Skip to main content
Log in

Design and vibration reduction performance of honeycomb sandwich support rod for wind tunnel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the support structure of wind tunnel tests, a honeycomb sandwich structure is used to embed the wind tunnel tail brace to form a honeycole test process. Using Rayleigh beam theory and equivalent method, the lateral bending dynamic model of the support rod is solved and the natural frequency expression of the lateral bending vibration of the support rod is obtained. Taking the static strength of the support rod as the optimization design objective, the honeycomb sandwich structure was quantitatively described and the optimal design scheme was obtained through orthogonal experiments. The simulation and calculation results of the proposed support and hollow support are verified and compared with each other. The error between the first three natural frequencies of the honeycomb sandwich support given in this article and the simulation results is less than 9.52 %, which proves that the calculation results are relatively accurate. On the premise of meeting the constraints and load requirements, the low order resonant deformation of the transient dynamics simulation analysis is reduced by 30.27 %, significantly improving the vibration damping ability of the wind tunnel support system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Yu, X. H. Yang, X. P. Kou, K. C. Zeng and B. B. Lv, Experiment on active vibration reduction system for transonic wind tunnel model, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 51(4) (2019) 526–533.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. P. Young, Jr, T. G. Popernack, Jr and B. Gloss, National transonic facility model and model support vibration problems, 16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conference, Seattle, USA (1990).

  3. E. John, National transonic facility model and tunnel vibrations, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA (1997).

  4. J. Pan, Optimal design and analysis verification of constrained damping wind tunnel struts, Master’s Thesis, Shandong University, China (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. X. Yang, Design of high angle of attack tensioning and tail bracing combined support equipment, Mechanical Engineer (7) (2005) 113–114.

  6. J. J. Gao and R. S. Jiao, Development of mounting forks system in FL-8 low speed wind tunnel, Experimental Fluid Mechanics, 25(6) (2011) 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. J. Li, Q. S. Yang and R. Fang, Crushing performances of Kirigami modified honeycomb structure in three axial directions, Thin-Walled Structures, 160 (2021) 107365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ashab, D. Ruan and G. X. Lu, Combined compression-shear behavior of aluminum honeycombs, Key Engineering Materials, 626 (2014) 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, UK (1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Aktay, A. F. Johnson and B.-H. Kröplin, Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75(9) (2008) 2616–2630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. H. Fu and J. R. Yin, Equivalent elastic parameters of honeycomb core layer, Journal of Mechanics, 31(1) (1999) 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. X. Shen, Design and optimization of honeycomb curved sandwich structure engine hood, Master’s Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, China (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. F. Xu and W. X. Yao, Fatigue life model for honeycomb sandwich structures, Mechanical Strength, 43(2) (2021) 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Lu, Z. J. Lu, M. Yan, C. J. Liu and Y. X. Xiong, Study on energy absorption and impact stability of series honeycomb, Journal of Central South University, 48(7) (2017) 1951–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Su, J. D. Wu and Y. L. Liu, Research progress in the elasticity and impact resistance of honeycomb structural mechanics metamaterials, Materials Engineering, 47(8) (2019) 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Jaafar, M. Nouari and H. Makich, 3D numerical modeling and experimental validation of machining Nomex® honeycomb materials, Int. J. Adv. Manuf Technol, 115 (2021) 2853–2872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Xia, R. Y. Ge and J. P. Wang, Differential quadrature method for steady-state harmonic vibration of variable cross-section Euler-Bernoulli beams, Journal of Anhui Engineering University, 36(4) (2021) 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. G. Pan, S. C. Wu and W. Zhang, Free vibration analysis of Timoshenko cantilever beam with variable cross-section, Civil Architecture and Environmental Engineering, 31(3) (2009) 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Y. Tang and G. Prince, Natural frequency of transverse vibration of cantilever rayleigh beam, Journal of Jishou University, 38(2) (2017) 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Y. Cui, Research on linear and nonlinear static and dynamic numerical analysis methods for honeycomb sandwich shells, Doctoral Thesis, Tsinghua University, China (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. R. Tang, J. Zhu and J. X. Yu, Simulation and analysis of bending characteristics of curved honeycomb panels, Modern Defense Technology, 44(5) (2016) 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. W. Song, C. H. Yang, X. F. Shi and P. Xi, Parametric finite element modeling method for hexagonal honeycomb sandwich panels, Journal of Computer Aided Design and Graphics, 27(1) (2015) 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orthogonal Experimental Design Methodology, Orthogonal Experimental Design Method, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, China (1979).

  24. D. Jiangsu, X. B. Ziran and B. Kexue, Side structure optimization of multi-purpose passenger vehicle based on side collision, Journal of Jiangsu University-Natural Science Edition, 41(1) (2020) 15–45.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. F. Gu, Orthogonal experimental design of wind turbine tower structure based on finite element analysis, Wind Energy, 29 (7) 78–83.

  26. H. Q. Wan and Y. X. Wang, An investigation on the new-type high-damping damper for warp knitting machine, Knitting Industries (2) (2005) 3–4.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 12172210.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingpeng Han.

Additional information

Hao Huang received his bachelor’s degree in engineering from Shanghai Electric Power University in Shanghai, China, in 2022. He is currently pursuing his master’s degree at the Shanghai School of Energy and Mechanical Engineering. He is dedicated to the research of wind tunnel tail strut vibration reduction.

Qingpeng Han received the Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, in 2007. He is currently an Associate Professor with the College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai, China. His current research interests include the design and development of digital acquisition instruments and nonlinear analysis of vibration signals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, H., Han, Q., Wu, B. et al. Design and vibration reduction performance of honeycomb sandwich support rod for wind tunnel. J Mech Sci Technol 38, 527–539 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0103-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0103-3

Keywords

Navigation