Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental observation of oil mist penetration ability in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) spray

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) is an eco-friendly cooling and lubricating method that has its importance in machining sustainability. However, the behavior of the MQL droplets remains questionable. The present study is conducted to investigate the penetration performance of MQL with different combination of spray parameters and capillary sizes. An observation platform has been designed, which makes the overall penetration process controllable. The results have shown that the shortest penetration time was obtained with larger capillary size, higher air flow rate and the corresponding smaller droplet size. However, the increase of air flow rate has the optimal value when the objective is to penetrate to 1 mm deep from the entrance, whereas it has not shown the similar regulation when the droplet flowed deeper to the center due to the long transport distance has amplified the effects of multiple influence factors. The observation results were verified through simulation and cutting experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Klocke and G. Eisenblatter, Dry cutting, Cirp Annals 1997 — Manufacturing Technology, 46(2) (1997) 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Weinert, I. Inasaki, J. W. Sutherland and T. Wakabayashi, Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication, Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 53(2) (2004) 511–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Damir, S. Lancereau, H. Attia and P. Hendrick, On the performance of minimum quantity lubrication in milling Al 6061, Proceedings CIRP-2nd International Conference on Process Machine Interactions, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Attanasio, M. Gelfi, C. Giardini and C. Remino, Minimal quantity lubrication in turning: Effect on tool wear, Wear, 260(3) (2006) 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. A. Rahim and H. Dorairaju, Evaluation of mist flow characteristic and performance in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) machining, Measurement, 123 (2018) 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Obikawa, Y. Asano and Y. Kamata, Computer fluid dynamics analysis for efficient spraying of oil mist in finish-turning of Inconel 718, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 49(12–13) (2009) 971–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. J. Pei, C. G. Shen, W. J. Zheng and G. C. Wang, CFD analysis and experimental investigation of jet orientation in MQL machining, Advanced Materials Research (2010) 462–466.

  8. Y. Iskandar, A. Tendolkar, M. H. Attia, P. Hendrick, A. Damir and C. Diakodimitris, Flow visualization and characterization for optimized MQL machining of composites, Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 63(1) (2014) 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. H. Park, J. Olortegui-Yume, M. C. Yoon and P. Kwon, A study on droplets and their distribution for minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 50(9) (2010) 824–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Y. Zhu, S. M. Yuan and B. C. Chen, Numerical and experimental optimizations of nozzle distance in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) milling process, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101(1–4) (2019) 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Tasdelen, T. Wikblom and S. Ekered, Studies on minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) and air cooling at drilling, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 200(1–3) (2008) 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. N. Gaitonde, S. R. Karnik and J. P. Davim, Selection of optimal MQL and cutting conditions for enhancing machinability in turning of brass, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 204(1–3) (2008) 459–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Yan, S. Yuan and Q. Liu, Tool wear and chip formation in green machining of high strength steel, Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao (Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering), 46 (2010) 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Hadad and B. Sadeghi, Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI 4140 steel alloy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 54 (2013) 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Q. Liu, J. Y. Xu, S. Han and M. Chen, A coupling method of response surfaces (CRSM) for cutting parameters optimization in machining titanium alloy under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) condition, International Journal of Precision Engineering And Manufacturing, 14(5) (2013) 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. S. Lin, C. Y. Wang, Y. H. Yuan, Z. H. Chen, Q. M. Wang and W. Q. Xiong, Tool wear in Ti-6Al-4V alloy turning under oils on water cooling comparing with cryogenic air mixed with minimal quantity lubrication, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(1–4) (2015) 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Leppert, Surface layer properties of AISI 316L steel when turning under dry and with minimum quantity lubrication conditions, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 226(4) (2012) 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Mia, Mathematical modeling and optimization of MQL assisted end milling characteristics based on RSM and Taguchi method, Measurement, 121 (2018) 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Bhowmick and A. T. Alpas, The role of diamond-like carbon coated drills on minimum quantity lubrication drilling of magnesium alloys, Surface & Coatings Technology, 205(23–24) (2011) 5302–5311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. A. Sanchez, I. Pombo, R. Alberdi, B. Izquierdo, N. Ortega, S. Plaza and J. Martinez-Toledano, Machining evaluation of a hybrid MQL-CO2 grinding technology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(18) (2010) 1840–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Tawakoli, M. J. Hadad and M. H. Sadeghi, Influence of oil mist parameters on minimum quantity lubrication — MQL grinding process, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 50(6) (2010) 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. Q. Liu, X. J. Cai, M. Chen and Q. L. An, Investigation of cutting force and temperature of end-milling Ti-6Al-4V with different minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) parameters, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(8) (2011) 1273–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. J. Zheng, H. J. Pei, G. C. Wang and C. G. Shen, Effect of flow field on cutting fluid penetration during minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) machining, Advanced Materials Research, (2011) 61–66.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant No. 2018YFB2002203; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 51475030. The authors are indebted to the financial support in the accomplishment of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songmei Yuan.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Chongdu Cho

Songmei Yuan is a Professor of School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation at Beihang University, China. She received her Ph.D. from Harbin Institute of Technology. Her research interests include advanced machining technology and equipment, interdisciplinary in medicine and engineering and intelligent micro-actuator.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, G., Yuan, S., Kong, X. et al. Experimental observation of oil mist penetration ability in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) spray. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 3217–3225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0713-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0713-3

Keywords

Navigation