Skip to main content
Log in

A novel tool to optimize the performance of SCARA robots used in pick and place operations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

SCARA robots have been manufactured in different sizes and link ratios to satisfy a range of applications such as pick-and-place operations. Studies about kinematic design have reported several approaches to quantify the performance of these robots. However, some of these are configuration-dependant, and some others are dedicated to solving specific applications. The novel tool reported here provides an image of the workspace in which the manipulator generates quasi-optimal trajectories for a given ratio of the link lengths. This single value is named optimal kinematic performance index. It provides the best link lengths ratio and a map of pick-and-place points that would perform the task with a minimum angular displacement of the links. Examples related to the optimization of the trajectory, design of the link lengths or to the selection of a commercial model, are presented. A survey of commercial SCARA robots is conducted to classify them according to their OKPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Makino, Development of the SCARA, Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 26(1) (2014) 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Isaksson, L. Nyhof and S. Nahavandi, On the feasibility of utilizing gearing to extend the rotational workspace of a class of parallel robots, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 35 (2015) 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Gosselin et al., Workspace and sensitivity analysis of a novel nonredundant parallel SCARA robot featuring infinite tool rotation, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 1(2) (2016) 77–783.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Brooks, Planning collision-free motions for pick-and-place operations, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2(4) (1983) 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Lozano-Pérez, Automatic planning of manipulator transfer movements, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 10 (1987) 681–698.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Angeles, A. Alivizatos and P. Zsombor-Murray, The synthesis of smooth trajectories for pick-and-place operations, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1) (1988) 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Huang et al., Time minimum trajectory planning of a 2-DOF translational parallel robot for pick-and-place operations, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 56(1) (2007) 365–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Pellicciari et al., A method for reducing the energy consumption of pick-and-place industrial robots, Mechatronics, 23 (2013) 776–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Gosselin and J. Angeles, A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators, Journal of Mechanical Design, 113(3) (1991) 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Zhang, Z. Yao and Z. Du, Global performance index system for kinematic optimization of robotic mechanism, Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(3) (2014) 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Huang et al., Optimal design of a 2-DOF pick-and-place parallel robot using dynamic performance indices and angular constraints, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 70 (2013) 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kucuk and Z. Bingul, Comparative study of performance indices for fundamental robot manipulators, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54(7) (2006) 567–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. V. S. Subhashini, N. V. S. Raju and G. Venkata-Rao, Parametric optimization of link lengths of a SCARA robot for deburring of circular paths, CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future, Springer (2016) 127–135.

  14. S. Patel and T. Sobh, Manipulator performance measures-a comprehensive literature survey, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, 77 (2015) 547–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. González-Palacios, Advanced engineering platform for industrial development, The Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 10(3) (2012) 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Angeles, Fundamental of Robotic Mechanical Systems. Theory, Methods, and Algorithms, Fourth Ed., Springer (2014).

  17. S. M. LaValle, Planning Algorithms, First Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. M. A. González-Palacios, C. A. Bernal-Martínez and L. A. Aguilera-Cortés, OptimPlot3D: a novel and interactive software package for analysis of three dimensional surfaces, CERMA Proceedings of the 2009 Electronics, Robotics and automotive Mechanics Conference, Cuernavaca, México, 1 (2009) 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Castelli, E. Ottaviano and M. Ceccarelli, A fairly general algorithm to evaluate workspace characteristics of serial and parallel manipulators, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 36(1) (2008) 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Ceccarelli, G. Carbone and E. Ottaviano, Multi criteria optimum design of manipulators, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences (2005) 9–18.

  21. S. Rao Singiresu, Engineering Optimization, Fourth Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Council of Science and Technology, CONACYT), of Mexico, through SNI (National Network of Researchers) fellowships and scholarships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario A. Garcia-Murillo.

Additional information

Max Antonio González-Palacios received Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering in 1986 from Universidad Ibero-americana-León, Master’s degree in Engineering from Universidad de Guanajuato, and a Ph.D. in 1991 from McGill University, Montreal, where he completed a postdoctorate in 1993. He was a Full Professor of the Engineering Division Campus Irapuato-Salamanca of Universidad de Guanajuato, 2006–2018. In industry, from 1997 to 2000, he directed the R&D Department of Placage Unique, Inc., Quebec. Since 2000, he is the Director of Integration of Industrial Process (IPI), where he has developed several applied research projects and since 2005, he leads the development of the ADEFID platform.

Mario A. García-Murillo received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Universidad Autónoma Chapingo in 2008. In 2010, he obtained his M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya in Mexico. He earned his Ph.D. from IPN CICATA Querétaro in 2015. Dr. García-Murillo is currently a Full-time Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the Universidad de Guanajuato and a member of the SNI of México. His current research interests include kinematics and dynamics of manipulators.

Mariana González Dávila received her Bachelor’s degree in Mechatronics Engineering in 2014 from Universidad Iberoamericana-León, Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Universidad de Guanajuato in 2019. She is currently working on the development of ADEFID’s platform.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Palacios, M.A., Garcia-Murillo, M.A. & González-Dávila, M. A novel tool to optimize the performance of SCARA robots used in pick and place operations. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 4715–4726 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0937-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0937-x

Keywords

Navigation