Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of geometric parameters of a staggered labyrinth seal on leakage flow

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Staggered labyrinth seals are used in gas turbines for cooling turbine blades. In this study, numerical analyses were performed to evaluate the discharge coefficients about the shape variables of staggered labyrinth seals. Four shape variables were considered: cavity width (CW), staggered height (GH), staggered width (GW), and staggered position (GP). Changes in the discharge coefficient with the shape variables were analyzed. Strategies were investigated to decrease the discharge coefficient of a staggered labyrinth seal. The discharge coefficient of the optimized staggered labyrinth seal was 37 % smaller than that of a straight labyrinth seal. We hypothesized that the size of the vena contracta and acceleration in the axial direction were related to the discharge coefficient. However, an association between only the GW was not observed. The wall shear stress was sensitive only to the GH and independent of the other shape parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A c :

Cross-sectional area of labyrinth seal [m2]

AVN :

Normalized axial velocity \({\rm{AVN}} = {{{\rm{local}}\,{\rm{axial}}\,{\rm{velocity}}} \over {{\rm{average}}\,{\rm{axial}}\,{\rm{velocity}}}}\)

C d :

Discharge coefficient

C n :

Normalized clearance \({{\rm{C}}_{\rm{n}}} = {\xi \over {{\rm{clearance}}}}\)

C p :

Specific heat

CW :

Normalized cavity width CW = CW/C

GH :

Normalized staggered height GH = GH/C

GW :

Normalized staggered width GW = GW/C

GP :

Normalized staggered position GP = GP/(CW+0.5W)

k :

Turbulence kinetic energy [m2/s2]

:

Mass flow rate [kg/s]

P :

Pressure [Pa]

R :

Specific gas constant

T :

Temperature [K]

u :

Flow velocity [m/s]

u’:

RMS of the turbulent velocity fluctuations [m/s]

ρ :

Density [kg/m3]

γ :

Isentropic coefficient

ξ :

Coordinate from tooth tip

Id :

Ideal

In :

Inlet

Out :

Outlet

⋆:

Normalized

References

  1. H. L. Stocker, Determining and improving labyrinth seal performance in current and advanced high performance gas turbines, AGARD Conference Proceedings (237) (1978) 13.1–13.22.

  2. B. K. Sultanian, Gas Turbines Internal Flow Systems Modeling, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK (2018) 356.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. R. E. Chupp, R. C. Hendricks, S. B. Lattime and B. M. Steinetz, Sealing in turbomachinery, J. Propul. Power, 22 (2006) 313–349, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.17778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Iwatsubo, K. Fukumoto and H. Mochida, An Experimental Study of Dynamic Characteristics of Labyrinth Seal, NASA. Lewis Research Center, Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery (1994).

  5. G. Chochua et al., Computational modeling for honeycombstator gas annular seal, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 45 (2002) 1849–1863, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00280-0.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Zhao et al., Analysis of total leakage of finger seal with side leakage flow, Tribol. Int., 150 (2020) 106371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. L. Stocker, Advanced labyrinth seal design performance for high pressure ratio gas turbines, Proceedings of the ASME 1975 Winter Annual Meeting: GT Papers. ASME 1975 Winter Annual Meeting: GT Papers, Houston, Texas, USA (1975) https://doi.org/10.1115/75-WA/GT-22.

  8. B. Zhou, PowerGen gas turbine losses and condition monitoring: a loss data-based study, ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B, 2 (2016) 021007, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Iwasaki et al., Validation of CFD analysis method for seal dynamic coefficients with various labyrinth seal types, Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics, Oslo, Norway (2018), https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75251.

