Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of back pressure fluctuation on pseudo-shock waves in a rectangular duct

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pseudo-shock waves in a scramjet isolator are worth studying. These waves are generally subjected to back pressure fluctuation induced by combustion. The characteristics and unsteadiness mechanism of pseudo-shock waves are investigated using a numerical method. A second nozzle with a movable pintle is utilized to simulate the back pressure fluctuation of a combustion chamber in the numerical model. A 2D numerical method with the kω-shear stress transport turbulence model is adopted to investigate the behavior of pseudo-shock waves. Validation of the numerical model is performed by comparing its results with existing experimental results. The accuracy of the numerical model is proven. The present study aims to investigate the unsteady characteristics of pseudo-shock waves in a scramjet isolator. As indicated by the results, the amplitude of pseudo-shock wave motion can be reduced by increasing the exciting frequency of back pressure fluctuation. The influence mechanism of exciting frequency is the phase difference caused by time delay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A s :

Amplitude of shock train leading edge oscillation

A th :

Throat area of the first nozzle

A* :

Throat area of the second nozzle

C :

Sound speed

f b :

Exciting frequency of fluctuating back pressure

H th :

Throat height of the first nozzle

H* :

Throat height of the second nozzle

L :

Length of the entire test section

L 1 :

Length of the first section

L 2 :

Length of the second section

L 3 :

Length of the third section

P :

Static pressure

P i,0 :

Stagnation pressure at the inlet

t :

Time

T :

Duration of one period

U :

Speed of subsonic flow where disturbances propagate

V :

Propagation velocity of pressure disturbances

x:

Coordinate along the x-axis

Xs :

Coordinate of shock train leading edge along the x-axis

α 1 :

Half divergence angle of the first section

α 2 :

Half divergence angle of the second section

α 3 :

Half divergence angle of the third section

STLE:

Shock train leading edge

TR:

Throat area ratio

References

  1. K. Matsuo, Y. Miyazato and H. D. Kim, Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 35 (1999) 33–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. F. Quaatz, M. Giglmaier, S. Hickel and N. A. Adams, Largeeddy simulation of a pseudo-shock system in a Laval nozzle, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 49 (2014) 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Deng, Y. Jin and H. D. Kim, Optimization study on the isolator length of dual-mode scramjet, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31(2) (2017) 697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Weiss, A. Grzona and H. Olivier, Behavior of shock trains in a diverging duct, Exp Fluids, 49 (2010) 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. S. Geerts and K. H. Yu, Shock train length measurements and improved correlations for rectangular ducts, 22nd ISABE Conference, Phoenix, USA (2015).

  6. T. C. Hoeger, P. I. King, D. D. Decker, J. M. Donbar and S. C. Stouffer, CFD modeling of an isolator shock train in a scramjet engine, 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Nashville, TN, USA (2010).

  7. K. C. Lin, C. J. Tam, K. R. Jackson, D. R. Eklund and T. A. Jackson, Characterization of shock train structures inside constant-area isolators of model scramjet combustors, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA (2006).

  8. H. D. Kim, K. Matsuo, S. Kawagoe and T. Kinosita, Flow unsteadiness by weak normal shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in internal flow, International Journal of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 34(4) (1991) 457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Xiong, X. Fan, Z. Wang and Y. Tao, Analysis and modelling of unsteady shock train motions, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 846 (2018) 240–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Bur, R. Benay, A. Galli and P. Berthouze, Experimental and numerical study of forced shock-wave oscillations in a transonic channel, Aerospace Science and Technology, 10 (2006) 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Klomparens, J. F. Driscoll and M. Gamba, Response of a shock train to downstream back pressure forcing, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA (2016).

  12. W. Y. Su, Y. X. Ji and Y. Chen, Effects of dynamic backpressure on pseudoshock oscillations in scramjet inlet-isolator, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 32(2) (2016) 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. J. Tam, D. Eklund and R. Behdadnia, Influence of downstream boundary conditions on scramjet-isolator simulations, 26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honoluu, Hawaii, USA (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1713211 and 61673300) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (18DZ1200804).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruoyu Deng.

Additional information

Ruoyu Deng obtained his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, China in 2013. He obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Andong National University, Korea in 2017. Dr. Deng is currently a postdoctoral student in Tongji University, China. His research interests include thrust vector control, ramjets and scramjets, fluid power, and mechatronic systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, R., Kim, H.D. & Chen, Q. Effects of back pressure fluctuation on pseudo-shock waves in a rectangular duct. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 4649–4655 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-1023-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-1023-5

Keywords

Navigation