision between shaped charge and NBR. As a result, the maximum infiltration depth by NBR into the liner cavity was investigated upon the shaped charge stop. The inhibitory effect of the infiltration depth by NBR on jet formation was examined through numerical simulation for jet formation using 2D axisymmetric ALE technique. It was verified from the flash X-ray experiment where a silicone rubber having similar hardness with NBR was used as an inhibitor against jet formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. P. Walters and J. A. Zukas, Fundamentals of Shaped Charges, John Wiley & Sons, USA (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Merendino, J. M. Regan and S. Kronman, A Method of Obtaining a Massive Hypervelocity Pellet From a Shaped Charge Jet, Ballistic Research Laboratories, USA (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Walker, D. J. Grosch and S. A. Mullin, A hypervelocity fragment launcher based on an inhibited shaped charge, Int. J. Impact Engng., 14 (1993) 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Katayama and S. Kibe, Numerical study of the conical shaped charge for space debris impact, Int. J. Impact Engng., 26 (2001) 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Joo and J. Choi, The inhibitor effect on the shaped charge jet penetration, J. Mechanical Science and Technology, 34 (11) (2020) 4685–4694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MARC Analysis Research Corporation, Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers, MARC Analysis Research Corporation, Palo Alto, USA (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Mooney, Theory of large elastic deformation, J. Applied Physics, 11 (1940) 582–592.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. S. Rivlin and D. W. Saunders, Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials VII. Experiments on the deformation of rubber, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 243 (865) (1951) 251–288.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. C. Valanis and R. F. Landel, The strain-energy function of a hyperelastic material in terms of the extension ratios, J. Applied Physics, 38 (7) (1967) 2997–3002.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. W. Ogden, Large deformation isotropic elasticity - on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids, Proceedings of the Royal Society A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 326 (1567) (1972) 565–594.

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. Ogden, G. Saccomandi and I. Sgura, Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data, Computational Mechanics, 34 (2004) 484–502.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. C. Drucker, A Definition of Stable Inelastic Material, Brown University, Rhode Island, USA (1957).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. DS Simulia, 4.6.2 Fitting of hyperelastic and hyperfoam constants, ABAQUS Theory Manual (v6.6), DS Simulia, https://classes.engineering.wustl.edu/2009/spring/mase5513/abaqus/docs/v6.6/books/stm/default.htm?startat=ch04s06ath124.html.

  14. MATLAB Fundamentals, MathWorks Training Services, The MathWorks, Inc. (2017).

  15. Dassault Systemes Corp., Abaqus 6.11 Abaqus/CAE User’s Manual, Dassault Systemes Corp., Providence, RI, USA (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Lee, M. Ki and B. Park, Comparative study on the nonlinear material model of hyperelastic material due to variations in the stretch ratio, J. Ocean Engineering and Technology, 32 (4) (2018) 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. D. Ferry, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, USA (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. W. Tschoegl, The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. T. M. Alejandro, L. L. Edmundo and D. Mariamne, Prony series calculation for visocoelastic behavior modeling of structural adhesives from DMA data, Ingenieria Investigacion Y Tecnologia, 21 (2) (2020) 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual (LS-DYNA R11), Livermore Software Technology Corporation (2018).

  21. G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 21 (1) (1985) 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Agmell, A. Ahadi and J. Stahl, The link between plasticity parameters and process parameters in orthogonal cutting, Procedia CIRP, 8 (2013) 224–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Souli, L. Olovsson and I. Do, ALE and fluid-structure interaction capabilities in LS-DYNA, 7th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Detroit, USA (2002).

  24. D. Cardoso and F. Teixeira-Dias, Modelling the formation of explosively formed projectiles, Int. J. Impact Engng., 93 (2016) 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. E. Anderson, Jr., D. L. Orphal, R. R. Franzen and J. D. Walker, On the hydrodynamic approximation for long-rod penetration, Int. J. Impact Engng., 22 (1999) 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Alia and M. Souli, High explosive simulation using multimaterial formulations, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26 (2006) 1032–1042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. DOW Chemical Company, Silastic™ RTV-4130-J Liquid Silicone Rubber Kit, DOW Chemical Company, USA (2017) 95-1078-01A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Agency for Defense Development Grant funded by the Korean Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Whan Yoon.

Additional information

Jaehyun Joo received M.S. from Department of Aeronautical Engineering of Inha University, Incheon, Korea and has been working at Ground Technology Research Institute of Agency for Defense Development (ADD). He is also a Ph.D. student of Department of Mechanical Engineering in KAIST. His research interests include high velocity impact experiment and numerical simulation.

Jeong Whan Yoon is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, Republic of Korea. He received his Ph.D. degree at Department of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST in 1997. His research interests include high reliability design and manufacturing for lightweight materials and structures. He is in charge of High Speed Mechanical Properties Data Center at KAIST. He is an Associate Editor of International Journal of Plasticity and is a fellow of The Korean Academy of Science and Technology. His H-index is 56 with over 12000 citations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joo, J., Yoon, J.W. The potential of rubber materials as an inhibitor to suppress jet formation of the shaped charge warhead. J Mech Sci Technol 38, 1329–1340 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0227-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0227-5

Keywords

Navigation