Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of cross-section loads for steel beam with simple cross-sectional shape based on measured strain and its application

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new strain gauge layout method on the structural surface is proposed to identify the six-component loads in cross-section. Numerical simulation of a cantilever beam and an industrial case study, i.e., identification of hinge joint loads on excavator working device under actual excavating condition, are presented to demonstrate the practicability of the proposed method for industrial scale problems. The hinge joint loads deduced from the stick’s six-component cross-section loads identified by the new method were compared with the values calculated by traditional method, and the recurrence degree of stress and fatigue cumulative damage of the stick’s fatigue critical points were also compared. The maximum deviation between the actual damage of each selected measuring point and the damage caused by the identified hinge joint loads was only 1.69 %. The field test results showed that the new method could be conveniently applied with high identification accuracy for complicated actual loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

F x :

Axial force

F y :

Shear force in horizontal plane

F z :

Shear force in vertical plane

M x :

Axial torque

M y :

Bending moment in horizontal plane

M z :

Bending moment in vertical plane

σ i :

Normal stress at i-th measuring point

T i :

Shear stress at i-th measuring point

A :

Effective area of the cross-section

A 0 :

Area enclosed by the midline in the thickness direction of each plate of the cross-section

I z :

Inertia moment of the whole cross-section to the z-axis

I y :

Inertia moment of the whole cross-section to the y-axis

y 1 :

Distance from no. 1 measuring point to z-axis

y 2 :

Distance from no. 2 measuring point to z-axis

z 3 :

Distance from no. 3 measuring point to y-axis

δ i :

Wall thickness at i-th measuring point

C i :

Sum of the widths of the webs at i-th measuring point

S y*:

Static moment of the section on one side of the y-axis to the y-axis

S z*:

Static moment of the section on one side of the z-axis to the z-axis

N :

The stress-load coefficient matrix of the cross-section

k j :

Coefficients in matrix N

ε i-0°:

Strain along the 0° directions of the i-th strain rosette

ε i-45°:

Strain along the 45° directions of the i-th strain rosette

ε i-90°:

Strain along the 0° directions of the i-th strain rosette

E :

Elastic modulus

μ :

Poisson’s ratio

b :

Width of the rectangular section

h :

Height of the rectangular section

α :

Coefficient related to the ratio h/b

F Kx2 :

Horizontal force along x2 direction at point K

F Kz2 :

Vertical force along z2 direction at point K

F Ky2 :

Lateral force along y2 direction at point K

M Kx2 :

Torque along x2 direction at point K

M Kz2 :

Bending moment along z2 direction at point K

F Fx2 :

Horizontal force along x2 direction at point F

F Fz2 :

Vertical force along z2 direction at point F

F Gx2 :

Horizontal force along x2 direction at point G

F Gz2 :

Vertical force along z2 direction at point G

F Pq :

Q-direction component of the force acting on point P

k Pq_i :

Proportional coefficient between the FPq and the stress of the i-th measuring point

M Pq :

Q-direction component of the moment acting on point P

k Pq_i’:

Proportional coefficient between the MPq and the stress of the i-th measuring point

σ i_new :

Stress of the i-th measuring point caused by all hinge joint loads identified by the new method proposed in this paper

σ i_old :

Stress of the i-th measuring point caused by all hinge joint loads identified by the traditional method

σ i_test :

