Skip to main content
Log in

Hydraulic components’ matching optimization design and entropy production analysis in a large vertical centrifugal pump

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The large vertical centrifugal pump is the core power equipment for long-distance water division and large-scale irrigation projects. The power of the matching motor can reach 40 MW. In view of reducing the operating energy consumption of this kind of pump, the efficiency under the design condition was taken as the optimization objective, and a matching optimization on hydraulic components was proposed in this research. The optimization process was divided into two stages. The first stage focused on improving the configuration of the vane diffuser. In the second stage, the Plackett-Burman test design was used to screen out the optimization design variables of the vane diffuser and the volute, the optimal Latin hypercube sampling method was adopted to generate 106 sample cases, and an automatic numerical simulation optimization platform was built. Then, different approximate models were employed to construct the relationship between the optimization design variables and the objective function, and their fitting accuracy and robustness were compared. Finally, the optimal design parameters were determined by particle swarm optimization, and entropy production theory was used to analyze the internal flow pattern of the model before and after optimization. Results showed that D3, b4, β3, and S8 have the greatest impact on the hydraulic efficiency of the pump. The multilayer backpropagation neural network has a higher fitting accuracy and better robustness compared with the other three approximate models. The efficiency of the optimized model under the design condition is increased by 4.22 %, reaching 90.82 %. Reducing the number of layers and vanes of the diffuser and improving the matching of hydraulic components can dramatically improve the hydraulic performance and hump characteristics of large vertical centrifugal pumps. Entropy production theory is a reliable approach to visualizing flow loss. The turbulent flow dissipation in the vane diffuser can be reduced the most after optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Sr :

Strouhal number

Eu :

Euler number

n s :

Specific speed

n :

Rotating speed, r/min

Q :

Flow rate, m3/h

H :

Pump head, m

C H :

Head coefficient

C Q :

Flow rate coefficient

D 2 :

Impeller outlet diameter

g :

Gravity factor, m/s2

b 2 :

Impeller outlet width, mm

η :

Hydraulic efficiency

Τ :

Impeller torque, N

ω :

Impeller rotation angular velocity

ρ :

Fluid density, kg/m3

P tout :

Total pressure at outlet of the pump, Pa

P tin :

Total pressure at inlet of the pump, Pa

h :

Energy head value, m

P out :

Total pressure at outlet of the components, Pa

P in :

Total pressure at inlet of the components, Pa

x :

Optimization design variables

F 1 :

Optimization objective function

S 8 :

Volute throat area, mm2

v 3 :

Average velocity of volute section, m/s

k 3 :

Speed factor

φ 0 :

The angle between the section and the 0 section, °

S φ :

The φ section area of the volute, mm2

R 2 :

Decisive factor

ε :

Turbulence dissipation rate

T :

Temperature

References

  1. D. Y. Li et al., Unsteady simulation and analysis for hump characteristics of a pump turbine model, Renewable Energy, 77 (2005) 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. X. Gao et al., Numerical and experimental study of unsteady flow in a large centrifugal pump with stay vanes, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 136(7) (2014) 071101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. C. Lu et al., Energy balance and local unsteady loss analysis of flows in a low specific speed model pump-turbine in the positive slope region on the pump performance curve, Energies, 12(22) (2019) 1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. J. Deng et al., An optimization method based on design of experiments and its application to centrifugal pumps, Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 26(6) (2008) 707–711.

    Google Scholar 

  5. X. C. Gan et al., Multi-component optimization of a vertical inline pump based on multi-objective pso and artificial neural network, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34(12) (2020) 4883–4896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Derakhshan et al., Numerical shape optimization of a centrifugal pump impeller using artificial bee colony algorithm, Computers and Fluids, 81 (2013) 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Wang et al., Geometrical optimization of pump-as-turbine (PAT) impellers for enhancing energy efficiency with 1-D theory, Energies, 13(16) (2020) 4120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Shi et al., Multi-disciplinary optimization design of axial-flow pump impellers based on the approximation model, Energies, 13(4) (2020) 779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Pei et al., Multiparameter optimization for the nonlinear performance improvement of centrifugal pumps using a multilayer neural network, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 33(6) (2019) 2681–2691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Kim and K. Y. Kim, Analysis and optimization of a vaned diffuser in a mixed flow pump to improve hydrodynamic performance, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 134(7) (2012) 071104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Pei et al., Multi-objective shape optimization on the inlet pipe of a vertical inline pump, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 141(6) (2019) 061108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. J. Wang et al., Optimization of the diffuser in a centrifugal pump by combining response surface method with multi-island genetic algorithm, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 231(2) (2017) 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. J. Wang, Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. W. Wang, SPSS Statistical Analysis and Comprehensive Application, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai, China (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Y. Lai, Isight Theory of Parametric Optimization, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, Beijing, China (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Han and J. R. Zhang, A survey of metamodel-ling techniques in engineering optimization, Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 38(6) (2012) 762–768 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Wang et al., Load-balanced and locality-aware scheduling for data-intensive workloads at extreme scales, Concurrency Computation Practice Experience, 28(1) (2016) 70–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. A. Bezerra et al., Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry, Talanta, 76(5) (2008) 965–977.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. P. C. Kleijnen, Kriging metamodeling in simulation: a review, European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3) (2009) 707–716.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. W. Heo et al., High-efficiency design optimization of a centrifugal pump, J. Mechan. Sci. Technol., 30 (2016) 3917–3927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. IV (1995) 1942–1948.

  22. Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart, A modified particle swarm optimizer, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (1998) 69–73.

  23. K. Bejan, Entropy Generation through Heat and Fluid Flow, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. D. Gu et al., Clocking effect of vaned diffuser on hydraulic performance of high-power pump by using the numerical flow loss visualization method, Energy, 170 (2019) 986–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Kock and H. Herwig, Entropy production calculation for turbulent shear flows and their implementation in CFD codes, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 26(4) (2005) 672–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51979125), Primary Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BE2019089), and Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. SJCX21_1682). The research was assisted by the Hang Zhou Jiang He Hydro-Electric Science and Technology Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desheng Zhang.

Additional information

Gang Yang is currently a Master candidate in National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University. His research interests include optimization design, computational flow dynamics, and hydraulic stability of large centrifugal pumps.

Xutao Zhao is currently a Ph.D. candidate in National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University. He received his M.A. degree from Lanzhou University of Technology in 2020. His research interests include the optimization design of centrifugal pumps and the internal flow investigation of axial waterjet pumps.

Desheng Zhang is currently a Professor in the National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University. He received his Ph.D. from Jiangsu University in 2010. His research interests include unsteady cavitating turbulent flows in hydrofoils and pumps and the theory and optimized design of fluid machinery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, G., Zhao, X., Zhang, D. et al. Hydraulic components’ matching optimization design and entropy production analysis in a large vertical centrifugal pump. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 5033–5048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1021-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1021-2

Keywords

Navigation