Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of drag reduction performance of half NACA 0009 and 0012 airfoils placed over a trailer on the flow around truck-trailer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The drag reduction performance of a half airfoil attached to a trailer and the roof fairing at different positions was experimentally investigated in a wind tunnel. Half airfoils have NACA 0009 and NACA 0012 cross-section and the roof fairing position is changed from −4.5 mm to +4.5 mm. Smoke wire and surface oil flow visualization were also performed to elucidate the flow characteristic around the truck-trailer with drag reduction devices. While the drag reduction rate of the truck trailer with half airfoil is up to 10 % higher than that of alone truck-trailer at all Reynolds number ranges, drag reduction of the truck trailer with the half airfoil and the roof fairing was exceeded 30 % as compared to the alone truck trailer. Drag coefficient results indicated that the half NACA 0009 and NACA 0012 airfoil has an almost similar trend at the zero-roof fairing position. Laminar separation bubble formation was observed on the surface of roof fairing with the help of surface oil flow visualization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Frontal area of the truck-trailer

C D :

Drag coefficient

C D_ATT :

Drag coefficient of the alone truck-trailer

CRF :

Cab roof fairing

DC :

Direct current

DR :

Drag reduction rate

F D :

Drag force

ρ :

Density of the air

LSB :

Laminar separation bubble

Re :

Reynolds number

RF :

Roof fairing

V :

Free stream velocity

References

  1. H. Choi, W. Jeon and J. Kim, Control of flow over a bluff body, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech., 40 (2008) 113–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Hucho and G. Sovran, Aerodynamics of road vehicles, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech, 25 (1993) 485–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Mohammadikalakoo, P. Schito and M. Mani, Passive flow control on Ahmed body by rear linking tunnels, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 205 (2020) 104330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Kim, J. Kim and S. J. Lee, Substantial drag reduction of a tractor-trailer vehicle using gap fairings, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 171 (2017) 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. J. Kim et al., Salient drag reduction of a heavy vehicle using modified cab-roof fairings, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 164 (2017) 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Landman et al., Understanding practical limits to heavy truck drag reduction, SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh., 2 (2) (2009).

  7. J. J. Kim, E. J. Lee and S. J. Lee, Wind tunnel tests on drag reduction of heavy vehicles using sinusoidal boat tails, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 34(1) (2020) 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Altaf, A. A. Omar and W. Asrar, Passive drag reduction of square back road vehicles, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 134 (2014) 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. McArthur et al., An experimental characterisation of the wake of a detailed heavy vehicle in cross-wind, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 175 (2018) 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Salati, F. Cheli and P. Schito, Heavy truck drag reduction obtained from devices installed on the trailer, SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh., 8 (2015) 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Salati et al., Wind tunnel experiment on a heavy truck equipped with front-rear trailer device, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 171 (2017) 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. J. Kim et al., Considerable drag reduction and fuel saving of a tractor-trailer using additive aerodynamic devices, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 191 (2019) 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. J. Kim, J. Hong and S. J. Lee, Bio-inspired cab-roof fairing of heavy vehicles for enhancing drag reduction and driving stability, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 131 (2017) 868–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. G. Hwang et al., Reduction of drag in heavy vehicles with two different types of advanced side skirts, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 155 (2016) 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. K. Sreejith and A. Sathyabhama, Experimental and numerical study of laminar separation bubble formation on low Reynolds number airfoil with leading-edge tubercles, J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 42(4) (2020) 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Sudhakar, N. Karthikeyan and P. Suriyanarayanan, Experimental studies on the effect of leading-edge tubercles on laminar separation bubble, AIAA J., 57(12) (2019) 5197–5207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Yi, W. SaGong and H.-C. Choi, Drag reduction of a three-dimensional car model using passive control device, Proc. KSME Conf. (2007) 2868–2872.

  18. S. K. Sinha and S. L. Sinha, Improving automotive fuel efficiency with deturbulator tape, SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-3458 (2007).

  19. S. Veluri et al., Preliminary rans simulations and experimental study of a simplified tractor/trailer geometry, AIAA Appl. Aerodyn. Conf. (2006) 3857.

  20. B. Cihan, Numerical drag reduction of a ground vehicle by NACA2415 airfoil structured vortex generator and spoiler, Int. J. Automot. Technol., 20(5) (2019) 943–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. H. Tsai et al., Computational aero-acoustic analysis of a passenger car with a rear spoiler, Appl. Math. Model., 33(9) (2009) 3661–3673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. R. Norwazan et al., Experimental and numerical analysis of lift and drag force of sedan car spoiler, Appl. Mech. Mater., 165 (2012) 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Buljac et al., Automobile aerodynamics influenced by airfoil-shaped rear wing, Int. J. Automot. Tech., 17(3) (2016) 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. The Don-Bur Aerodynamic Teardrop™, https://donbur.co.uk/gb-en/products/aerodynamic-teardrop-trailer.php (accessed on April 5th, 2021).

  25. J. Winslow et al., Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105), J. Aircr., 55(3) (2018) 1050–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Ohtake, Y. Nakae and T. Motohashi, Nonlinearity of the aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 aerofoil at low Reynolds numbers, Japan Soc. Aeronaut. Sp. Sci., 55(644) (2007) 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. S. West and C. J. Apelt, The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105, J. Fluid Mech., 114 (1982) 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Sudhakar, N. Karthikeyan and L. Venkatakrishnan, Influence of leading edge tubercles on aerodynamic characteristics of a high aspect-ratio UAV, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 69 (2017) 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R. M. Wood and S. X. S. Bauer, Simple and low-cost aerodynamic drag reduction devices for tractor-trailer trucks, SAE Trans. (2010) 143–160.

  30. R. Sosa and G. Artana, Steady control of laminar separation over airfoils with plasma sheet actuators, J. Electrostat., 64(7–9) (2006) 604–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Tunay, B. Sahin and V. Ozbolat, Effects of rear slant angles on the flow characteristics of Ahmed body, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 57 (2014) 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Seifert et al., Large Trucks Drag Reduction Using Active Flow Control, Springer, Berlin (2009) 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Seifert, T. Shtendel and D. Dolgopyat, From lab to full scale active flow control drag reduction: how to bridge the gap?, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 147 (2015) 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Howell, A. Sheppard and A. Blakemore, Aerodynamic drag reduction for a simple bluff body using base bleed, SAE Trans., 112 (2003) 1085–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. R. Cooper, Commercial Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction: Historical Perspective as a Guide, Springer (2004) 9–28.

  36. K. R. Cooper, Truck aerodynamics reborn — lessons from the past, SAE Trans. (2003) 132–142.

  37. J. Leuschen and K. R. Cooper, Full-scale wind tunnel tests of production and prototype, second-generation aerodynamic drag-reducing devices for tractor-trailers, SAE Tech. Pap. (2006) 3456.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of this work by the Scientific Research Projects Unit of Karadeniz Technical University with the contract number of 2007.112.003.2. The authors are grateful to Prof. Dr. Yahya Erkan Akansu for allowing the use of wind tunnel located at Mechanical Engineering Department of Niğde Omer Halisdemir University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Seyhan.

Additional information

Mehmet Seyhan received his B.Sc. degree and M.Sc. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Niğde University in 2013 and 2015, respectively. He is currently a Ph.D. student at Karadeniz Technical University, where he also works as research assistant. His research interests include plasma actuators for flow control, PEM fuel cells and flow control applications.

Mustafa Sarioglu is a Mechanical Engineer. He graduated from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Karadeniz University in 1984. He received his M.Sc. degree and Ph.D. degree from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Faculty of Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University in 1991 and 1997, respectively. His research interests include passive flow control. He is currently an Associated Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department of Karadeniz Technical University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seyhan, M., Sarioglu, M. Investigation of drag reduction performance of half NACA 0009 and 0012 airfoils placed over a trailer on the flow around truck-trailer. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 2971–2979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0620-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0620-2

Keywords

Navigation