Skip to main content
Log in

Thermo-hydraulic characteristics of heat exchangers having the smooth or the herringbone wave fins on 12.7 mm tubes under dehumidifying condition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study extends the investigations of Kim [11] to a wet condition, who tested heat exchangers having fins of the smooth wave or herringbone wave geometry on 12.7 mm tubes under dry condition. Results showed that the j and f factors were independent of the fin pitch. Furthermore, the smooth wave fin geometry yielded 22 % to 28 % higher j factors, and 24 % to 28 % higher f factors compared with the herringbone wave geometry. The ratios of the j/f1/3 between the smooth wave and the herringbone wave configuration were 1.07, 1.14 and 1.19 for 1 row, 2 row and 4 row, respectively. These ratios were approximately the same as those obtained under dry condition [11]. Both for the smooth and the herringbone wave fin samples, the wet surface yielded higher j and f factors than the dry surface. For example, at a fin pitch of 3.0 mm of the smooth wave fin geometry, the j factors under wet condition were 2 % to 40 % higher than those under dry condition. Similarly, the f factors under wet condition were 56 % to 64 % higher than those under dry condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Heat transfer area, m2

b r12 :

Slope of the air saturation curve between the inlet and exit air temperature, J/kgK

b p :

Slope of the air saturation curve between the outside and inside tube wall temperature, J/kgK

b r :

Slope of the air saturation curve between the mean tube and water temperature, J/kgK

b wm :

Slope of the air saturation curve at the mean water film temperature of the airside surface, J/kgK

C p :

Specific heat, J/kgK

C r :

Heat capacity ratio (dimensionless)

D o :

Tube outer diameter, m

f :

Airside friction factor (dimensionless)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient, W/m2K

i :

Enthalpy, J/kg

j :

Colburn j factor (dimensionless)

k :

Thermal conductivity W/mK

K c :

Contraction coefficient (dimensionless)

K e :

Expansion coefficient (dimensionless)

m :

Mass flow rate, kg/s

N :

Number of tube row (dimensionless)

NTU :

Number of transfer units (dimensionless)

P d :

Waffle depth, m

Pi :

Longitudinal tube pitch, m

P t :

Transverse tube pitch, m

Pr:

Prandtl number (dimensionless)

Q :

Heat transfer rate, W

Re Do :

Tube-side Reynolds number based on Do (dimensionless)

t :

Tube wall thickness, film thickness, m

U :

Overall heat transfer coefficient, W/m2·K

V :

Velocity in the tube, m/s

V max :

Velocity based on the minimum flow area of the frontal surface, m/s

X f :

Half the waffle spacing, m

ε :

Thermal effectiveness (dimensionless)

ΔP :

Pressure loss, Pa

η o :

Surface efficiency (dimensionless)

ρ:

Density, kg/m3

V :

Kinematic viscosity, m2/s

σ :

Contraction ratio of the cross-sectional area (dimensionless)

a :

Air

c :

Heat exchanger core

i :

Tube-side

in :

Inlet

m :

Mean

max :

Maximum

min :

Minimum

o :

Outside

out :

Outlet

p :

Tube

r :

Water

w :

Water, wet surface

References

  1. D. R. Mirth and S. Ramadhyani, Prediction of cooling coil performance under condensing conditions, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 14 (1993) 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y.-C. Liu, S. Wongwises, W.-J. Chang and C.-C. Wang, Airside performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers in dehumidifying conditions-data with larger diameter, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 53 (2010) 1603–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. F. Stoecker and J. W. Jones, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, McGraw-Hill Pub., New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.-C. Wang, Y.-J. Du and Y.-J. Chang, Airside performance of herringbone fin-and-tube heat exchangers in wet conditions, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 77 (1999) 1225–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C.-C. Wang, W.-H. Tao and Y.-J. Du, Effect of waffle eight on the airside performance of wavy fin-and-tube heat exchangers under dehumidifying conditions, Heat Transfer Eng., 21 (2000) 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Pirompugd, C.-C. Wang and S. Wongwises, A review on reduction method for heat and mass transfer characteristics of fin-and-tube heat exchangers under dehumidifying conditions, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 52(9–10) (2009) 2370–2378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C.-C. Wang and J.-S. Liaw, Airside performance of herringbone wavy fin-and-tube heat exchangers under dehumidifying condition-data with larger diameter tube, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 55 (2012) 3054–3060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Youn and N.-H. Kim, An experimental investigation on the airside performance of fin and tube heat exchangers having sinusoidal wave fins, Heat Mass Transfer, 43 (2007) 1249–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N.-H. Kim, Air-side performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having sine wave fins under wet condition, J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 29(9) (2015) 4061–4070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N.-H. Kim, Personal Communication with Samhwa Ace Co., Samhwa Ace Co., Seoul (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N.-H. Kim, Comparison of the heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having smooth or herringbone wave fins used for building air handling units, J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 35 (10) (2021) (to be published).

  12. ASHRAE Standard 41.1:1986, Standard Method for Temperature Measurement, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. ASHRAE Standard 41.2:1987, Standard Methods for Laboratory Air Flow Measurement, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. ASHRAE Standard 41.5:1975, Standard Measurement Guide: Engineering Analysis, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. ESDU 98005, Design and Performance Evaluation of Heat Exchangers: The Effectiveness and NTU Method. Part 3: Graphical and Analytical Data, Engineering Sciences Data Unit (ESDU), London (1998) 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Gnielinski, New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe flows, Int. Chem. Eng., 16 (1976) 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. E. Schmidt, Heat transfer calculations for extended surfaces, J. ASRE Refrig. Eng., 4 (1949) 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. M. Kays and A. L. London, Compact Heat Exchangers, 3rd Ed., Krieger Pub. (1984).

  19. K. Torikoshi, G. N. Xi, Y. Nakazawa and H. Asano, Flow and heat transfer performance of a plate fin and tube heat exchanger (first report: effect of fin pitch), Proceedings of the 10th Int. Heat Transfer Conf., 4 (1994) 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. L. Webb and N.-H. Kim, Principles of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 2nd Ed., Taylor and Francis Pub. (2005).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nae-Hyun Kim.

Additional information

Nae-Hyun Kim is a Professor in School of Mechanical System Engineering, University of Incheon. He received Ph.D. from Penn State University in 1989. His interest includes heat transfer enhancement, boiling and condensation in minichannels, flow distribution in flow heat exchangers, etc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, NH. Thermo-hydraulic characteristics of heat exchangers having the smooth or the herringbone wave fins on 12.7 mm tubes under dehumidifying condition. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 5225–5232 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1039-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1039-5

Keywords

Navigation