  10. E. Becker, Strömungsvorgänge in ringformigen spalten (Labyrinth-Dichtungen), Ver. Deut Ing., 51 (1907) 1133–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Gaurav, Labyrinth seal leakage analysis, M.Sc. Thesis, Texas A&M University, USA (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. M. Martin, Labyrinth packings, Engineering, 85 (1908) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Stodola, Steam and Gas Turbines, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (1927) 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Dollin and W. S. Brown, Flow of fluids through openings in series, Engineer, 164 (1937) 223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Hodkinson, Estimation of the leakage through a labyrinth gland, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 141 (1) (1939) 283–288, https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1939_141_037_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. U. Yucel, Leakage and swirl velocities in labyrinth seals, M.S. Thesis, Lehigh University, USA (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. S. Lee et al., Numerical analysis in the flow field of a labyrinth seal, Proc. 1990 Inf’l Compressor Engineering Conference, Purdue (1990) 835–844.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Wittig et al., Numerical predictions and measurements of discharge coefficients in labyrinth seals, Proceedings of the ASME 1987 International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibition. Volume 1: Turbomachinery, Anaheim, California, USA (1987) https://doi.org/10.1115/87-GT-188.

  19. S. Wittig et al., Heat transfer in stepped labyrinth seals, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 110 (1) (1988) 63–69, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3240088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. S. Kim and K. S. Cha, Comparative analysis of the influence of labyrinth seal configuration on leakage behavior, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 23 (8) (2009) 2830–2838, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0733-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. I. Baek and J. Ahn, Optimizing the geometric parameters of a straight-through labyrinth seal to minimize the leakage flow rate and the discharge coefficient, Energies, 14 (2021) 705, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Eser and Y. K. Jacob, Air flow in cavities of labyrinth seals, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 33 (1995) 2309–2326, https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(95)00072-6.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. A. D. Vakili et al., An experimental and numerical study of labyrinth seal flow, Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 3: Turbo Expo 2005, Parts A and B, Reno, Nevada, USA (2005) 1121–1128, https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2005-68224.

  24. M. Hur et al., Effect of clearance and cavity geometries on leakage performance of a stepped labyrinth seal, Processes, 8 (2020) 1496, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. H. Kim and J. Ahn, Large eddy simulation of leakage flow in a stepped labyrinth seal, Processes, 9 (2021) 2179, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Deng et al., Experimental investigation of geometry effect on discharge characteristic for stepped labyrinth seal, Proceedings of Montreal 2018 Global Power and Propulsion Forum, Montreal, Canada (2018).

  27. Y. H. Chun and J. Ahn, Optimizing the geometric parameters of a stepped labyrinth seal to minimize the discharge coefficient, Processes, 10 (2022) 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D. L. Rhode and R. I. Hibbs, Clearance effects on corresponding annular and labyrinth seal flow leakage characteristics, Journal of Tribology, 115 (4) (1993) 699–704, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2921696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. A. Demko et al., Effect of shaft rotation on the incompressible flow in a labyrinth seal, J. Propul. Power, 6 (1990) 171–176, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Hu et al., Dimensional analysis on resistance characteristics of labyrinth seals, J. Therm. Sci., 23 (2014) 516–522, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-014-0736-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. W. Tan et al., Investigation of staggered labyrinth tip shroud on flow mechanism of low-pressure turbine, Proceedings of Global Power and Propulsion Society, October 18–20 (2021).

  32. D. Joachimiak, Novel method of the seal aerodynamic design to reduce leakage by matching the seal geometry to flow conditions, Energies, 14 (2021) 7880, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Agency for Defense Development Grant funded by the Korean Government (UD220004JD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joon Ahn.

Additional information

Ye Hwan Chun received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from National Hanbat University in 2021. He is currently a Master’s student in Mechanical Engineering at Kookmin University. His research interests include optimal design of fluid machinery.

Joon Ahn is received his B.S. (1997), M.S. (1999), and Ph.D. (2003) from Seoul National University, Korea. He worked as a Senior Researcher at KIER (2006–2010) and is now a Professor at Kookmin University. His research interests include heat transfer and combustion problems in energy systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chun, Y.H., Ahn, J. Effects of geometric parameters of a staggered labyrinth seal on leakage flow. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 2959–2968 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0522-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0522-6

Keywords

Navigation