Abstract
This paper reports our study comparing the tensile stress-strain data taken on a fused filament fabricated Nylon 12 material additively manufactured in two distinct directions (i.e., horizontal and vertical), using typical dog-bone shaped specimens of two different cross-section shapes; rectangular and circular. Our objectives in carrying out this investigation were to evaluate the effects of specimen geometry on the elasticity and strength characteristics of the involved PA12 material. One-way ANOVA analysis, Tukey’s HSD, and Games-Howell tests were considered to compare the mean values of two cross-section shapes’ groups (i.e., rectangular vs. circular). The results of ultimate tensile strength obtained for horizontally printed specimens and the elongation at break deTermined for vertically oriented samples show notable differences at a significance p-level of 0.05.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AM :
-
Additive manufacturing
- FFF :
-
Fused filament fabrication
- PA12 :
-
Polyamide 12 (Nylon 12)
- MOE :
-
Modulus of elasticity
- UTS :
-
Ultimate tensile strength
- EaB :
-
Elongation at break
References
X. Gao, D. Zhang, X. Wen, S. Qi, Y. Su and X. Dong, Fused deposition modeling with polyamide 1012, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 25 (7) (2019) 1145–1154.
H. Li, S. Zhang, Z. Yi, J. Li, A. Sun, J. Guo and G. Xu, Bonding quality and fracture analysis of polyamide 12 parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23 (6) (2017) 973–982.
I. Ferreira, C. Melo, R. Neto, M. Machado, J. L. Alves and S. Mould, Study of the annealing influence on the mechanical performance of PA12 and PA12 fibre reinforced FFF printed specimens, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 26 (10) (2020) 1761–1770.
M. Kam, A. İpekçi and Ö. Sengül, Investigation of the effect of FDM process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed PA12 samples using Taguchi method, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. (2021).
F. Knoop and V. Schoeppner, Mechanical and thermal properties of FDM parts manufactured with polyamide 12, 2015 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, USA (2015).
A. García-Domínguez, J. Claver, A. M. Camacho and M. A. Sebastián, Considerations on the applicability of test methods for mechanical characterization of materials manufactured by FDM, Materials, 13 (1) (2020) 28.
D. Popescu, A. Zapciu, C. Amza, F. Baciu and R. Marinescu, FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review, Polymer Testing, 69 (2018) 157–166.
L. Bergonzi, M. Vettori, A. Pirondi, F. Moroni and F. Musiari, Numerical and experimental validation of a non-standard specimen for uniaxial tensile test, Procedia Structural Integrity, 12 (2018) 392–403.
ASTM D638-14:2014, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2014).
ISO 527-2:2012, Plastics-DeTermination of Tensile Properties-Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (2012).
C. Vălean, L. Marşavina, M. Mărghitaş, E. Linul, J. Razavi and F. Berto, Effect of manufacturing parameters on tensile properties of FDM printed specimens, Procedia Structural Integrity, 26 (2020) 313–320.
N. Naveed, Investigate the effects of process parameters on material properties and microstructural changes of 3D-printed specimens using fused deposition modeling (FDM), Materials Technology, 36 (5) (2021) 317–330.
T. N. A. T. Rahim, A. M. Abdullah, H. M. Akil and D. Mohamad, Comparison of mechanical properties for polyamide 12 composite-based biomaterials fabricated by fused filament fabrication and injection molding, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1791 (1) (2016) 020007.
Z. Shen, H. Hua, S. Yang and Y. Zhang, Effect of fabrication parameters and material features on tensile strength of fdm built parts, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 423 (1) (2018) 012050.
S. A. Fiberlab, Technical Data Sheet Nylon PA12, https://c-3d.niceshops.com/upload/file/FIBERLOGY_NYLON_PA12_TDS.pdf, Last updated December 1 (2021).
O. S. Es-Said, J. Foyos, R. Noorani, M. Mendelson, R. Marloth and B. A. Pregger, Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 15 (1) (2000) 107–122.
S. Mahmood, A. J. Qureshi, K. L. Goh and D. Talamona, Tensile strength of partially filled FFF printed parts: experimental results, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23 (3) (2017) 524–533.
B. G. Çakan, Effects of raster angle on tensile and surface roughness properties of various FDM filaments, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 35 (8) (2021) 3347–3353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Marius Nicolae Baba graduated Faculty of Wood Engineering and received his Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. in 2010 from Transilvania University of Braşov in the field of strength of materials and theory of elasticity. In parallel to his university position, between 2013 and 2017, he worked as a senior structural engineer in aerospace engineering for Consaro Engineering S.R.L. His research interests focus on structural mechanics of CFRP laminate composites and AM materials, fatigue and fracture mechanics, and finite element analysis.
Călin Itu graduated Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and received his Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. in 2014 from Transilvania University of Braşov. His research field is concerned with strength of materials, multi-body dynamics, mechanical vibrations, and the finite element method. In parallel to his university post, between 2006 and 2019, he worked as a senior stress engineer in the field of automotive engineering and heavy machinery for Cambric Consulting S.R.L., Tata Technologies S.R.L, and Schaffler Romania S.R.L.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baba, M.N., Itu, C. The influence of dog-bone shaped specimen geometry on tensile test results of fused filament fabricated Nylon 12. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 1077–1082 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-2102-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-2102-6