Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element model updating of jointed structure based on modal and strain frequency response function

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To acquire a reasonable model for structural dynamic strength analysis, a bottom-up finite element modeling and updating methodology based on multi responses is proposed. The fundamental principles of structural dynamics analysis and model updating were introduced, and the proposed strategy was applied to the case study of an L-shaped jointed structure. Components of the jointed structure were modeled sequentially, and inaccurate model parameters were updated based on the corresponding experimental modal results in the first stage. In the second stage, components were connected together by bolts. The joint interfaces were represented by thin-layer elements, and local joint parameters were updated based on strain frequency response function (FRF). Finally, the precision of finite element model (FEM) was validated by acceleration frequency response function. The results indicated that the proposed methodology is able to reduce model simulation errors in both components and the overall jointed structure. Not only can the updated model of a jointed structure reproduce the experimental results used in updating, but also predict responses that are not used in the process of model updating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

M :

Mass matrix of a system

C :

Damping matrix of a system

K :

Stiffness matrix of a system

X :

Nodal displacement vector

F :

Exciting force vector

s :

Transformation factor

Φ :

Mode shape matrix

Q :

Modal coordinate matrix

M r :

The r-th modal mass

C r :

The r-th modal damping

K r :

The r-th modal stiffness

ϕ r :

The r-th mode shape

ω r :

The r-th modal frequency

ζ r :

The r-th modal damping ratio

H X :

Displacement FRF

\(\varepsilon _i^e\) :

The strain at any point within i-th element

B :

Mapping matrix between displacement and strain

\({\boldsymbol{x}}_i^e\) :

Nodal displacement vector of i-th element in the elemental coordinate

n g :

The number of elements sharing the j-th node

\(\varepsilon _{i,g}^e\) :

Nodal strain value of j-th node in g-th element

x l :

Nodal displacement in elemental coordinate

x :

Nodal displacement in global coordinate

T l :

Mapping matrix between elemental and global coordinate

ε j :

Strain matrix at the j-th node

ε :

Strain matrix of the system

H ε :

Strain FRF

ω A :

Simulative modal frequency

ω E :

Experimental modal frequency

E ω :

Modal frequency error

\(\phi _A^a\) :

The a-th mode shape of simulation

\(\phi _E^b\) :

The b-th mode shape of experimental test

MAC :

Modal assurance criterion

SC :

Shape correlation of FRF

AC :

Amplitude correlation of FRF

\({\boldsymbol{H}}_A^p\) :

The p-th column of simulative FRF matrix

\({\boldsymbol{H}}_E^q\) :

The q-th column of experimental FRF matrix

θ :

Updating parameters

R a :

Simulative results used for updating

R e :

Experimental results used for updating

lb :

Lower boundary of updating parameters

ub :

Upper boundary of updating parameters

W f :

Weighting factor

G :

Error of structural characteristic or response

N r :

The number of frequencies used in FEM updating

N p :

