Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability assessment method based on the meta-action unit for complex mechanical system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a functionality unit named as meta-action unit (MAU) is proposed to correlate the system function with the part actions and assess reliability of mechanical system. Firstly, the function of system is decomposed into multiple MAUs by function-movement-action (FMA). Then, the lifetime of MAU is fitted by Weibull distribution, and its parameters are estimated by support vector regression (SVR). In addition, taking the distributions of MAU as marginal distributions, the lifetime distribution of mechanical system is constructed by copula function to assess system reliability, and its parameters are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Further, the reliability assessment accuracy based on MAU is compared with that from traditional method based on mechanical part failure modes. Finally, the reliability assessment of the indexing turntable (IT) is performed as an example to illustrate the feasibility and reasonability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FMA :

Function-movement-action

IT :

Indexing turntable

LSE :

Least square estimation

MA :

Meat action

MAC :

Meat action chain

MAU :

Meat action unit

MLE :

Maximum likelihood estimator

RMSE :

Root mean squared error

SER :

System empirical reliability

SVR :

Supporting vector regression

WPP :

Weibull probability paper

References

  1. J. F. Lawless, Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken (2011).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. X. Jia, Reliability analysis for q-Weibull distribution with multiply type-I censored data, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 37(6) (2021) 2790–2817.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. E. A. Ahmad and M. G. M. Ghazal, Exponentiated additive Weibull distribution, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 193 (2020) 106663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. T. Tien and R. Bris, An additive Chen-Weibull distribution and its applications in reliability modeling, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 37(1) (2021) 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Huo, S. K. Khosa, Z. Ahmad, Z. Almaspoor, M. Ilyas and M. Aamir, A new lifetime exponential-x family of distributions with applications to reliability data, Math. Probl. Eng., 2020 (2020) 1316345.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Alkaff, M. N. Qomarudin and Y. Bilfaqih, Network reliability analysis: matrix-exponential approach, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 204 (2020) 107192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Wen, Z. Wang, H. Fu, Q. Wu and C. Liu, BLUEs and reliability analysis for general censored data subject to inverse gaussian distribution, IEEE T. Reliab., 68(4) (2019) 1257–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. K. Shakhatreh, A. J. Lemonte and G. Moreno Arenas, The log-normal modified Weibull distribution and its reliability implications, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 188 (2019) 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Mathew and K. R. Deepa, Stress-strength reliability: a quantile approach, Statistics, 56(1) (2022) 206–221.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Farukkececi, Mechanical failure modes, Mechatronic Components, Elsevier Inc. (2019) 15–27.

  11. L. Wang, K. Wu, Y. M. Tripathi and C. Lodhi, Reliability analysis of multicomponent stress-strength reliability from a bathtub-shaped distribution, J. Appl. Stat., 49(1) (2022) 122–142.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Xu, D. Yu, Q. Hu and M. Xie, A reliability assessment approach for systems with heterogeneous component information, Qual. Eng., 30(4) (2018) 676–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Alkaff, Discrete time dynamic reliability modeling for systems with multistate components, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 209 (2021) 107462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. K. Son, Reliability prediction of engineering systems with competing failure modes due to component degradation, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25(7) (2011) 1717–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Park, N. H. Kim and R. T. Haftka, The effect of ignoring dependence between failure modes on evaluating system reliability, Struct. Multidiscip. O., 52(2) (2015) 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Bian, G. Wang and P. Liu, Reliability analysis for multi-component systems with interdependent competing failure processes, Appl. Math. Model., 94 (2021) 446–459.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Gu, C. Fan, L. Liang and J. Zhang, Reliability calculation method based on the copula function for mechanical systems with dependent failure, Ann. Oper. Res., 311 (2019) 99–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Jia, L. Wang and C. Wei, Reliability research of dependent failure systems using copula, Communications in Statistics — Simulation and Computation, 43(8) (2014) 1838–1851.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Xu, J. W. Herrmann and E. L. Droguett, Modeling dependent series systems with q-Weibull distribution and Clayton copula, Appl. Math. Model., 94 (2021) 117–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Sun, L. Luo and Q. Zhang, Reliability analysis of stochastic structure with multi-failure modes based on mixed copula, Eng. Fail. Anal., 105 (2019) 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Li, G. Zhang, M. Li, J. Lou and H. Zhao, Assembly reliability modeling technology based on meta-action, Procedia CIRP, 27 (2015) 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Li, Y. Ran and F. Wan, Condition-based maintenance strategy optimization of meta-action unit considering imperfect preventive maintenance based on wiener process, Flex. Serv. Manuf. J., 34 (2022) 204–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Li, C. Wu, X. Zhang, Y. Ran and G. Zhang, Early failure mechanism research of electromechanical product based on meta-action, Eng. Fail. Anal., 122(16) (2021) 105217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Li, G. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Zhang and Y. Ran, Research on reliability allocation technology for NC machine tool meta-action, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 35(6) (2019) 2016–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Yu, G. Zhang, Y. Ran, M. Li, D. Jiang and Y. Chen, A reliability allocation method for mechanical product based on meta-action, IEEE T. Reliab., 69(1) (2020) 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Yan, Z. Genbao and Z. Lian, Quality characteristic association analysis of computer numerical control machine tool based on meta-action assembly unit, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8(1) (2016) 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. X. Zhang, G. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Ran, H. Wang and X. Gong, A novel fault diagnosis approach of a mechanical system based on meta-action unit, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(2) (2019) 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. W. R. Blischke and D. N. P. Murthy, Reliability: Modeling, Prediction, and Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2000).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Yu, G. Zhang and Y. Ran, A more reasonable definition of failure mode for mechanical systems using meta-action, IEEE Access, 7 (2019) 4898–4904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Ran, W. Zhang and G. Zhang, Reliability and modal analysis of key meta-action unit for CNC machine tool, IEEE Access, 7 (2019) 23640–23655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Y. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Ran, G. Zhang and Y. Wang, Research on meta-action decomposition and meta-action unit modeling technology for electromechanical product, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 36(1) (2020) 268–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Ling, H. Huang and Q. Miao, Parameter estimation for Weibull distribution using support vector regression, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences/Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (2008) 445–449.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51835001, 52275473. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution and support of Ning Jiang Machine Tool Co., Ltd. (Sichuan, China), who provides the failure data of the mechanical product.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Ran.

Additional information

Xiao Zhu received the M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, in 2019. His research interests include mechatronic product reliability assessment and maintainability analysis.

Yan Ran received the M.S. and Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, in 2012 and 2016, respectively. She is currently an Associate Professor at Chongqing University, a fixed researcher at the State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, a member of the Chongqing Science and Technology Association and a member of the National Association of Basic Research on Interchangeability and Measurement Technology. Her research interests include mechatronic product reliability technology and modern quality engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Ran, Y. & Li, X. Reliability assessment method based on the meta-action unit for complex mechanical system. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 1233–1242 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0210-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0210-6

Keywords

Navigation