Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive study of relationships between surface morphology parameters and contact stress

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface roughness morphology seriously restricts workpiece interface contact performance, and therefore it is necessary to remove the fog of relationships between morphology parameters and contact stress (CS). To study the issue, use correlation analysis and BP network to set up correlation mapping model, thereafter introduce global sensitivity analysis Morris (qualitative) and Sobol (quantitative) to get “main influence parameters (MIP)”. Afterwards, construct a optimal nonlinear regression model between MIP and CS in line with complete polynomial and the idea of permutation and combination. Finally, analyze MIP influence path on CS from statistical path analysis. The paper main contributions are as follows: 1. From the perspective of theoretical analysis, a reasonable method to select parameters about CS performance characterization is proposed to avoid the empirical selection errors; 2. Correlation relationships bridge is built between MIP and CS, with quantitative influence way of parameters on contact stress studied and clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Hu et al., Nonlinear tribo-dynamic model and experimental verification of a spur gear drive under loss-of-lubrication condition, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 153 (2021) 107509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Zhang et al., Ratchetting-multiaxial fatigue damage analysis in gear rolling contact considering tooth surface roughness, Wear, 428 (2019) 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Xiong et al., Experimental study on surface morphology of ultra-precision turning, Manufacturing Technology and Machine Tool, 7 (2020) 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Liu et al., Effects of lubrication on gear performance: a review, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 145 (2020) 103701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Zhou et al., Influence of surface roughness on the friction property of textured surface, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(2) (2015) 758577100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Wang and Q. Liang, Influence of surface topography on friction and wear properties of cold die steel, Surface Technology, 48(10) (2019) 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Zhang, S. Li and Q. Zhang, Effect of surface micromorphology on the deformation and bonding quality of stainless steel/carbon steel during hot isostatic pressing, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55(10) (2019) 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. He et al., Three-dimensional surface roughness characterization and application, Optics and Precision Engineering, 26(8) (2018) 1994–2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Liu and L. Zhang, Selection and effect of parts surface roughness, Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2 (2004) 114–115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Li, X. Jiang and Z. Li, Summary of development of 3D surface function evaluation technology, Tool Engineering, 2 (2002) 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Wu, Research progress of rough surface contact, Advances in Mechanics, 1 (1991) 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. A. Greenwood, C. Putignano and M. Ciavarella, A Greenwood and Williamson theory for line contact, Wear, 270(3–4) (2011) 332–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. N. J. Persson, Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces: on the validity of the method of reduction of dimensionality, Tribology Letters, 58(1) (2015) 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Lai, C. Gao and J. Huang, Advances on sliding frictional contact models of rough surfaces, Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 9(2) (2011) 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Wei et al., Progress of study on contact models of rough surfaces, Lubrication Engineering, 34(7) (2009) 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Brandt and A. A. Lubrecht, Multilevel matrix multiplication and fast solution of integral equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 90(2) (1990) 348–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Wang et al., An efficient numerical method with a parallel computational strategy for solving arbitrarily shaped inclusions in elastoplastic contact problems, Journal of Tribology, 135(3) (2013) 031401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Wen et al., A new elliptical microcontact model considering elastoplastic deformation, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 232(11) (2018) 1352–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Wen et al., A reconstruction and contact analysis method of three-dimensional rough surface based on ellipsoidal asperity, Journal of Tribology, 142(4) (2020) 041502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Draganovská et al., The study of parameters of surface roughness by the correlation analysis, Materials Science Forum, 818 (2015) 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Q. Qi et al., A correlational study of areal surface texture parameters on some typical machined surfaces, Procedia CIRP, 27 (2015) 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. P. Dong and K. J. Stout, An integrated approach to the characterization of surface wear. I: qualitative characterization, Wear, 81 (1995) 700–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Á. Czifra and S. Horváth, Complex microtopography analysis in sliding friction of steel-ferodo material pair, Meccanica, 46(3) (2011) 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Bulaha, Analysis of service properties of cylindrically ground surfaces, using Standard ISO 25178–2:2012. surface texture parameters, Proc. of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Rezekne, Latvia (2015) 16–21.

  25. ISO Standard 25178-2:2012, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-Surface Texture: Area, Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Vincent and P. Soille, Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6 (1991) 583–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Augasta and T. Kathirvalavakumar, Pruning algorithms of neural networks-a comparative study, Open Computer Science, 3(3) (2013) 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Zhang and D. Wang, An improved BP neural network based on CPA, Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 38(3) (2016) 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. D. Morris, Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments, Technometrics, 33(2) (1991) 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni and A. Saltelli, An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models, Environmental Modelling and Software, 22(10) (2007) 1509–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. I. M. Sobol, On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models, Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2(1) (1990) 112–118.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Chen et al., A computational inverse technique to determine the dynamic constitutive model parameters of concrete, Computers, Materials, and Continua, 25(2) (2011) 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Kai et al., Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nonlinear dynamics by the complete discrimination system for polynomial method, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 141 (2020) 110314.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. C. Lleras, Path analysis, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 3(1) (2015) 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  35. X. Song et al., Sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters using a statistical theory approach, Advances in Water Science, 23(5) (2012) 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. N. Spiess and N. Neumeyer, An evaluation of R2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: a Monte Carlo approach, BMC Pharmacology, 10(1) (2010) 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. L. Sapra, Using R2 with caution, Current Medicine Research and Practice, 4(3) (2014) 130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFB2004700) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through Grants No. 51705142.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Duo Yang, Jinyuan Tang & Yuqin Wen

  2. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Precision Machining of Difficult-to-Cut Material, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China

    Wei Zhou

Authors
  1. Duo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinyuan Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuqin Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyuan Tang.

Additional information

Jinyuan Tang received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Central South University, Changsha, China. He joined the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing at Central South University since 1982. His research areas cover intelligent manufacturing of high performance devices, and research on design theory of high performance power transmission device.

Yang Duo graduated from Wuhan University of Technology with a bachelor’s degree in 2018. Now he is a Ph.D. Student in the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing at Central South University, Changsha, China. He is mainly engaged in the relationship between surface morphology and contact properties and his research also coveres tribology, wear.

Wei Zhou received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Central South University, China, in 2011 and 2016, respectively. He joined the Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Precision Machining of Difficult-to-Cut Material at Hunan University of Science and Technology since 2016. His research areas cover tribology and structural fatigue and fracture.

Yuqin Wen received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Central South University, Changsha, China, in 2015. Then, he was a Ph.D. student in the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing at the same university. His research areas cover tribology and structural fatigue and fracture.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, D., Tang, J., Zhou, W. et al. Comprehensive study of relationships between surface morphology parameters and contact stress. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 4975–4985 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1016-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1016-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation