Abstract
The debonding failure at the adhesive bonded joints between spar caps and shear webs is one of failure modes of the wind turbine rotor blades. To avoid such a failure, the numerical investigation of stress states at the adhesive bonded joints is important to assess the structural integrity of a rotor blade subjected to the extreme bending moments. In this paper, the simplified stress state calculation method was derived based on the multiaxial stress states of shear webs computed from the linear elastic composite analysis from ANSYS 19.2. From the close investigation of a small blade and a large blade, it turned out that the care must be taken evaluating stresses of a large blade with double shear webs than a small one with a single web. In case of a large blade, the adhesive structure between spar cap and a shear web close to an aft shear web (ASW) showed higher stresses compared to the adhesive part located to a forward shear web (FSW). Especially, the out-of-plane stresses of the adhesive at ASW were increased toward the outboard region of a blade, while the stress level of the adhesive at FSW was almost constant along the blade length, which is similar to a single shear web case of a small blade (< 25 m). It indicates the higher peeling failure possibility at the interface between the adhesive and an ASW when blade size is increased.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T.-K. Hoang, Q. Loic, L. Vido and C. Berriaud, Impact of the rotor blade technology on the levelized cost of energy of an offshore wind turbine, Joint International Conference OPTIMACEMP, Brasov, Romania, May (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM.2017.7975038.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, R&D Pathways for supersized wind turbine blades, DNVGL, Document No.: 10080081-HOU-R-01, March (2019).
K. Ha, M. Bätge, D. Melcher and S. Czichon, Development and feasibility study of segment blade test methodology, Wind Energy Science Journal, 5 (2020) 591–599, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-591-2020.
A. Lamarre, Improved inspection of composite wind turbine blades with accessible advanced ultrasonic phased array technology, 15 Asia Pacific Conference for Non-Destructive Testing (APCNDT2017), Singapore (2017).
A. S. Verma, N. P. Vedvik and Z. Gao, A comprehensive numerical investigation of the impact behaviour of an offshore wind turbine blade due to impact loads during installation, Ocean Engineering, 172 (2019) 127–145.
B. F. Sørensen, Materials and structures for wind turbine rotor blades—An overview, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh, UK, July (2009) 27–31.
P. U. Haselbach, Ultimate strength of wind turbine blades under multiaxial loading, DTU Wind Energy, Ph.D. Thesis, DTU (2015).
G. Abumeri and F. Abdi, Advanced composite wind turbine blade design based on durability and damage tolerance, AlphaSTAR Corporation Report (ASC-2011-DOE-1), US, November (2011).
D. Griffin, Blade System Design Studies Volume I-Composite technologies for Large Wind Turbine Blades, Sandia National Laboratories, USA, July (2002).
P. Richards, D. Griffith and D. Hodges, Aeroelastic design of large wind turbine blades considering damage tolerance: Damage tolerant design strategies for wind turbine blades, Wind Energy, 20 (1997) 10.1002/we.
J.-H. Jeong and S.-H. Kim, Optimization of thick wind turbine airfoils using a genetic algorithm, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32 (7) (2018) 3191–3199.
J.-H. Jeong and S.-H. Kim, CFD investigation on the flatback airfoil effect of 10 MW wind turbine blade, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32 (5) (2018) 2089–2097.
A. Mishra, G. Kumar and A. De, Prediction of separation induced transition on thick airfoil using non-linear URANS based turbulence model, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 33 (2019) 2169–2180, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0419-6.
Bladena, Wind Turbine Blades Handbook, Kirt&Thomsen, ISBN 978-87-971709-0-8 (2019).
D. Zarouchas and R. Nijssen, Mechanical behavior of thick structural adhesives in wind turbine blades under multi-axial loading, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Tayor & Francis, 30 (13) (2016).
L. P. Mikkelsen and L. Mishnaevsky Jr., Computational modelling of materials for wind turbine blades: selected DTU wind energy activities, MDPI-Materials, November (2017).
C. Bhat, D. Noronha and F. Saldanha, Structural performance evaluation of segmented wind turbine blade through finite element simulation, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 102, International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 9 (6) (2015) 996–1005.
G. Fernandez, D. Vandepitte, H. Usabiaga, B. V. Hooreweder and S. Debruyne, Experimental identification of static and dynamic strength of epoxy based adhesives in high thickness joints, Int. J. Solids. Struct., 120 (2017) 292–303.
L. Zhang, Y. Guo, J. Wang, X. Huang, X. Wei and W. Liu, Structural failure test of a 52.5 m wind turbine blade under combined loading, Engineering Failure Analysis, 103 (2019) 286–293, 20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.069.
J. Huang et al., Effect of adhesive layer properties on the shear strength of single-lap structures of dissimilar materials based on the cohesive zone model, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 35 (2021) 133–143, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-1212-2.
J. H. Lee et al., Adhesive interface-peeling properties of tapered double cantilever beam bonded with dissimilar material under in-plane and out-of-plane shear conditions, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 34 (2020) 2775–2782, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0610-9.
M. Peeters, G. Santo, J. Degroote and W. Van Paepegem, Comparison of shell and solid element models for the static certification tests of a 43 m wind turbine blade, Energies, 11 (2018) 1346, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061346.
L. P. Mikkelsen and L. Mishnaevsky Jr., Computational modelling of materials for wind turbine blades: selected DTU wind energy activities, MDPI-materials, November (2017).
D. Samborsky, A. Sears and J. Mandell, Static and fatigue testing of thick adhesive joints for wind turbine blades, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (2009) https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1550.
B. A. Bednarcyk, Simplified shear solution for determination of the shear stress distribution in a composite panel from the applied shear resultant, 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials, 7–10 April, Schaumburg, IL (2008) AIAA 2008–2168.
P. U. Haselbach, M. A. Eder and F. Belloni, A comprehensive investigation of trailing edge damage in a wind turbine rotor blade, Wind Energ., 19 (2016) 1871–1888, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1956.
M. Rosemeier, G. Basters and A. Antoniou, Benefits of subcomponent over full-scale blade testing elaborated on a trailing-edge bond line design validation, Wind Energy Science, 3 (2018) 163–172, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-163-2018.
F. Sayer, A. Antoniou and A. van Wingerde, Investigation of structural bond lines in wind turbine blades by sub-component tests, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 37 (2012) 129–135, ISSN 0143-7496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.021.
ANSYS Inc., http://www.ansys.com, Release18.1 (2018).
M. G. Droubi, C. Fosbrooke, J. McConnachie and N. H. Faisal, Indentation based strength analysis of adhesively bonded leading-edge composite joints in wind turbine blades, SN Applied Science, A Springer Nature Journal, June (2019).
V. Raman, M. Drissi-Habti, L. Guillaumat and A. Khadhour, Numerical simulation analysis as a tool to identify areas of weakness in a turbine wind-blade and solutions for their reinforcement, Composites Part B: Engineering, Elsevier (2016) 23–29.
J. Tomblin, P. Harter, W. Seneviratne and C. Yang, Characterization of bondline thickness effects in adhesive joints, J. Composites Tech. and Res., 24 (2002) 80–92.
S. K. Chakrapani, Investigation of ply waviness in wind turbine blades: experimental and numerical analysis, MS.C. Thesis, Iowa State University (2011).
J. M. Gere and B. Goodno, J. Mechanics of Materials (8th Eds), Cengage Learning (2013).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Brain Pool Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (grant number: 2019H1D3A2 A02102093), Korea. In addition, this study has been also supported by National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (grant number: 2020R1G1 A1099560), Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Kwangtae Ha is a Research Professor of the Floating Offshore Wind Energy System Engineering Department, University of Ulsan, He earned a Ph.D. at the Aerospace Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2005. His employment experience included the Groen Brothers Aviation, Caterpillar, Samsung Heavy Industry, Korea Aerospace Industry, and Fraunhofer Institute of Wind Energy System in Germany. He lead the 7MW Offshore Wind Turbine Development and also played a key role in Future Rotor Blade Concept Project at Fraunhofer IWES. His current research is a smart blade development for offshore wind turbine with composite structure tailoring and active materials.
Jae-Ho Jeong was born in Cheongju in the Republic of Korea, on September 27, 1982. He obtained his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu University in Japan, until 2010. He had worked at Samsung Heavy Industries until Aug. 2013, and had worked at the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute until Feb. 2020. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Gachon University in Korea. His current researches of interest are CFD and plant system transient analysis in the fields of renewable, nuclear, and hydrogen energy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ha, K., Jeong, JH. Stress states investigation of adhesive bonded joint between spar cap and shear webs of a large wind turbine rotor blade. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 2107–2114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0426-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0426-2