Measured stresses at the i-th measuring point

References

  1. Z. C. Yang and Y. Jia, The identification of dynamic loads, Advances in Mechanics, 45(1), (2015) 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Mariusz and K. Mariusz, The loads identification acting on the 4x4 truck, Materials Today: Proceedings, 3(4), (2016) 1167–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Feng, H. Sun and M. Q. Feng, Simultaneous identification of bridge structural parameters and vehicle loads, Computers and Structures, 157, (2015) 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Wang, Q. Li and S. G. Sun, Study of multi-frequency exciting load identification based on dynamic stress response, J. of the China Railway Society, 2, (2015) 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Y. Yin, An identification method for transverse response moment of solid rocket during free flight state, J. of Astronautics, 31(7), (2010) 1706–1710.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Wentzel, Fatigue test load identification using weighted modal filtering based on stress, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 40(2), (2013) 618–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. X. S. Sun et al., Identification method of dynamic loads for stochastic structures based on matrix perturbation theory, J. of Mechanical Engineering, 50(13), (2014) 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. T. Chang and Y. J. Yan, A genetic algorithm based method for steady-state dynamic force identification in time domain, Chinese J. of Applied Mechanics, 29(3), (2012) 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. H. Noh and J. W. Hu, Tensile force identification in cable-stayed structures: hybrid system identification algorithm and experimental verification, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28(11), (2014) 4563–4572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Wang, Study on multi-frequency exciting load identification based on dynamic stress response, J. of the China Railway Society, 37(2), (2015) 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. P. Wan et al., Study on load measuring method and test of the pin-shaft in load working device, J. of Mechanical Strength, 39(1), (2017) 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. P. Yu et al., Test method of bucket force of loader, Engineering Machinery, 47(7), (2016) 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Peng, Y. J. Shi and Z. Chen, Force balance development of a certain airplane components in high speed wind tunnel, J. Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 23(4), (2009) 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. R. Hu, The optimization of load equation during aircraft flight load measurement, Acta Aeronautica ET Astronautica Sinica, 15(1), (1994) 102–105.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. J. Allen and R. P. Dibley, Modeling aircraft wing loads from flight data using neural networks, SAE Technical Papers (2003).

  16. B. Parida, S. D. Vishwakarma and S. Pal, Design and development of fixture and force measuring system for friction stir welding process using strain gauges, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29(2), (2015) 739–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. B. Liu, Y. L. Xing and Z. H. Shen, Identification of cross-section loads based on measured strain of missile body, Acta Armamentarii, 37(2), (2016) 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Wang, Q. Li and S. G. Sun, Study on brake force identification and distribution characteristic for metro bogie, Railway Locomotive and Car, 34(4), (2014) 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Yin, G. Y. Grondin and A. E. Elwi, Fatigue Crack Behavior in Mine Excavator, Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Yin et al., Fatigue life prediction of heavy mining equipment, part 1: fatigue load assessment and crack growth rate tests, J. of Constructional Steel Research, 63, (2007) 1494–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. D. Shi, Y. M. Bian and X. G. Jian, Testing and Analysis Technology of Mechanical Parameters, Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai, China (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. X. Z. Zhang, Mechanics of Materials, Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, Xian, Shaanxi, China (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Q. Y. Xiang et al., Load spectrum test method of excavator working device, China J. of Highway and Transport, 30(9), (2017) 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Z. G. Ren et al., Dynamic stress test transient analysis of hydraulic excavator, J. of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 42(1), (2014) 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Jiang, X. B. Liu and G. P. Zhou, Fatigue life study on excavator booms under actual loading, Chinese J. of Construction Machinery, 12(3), (2014) 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology (Research on Key Technology of Earth-moving Machinery Fatigue Reliability (No. 2015BAF07B02)), China, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 300102250101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingyi Xiang.

Additional information

Qingyi Xiang is a lecturer in the School of Construction Machinery, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Chang’an University. Her research interests include load spectrum, structural strength and fatigue reliability of construction machinery, and fracture properties of welded joints.

Pengmin Lu is a Professor, Ph.D. supervisor of Chang’an University, and a Post Doctor of Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Southwest Jiaotong University. His research interests include structural strength and fatigue reliability of construction machinery, and bridge construction machinery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, Q., Lu, P. & Wang, B. Identification of cross-section loads for steel beam with simple cross-sectional shape based on measured strain and its application. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 5017–5028 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-1106-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-1106-3

Keywords

Navigation