Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 9, pp 4155–4164 | Cite as

Experimental study on ultrasonic signal measurement and longitudinal wave transfer in air-CH4 mixture space

  • Kwonse Kim
  • Dooseuk Choi
  • Seokyeon ImEmail author
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

This current work offers the experimental method which is capable of measuring the air-methane gas using L-wave by an ultrasound sensor in a constant volume chamber (CVC). For experimental method, a constant volume chamber is integrated with of a high-sensitive ultrasound sensor, a conventional ultrasound sensor, a non-resistance cable, a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor and two mounted zigs. The main conditions, for the experiment defined in this work, are composed of 2 bar of initial pressure, 296 K of temperature, air-CH4 mixture of gas fuel, 25 V of input voltage, 3 Hz of pulse rate and 0.2-2 of measurement distance (m) for two different ultrasonic sensors. The resonant frequency is set 67.6, 70.6, 73.6 and 76.6 kHz by adjusting wavelength inside the circuit system. It is shown that sensitivity in ethylene vinyl acetate matching layer (EVAM) type is remarkably increased comparing with the chemical wood matching layer (CWM) type. Moreover, in comparison to the conventional CWM type, the amplitude height of EVAM type shows 1.19 V at 1st, 1.05 V at 2nd, 0.63 V of 3rd, 0.40 V at 4th and 0.27 V at 5th in CVC. With regards to the average percentage, the EVAM type is shown up to 116, 250, 270,263 and 350 % for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th comparing with the conventional. Consequently, the voltage characteristics improved by EVAM type layer is demonstrated that energy transfer is higher than CWM type in CVC and efficiently led to increasing the ultrasonic sensitivity in an air-methane mixture.