The number of columns used in FRF based updating

References

  1. W. L. Oberkampf and C. J. Roy, Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. S. I. Gravitz, An analytical procedure for orthogonalization of experimentally measured modes, J. of the Aerospace Sciences, 25 (11) (1958) 721–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Waeytens, B. Rosić, P. E. Charbonnel, E. Merliot, D. Siegert, X. Chapeleau, R. Vidal, V. le Corvec and L. M. Cottineau, Model updating techniques for damage detection in concrete beam using optical fiber strain measurement device, Engineering Structures, 129 (2016) 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Malveiro, D. Ribeiro, R. Calçada and R. Delgado, Updating and validation of the dynamic model of a railway viaduct with precast deck, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10 (11) (2014) 1484–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Z. Fu, Z. R. Lu and J. K. Liu, Damage identification in plates using finite element model updating in time domain, J. of Sound and Vibration, 332 (26) (2013) 7018–7032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Sanayei and M. J. Saletnik, Parameter estimation of structures from static strain measurements. I formulation, J. of Structural Engineering, 122 (5) (1996) 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Sanayei, J. E. Phelps, J. D. Sipple, E. S. Bell and B. R. Brenner, Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements, J. of Bridge Engineering, 17 (1) (2012) 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. X. Ren, S. E. Fang and M. Y. Deng, Response surface-based finite element model updating using structural static responses, J. of Engineering Mechanics, 137 (4) (2011) 248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Ribeiro, R. Calçada, R. Delgado, M. Brehm and V. Zabel, Finite element model updating of a bowstring-arch railway bridge based on experimental modal parameters, Engineering Structures, 40 (2012) 413–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ha, Y. Park and Y. Park, Model updating with closed loop strain mode shapes, J. of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 30 (4) (2007) 1206–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Esfandiari, F. Bakhtiari-Nejad, A. Rahai and M. Sanayei, Structural model updating using frequency response function and quasi-linear sensitivity equation, J. of Sound and Vibration, 326 (3–5) (2009) 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Li, F. Liu and S. Hu, Employing incomplete complex modes for model updating and damage detection of damped structures, Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 51 (12) (2008) 2254–2268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Oh, M. Kim, Y. Kim, T. Cho and H. Park, Model updating technique based on modal participation factors for beam structures, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 30 (2015) 733–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. J. Yi, Y. Zhou, S. Kunnath and B. Xu, Identification of localized frame parameters using higher natural modes, En-gineering Structures, 30 (11) (2008) 3082–3094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Guo, Z. Yang, Y. Jia and L. Wang, Model updating using correlation analysis of strain frequency response function, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 70–71 (2016) 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Xiao, Y. L. Xu and Q. Zhu, Multiscale modeling and model updating of a cable stayed bridge. II: Model updating using modal frequencies and influence lines, J. of Bridge Engineering, 20 (10) (2015) 04014113–1–04014113–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sanayei, A. Khaloo, M. Gul and F. N. Catbas, Automated finite element model updating of a scale bridge model using measured static and model test data, Engineering Structures, 102 (2015) 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. G. Bakir, E. Reynders and G. D. Roeck, Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm, J. of Sound and Vibration, 305 (1–2) (2007) 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Pal, G. W. Wathugala and S. Kundu, Calibration of a constitutive model using genetic algorithms, Computers and Geotechnics, 19 (4) (1996) 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Perera, E. Sevillano, A. Arteaga and A. D. Diego, Identification of intermediate debonding damage in FRP-plate RC beams based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization without updated baseline model, Composites Part B: Engineering, 62 (2014) 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. C. Jung, H. Yoon, H. Oh, G. Lee, M. Yoo, B. D. Youn and Y. C. Huh, Hierarchical model calibration for designing piezoelectric energy harvester in the presence of variability in material properties and geometry, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53 (1) (2016)161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Chakhari, A. Daidié, Z. Chaib and J. Guillot, Numerical model for two-bolted joints subjected to compressive loading, Finite Elements in Analysis & Design, 44 (4) (2008) 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. M. Alamdari, J. Li, B. Samali, H. Ahmadian and A. Naghavi, Nonlinear joint model updating in assembled structures, J. of Engineering Mechanics, 140 (7) (2014) 4014042-1-4014042–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. D. Cook, D. S. Malkus, M. E. Plesha and R. J. Witt, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 4th Ed., Wiley, New Jersey, USA (2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Grafe, Model Updating of Large Structural Dynamics Models Using Measured Response Functions, University of London, London (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. H. Mayer and L. Gaul, Segment-to-segment contact elements for modelling joint interfaces in finite element analysis, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21 (2) (2007) 724–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. G. Sharma and C. S. Desai, Analysis and implementation of thin-layer element for interfaces and joints. J. of Engineering Mechanics, 118 (12) (1992) 2442–2462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Z. Cao, Q. Fei, D. Jiang and S. Wu, Substructure-based model updating using residual flexibility mixed-boundary method, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (2) (2017) 759–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505398, U1530122), and the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20150968003, 20172852024). The authors also gratefully thank the editors and reviewers of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo Qintao.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Kyoung-Su Park

Zhan Ming has a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China. His research interests are in areas of finite element modeling and simulation, model updating and validation and structural dynamic optimization design.

Guo Qintao is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China. His research interests are in areas of finite element modeling and simulation, model updating and validation and structural dynamic optimization design.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ming, Z., Qintao, G., Lin, Y. et al. Finite element model updating of jointed structure based on modal and strain frequency response function. J Mech Sci Technol 33, 4583–4593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0902-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0902-0

Keywords

Navigation