Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective intelligent cooperative design for interference fit of the conical sleeve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the multi-objective intelligent cooperative optimization for interference fit of conical sleeve. The influence of various factors on contact pressure of conical sleeve was quantitatively analyzed, and the relationship among multi-objectives and multivariables was comprehensively built. Take the cone sleeve of oil film bearing as the research object, the key factors of the cone sleeve were determined with a combination of actual situations, and its sample data was obtained by central composite test design. Considering the multi-objective involving yield strength, torque and mass, the approximate model of the response surface based on the kriging algorithm was given. Then, a multi-objective intelligent cooperative design method for interference fit of the cone sleeve was established by solving the NSGA-II algorithm. Example analysis has shown that such a method makes up for the deficiency of theoretical design to ignore the stress concentration problem, and its accuracy is 32 times that of the BP neural network algorithm. Finally, the experiments verified the correctness of this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

δ :

Interference

S :

Assembly stroke

β :

Cone angle

L :

Contact length

D :

Outer diameter

d m :

Average combined diameter

δ min :

Minimum interference

δ max :

Maximum interference

F :

Axial force

T :

Torque

K :

Safety factor

μ :

Friction factor

p min :

Minimum contact pressure

σ ss :

Yield strength of the roller

σ sc :

Yield strength of the cone sleeve

v :

Poisson’s ratio

E :

Elastic modulus

p max :

Maximum contact pressure

E max :

Maximum equivalent stress

p smin :

Designed minimum contact pressure

m :

Mass of the cone sleeve

References

  1. D. T. Qin and L. Y. Xie, Modern Mechanical Design Manual, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, China (2011) 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Teng et al., Mechanical properties and design method of cylindrical interference fit, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 13 (2012) 160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Zhang, B. Mcclain and X. D. Fang, Design of interference fits via finite element method, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 42(9) (2000) 1835–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Croccolo, M. D. Agostinis and N. Vincenzi, Design and optimization of shaft-hub hybrid joints for lightweight structures: analytical definition of normalizing parameters, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 56(1) (2012) 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Strozzi et al., Normalization of the stress concentrations at the rounded edges of an interference fit between a solid shaft subjected to bending and a hub, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 44(4) (2016) 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. M. Wang et al., Modeling and finite element analysis of load-carrying performance of a wind turbine considering the influence of assembly factors, Appl. Sci., 7(3) (2017) 298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Wang et al., Reliability-based robust design of wind turbine’s shrink disk, Proc. IMechE Part C: J. of Mechanical Engineering Science, 232 (2018) 2685–2696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. X. Yang et al., Key parameters of fretting damage under shrink fit, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46(16) (2010) 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Sniezek, J. Zimmerman and A. Zimmerman, The carrying capacity of conical interference-fit joints with laser reinforcement zones, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210(6–7) (2010) 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Qiu and M. Zhou, Analytical solution for interference fit for multi-layer thick-walled cylinders and the application in crankshaft bearing design, Appl. Sci., 6(6) (2016) 167.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Bozkaya and S. Müftü, Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants, Journal of Biomechanics, 36(11) (2003) 1649–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. I. S. Barmanov and M. N. Ortikov, Ball bearing dynamics at the interference fit on balls, Procedia Engineering, 176 (2017) 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Y. Zhang and S. Z. Wang, Analysis of contact stress and dynamic performance of conical interference fit based on FEA model, Journal of Donghua University, 40(1) (2014) 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Wang et al., Viscosity monitoring and control on oil-film bearing lubrication with ferrofluids, Tribology International, 75 (2014) 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Xia et al., Interface bonding properties of multi-layered metal composites using material composition method, Tribology International, 131 (2019) 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Chen and G. Wu, Kriging-assisted design optimization of the impeller geometry for an automotive torque converter, Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57 (2018) 2503–2514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Gao et al., Multi-objective optimization of weld geometry in hybrid fiber laser-arc butt welding using kriging model and NSGA-II, Appl. Phys. A, 122 (2016) 610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Ning et al., Multiobjective intelligent cooperative design for the multilayer interference fit, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019 (2019) 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. H. Kang and H. W. Lee, Study on the design parameters of a low speed coupling of a wind turbine, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18(5) (2017) 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. U. A. Campos and D. E. Hall, Simplified Lamé’s Eqs. to determine contact pressure and hoop stress in thin-walled press-fits, Thin-Walled Structures, 138 (2019) 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. X. Q. Zhao and P. Shang, Exact solution of stresses of tapered interference fit, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 556–562 (2014) 4284–4287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. G. Wang and S. Shan, Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(4) (2007) 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Kleijnen, Kriging meta-modeling in simulation: a review, European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3) (2009) 707–716.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Lee et al., Optimization of pre-swirl nozzle shape and radial location to increase discharge coefficient and temperature drop, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 33(10) (2019) 4855–4866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Chen et al., Multi-objective optimization of the vehicle ride comfort based on kriging approximate model and NSGA-II, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29(3) (2015) 1007–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Deb et al., A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2) (2002) 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. M. N. Ghoreishi, M. Fakoor and M. Aminjafari, An automatic multi-objective optimization tool for the optimum design of a cracked pressure vessel with composite coating, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 33(10) (2019) 4867–4875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. X. Xu et al., The structure optimization of tracked ambulance nonlinear vibration reduction system, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31(2) (2017) 523–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. D. Youn and K. K. Choi, A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization, Computers & Structures, 82(2–3) (2004) 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Jie et al., An efficient multi-objective PSO algorithm assisted by kriging metamodel for expensive black-box problems, J. Glob. Optim., 67 (2017) 399–423.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Xiao et al., A generalised collaborative optimisation method and its combination with kriging metamodels for engineering design, Journal of Engineering Design, 23 (2012) 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Croccolo, M. D. Agostinis and P. Mauri, Influence of the assembly process on the shear strength of shaft-hub hybrid joints, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 44(26) (2013) 174–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Z. Xiao et al., Studying the fatigue life of a non-pneumatic wheel by using finite-life design for life prediction, Strojniskivestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 64(1) (2018) 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875382, No. 52035006), and Research Project Supported by Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (No. 2020-125).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianmei Wang.

Additional information

Jianmei Wang is a Professor in the Engineering Research Center Heavy Machinery Ministry of Education at Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China. In 2009, she received her Ph.D. in Mechanical and Electronic Engineering from Taiyuan University of Technology. Her research interests include tribology, advanced manufacturing technology and structural optimum design of heavy machinery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, K., Wang, J., Li, P. et al. Multi-objective intelligent cooperative design for interference fit of the conical sleeve. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 3569–3578 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0728-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0728-4

Keywords

Navigation