Keywords

Gas fuel measurement Ultrasound sensor Natural gas Constant volume chamber Chemical wood matching layer (CWML) Ethylene vinyl acetate matching layer (EVAM) Acoustic impedance Energy transfer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2017R1D1 A1B03031156) and by the BB21+ Project in 2018.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Zhang, G. Pei and L. Zhang, Molecular dynamics simulation of methane gas flow in nanopores, Petroleum (2018).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Demirbas, Methane hydrates as potential energy resource: Part 2 - Methane production processes from gas hydrates, Energy Convers. Manag., 51 (7) (2010) 1562–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Z. Zakaria, M. Idroas, A. Samsuri and A. A. Adam, Ultrasonic instrumentation system for liquefied petroleum gas level monitoring, J. Nat. GasSci. Eng., 45 (2017) 428–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. K.-K. Figueiredo, A. V. Alvarenga and R. P. B. Costa-Felix, Ultrasonic attenuation and sound velocity assessment for mixtures of gasoline and organic compounds, Fuel, 191 (2017) 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P.-E. Martinsson and J. Delsing, Ultrasonic measurements of molecular relaxation in ethane and carbon monoxide, Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (2002).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. G. Pereira, F. Hamerski, E. F. Andrade, A. D. P. Scheer and M. L. Corazza, Assessment of subcritical propane, ultrasound-assisted and Soxhlet extraction of oil from sweet passion fruit (Passiflora alata Curtis) seeds, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 128 (2017) 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. C. Simon, Y. N. Wang, B. W. Cunitz, J. Thiel, F. Starr, Z. Liu and M. R. Bailey, Effect of carbon dioxide on the twinkling artifact in ultrasound imaging of Kidney stones: A pilot study, Ultrasound Med. Biol, 43 (5) (2017) 877–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    T. K. Jagannathan, S. Mohanan and R. Nagarajan, Mechanistic modeling of destratification in cryogenic storage tanks using ultrasonics, Ultrasonics, 54 (1) (2014) 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Asami and H. Miura, Study of ultrasonic machining by longitudinal-torsional vibration for processing brittle materials-observation of machining marks, Phys. Procedia, 70 (2015) 118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    V. Kaikaris, D. Samsanavicius, K. Maslauskas, R. Rim-deika, S. Valiukeviciene, J. Makstiene and J. Pundzius, Measurement of melanoma thickness - comparison of two methods: Ultrasound versus morphology, J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg, 64 (6) (2011) 796–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    K. Ohta, G. Isobe, P. Bornmann, T. Hemsel and T. Morita, Study on optimizing ultrasonic irradiation period for thick polycrystalline PZT film by hydrothermal method, Ultrasonics, 53 (4) (2013) 837–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    L. He, Y. Zhou, Z. Huang, J. Wang and Y. Yang, An ultrasonic level measuring technique based on radiation dissipation and its industrial application, Flow Meas. Instrum., 40 (2014) 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Shan, L. Xiang, Z. Changping and Z. Jiahua, Gas concentration detection using ultrasonic based on wireless sensor networks, The 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, IEEE (2010).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Boussouar, F. Meziane and G. Crofts, Plantar fascia segmentation and thickness estimation in ultrasound images, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph, 56 (2017) 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    I. J. O’sullivan and W. M. D. Wright, Ultrasonic measurement of gas flow using electrostatic transducers, Ultrasonics, 40 (1-8) (2002) 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Z. Zhang and X. Tan, Review of high power pulse transformer design, Phys. Procedia, 32 (2012) 566–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. Kim, D. Choi and S. Im, The application of ultrasonic waves and envelope energies in a closed chamber based on an air/methane mixture, Ultrasonics, 91 (2019) 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    H. J. Fang, Y. Chen, C. M. Wong, W. B. Qiu, H. L. W. Chan, Y. J. Dai and Q. F. Yan, Anodic aluminum oxideepoxy composite acoustic matching layers for ultrasonic transducer application, Ultrasonics, 70 (2016) 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J. E. Carlson, J. Martinsson and M. L. Nordenvaad, Measurement of methane content in upgraded biogas using pulse-echo ultrasound, International Congres on Ultrasonics (2007).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    X. He, J. Shi, L. Wu, P. Jiang and B. Liu, Study on synergistic toughening of polypropylene with high-density polyethylene and elastomer-olefin block copolymers under ultrasonic application, Compos. Sci. Technol, 161 (2018) 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    S. L. Oswal, R. L. Gardas and R. P. Phalak, Densities, speeds of sound, isentropic compressibilities, refractive indices and viscosities of binary mixtures of tetrahydrofuran with hydrocarbons at 30315 K, J. Mol. Liq., 116 (2) (2005) 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    X.-H. Min, H. Kato, N. Narisawa and K. Kageyama, Realtime ultrasonic measurement during tensile testing of aluminum alloys,Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 392 (1-2) (2005) 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    L. Labarrere, T. Poinsot, A. Dauptain, F. Duchaine, M. Bellenoue and B. Boust, Experimental and numerical study of cyclic variations in a constant volume combustion chamber, Combust. Flame, 172 (2016) 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    L. Weng, J. Zhang and W.-H. Zhang, An ultrasound-conductivity method for measuring gas holdup in a microbubble-based gas-liquid system, Can. J. Chem. Eng, 96 (4) (2018) 1005–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    H. Kim, K. Kim and D. Choi, Signal analysis of ultrasonic sensor according to pressure change in CNG tank using attenuation characteristics of ultrasound, Journal ofAdv Research in Dynamical and Control System, 9 (Special Issue 08-Special Issue) (2017) 101–107.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Michaud, T. Leong, P. Swiergon, P. Juliano and K. Knoerzer, Design parameters of stainless steel plates for maximizing high frequency ultrasound wave transmission, Ultrason. Sonochem., 26 (2015) 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    H. D. Setiabudi, C. C. Chong, S. M. Abed, L. P. Teh and S. Y. Chin, Comparative study of Ni-Ce loading method: Beneficial effect of ultrasonic-assisted impregnation method in C02 reforming of CH4 over Ni-Ce/SBA-15, J. Environ. Chem. Eng, 6 (1) (2018) 745–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Y. Xu, P. Yu, Z. Zhu, C. Yuan and T. Zhang, Over-reading modeling of the ultrasonic flow meter in wet gas measurement, Measurement, 98 (2017) 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Z. Tang, C. Zhai, Q. Zou and L. Qin, Changes to coal pores and fracture development by ultrasonic wave excitation using nuclear magnetic resonance, Fuel, 186 (2016) 571–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Y. Jia, V. Chernyshev and M. Skliar, Ultrasound measurements of segmental temperature distribution in solids: Method and its high-temperature validation, Ultrasonics, 66 (2016) 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. Larsson, B. Heyde, F. Kremer, L. A. Brodin and J. D’hooge, Ultrasound speckle tracking for radial, longitudinal and circumferential strain estimation of the carotid artery -An in vitro validation via sonomicrometry using clinical and high-frequency ultrasound, Ultrasonics, 56 (2015) 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSME & Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Automotive Engineering DepartmentKorea International University in FerghanaFerghana CityUzbekistan
  2. 2.Division of Mechanical & Automotive EngineeringKongju National UniversityChungnamKorea
  3. 3.Automotive Engineering DepartmentTongmyong UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations