Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a kernel density estimation with hybrid estimated bounded data

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification, which identifies a probabilistic distribution for uncertain data, is important for yielding accurate and reliable results in reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization. Sufficient data are needed for accurate uncertainty quantification, but data is very limited in engineering fields. For statistical modeling using insufficient data, kernel density estimation (KDE) with estimated bounded data (KDE-ebd) has been recently developed for more accurate and conservative estimation than the original KDE by combining given data and bounded data within estimated intervals of random variables from the given data. However, the estimated density function using KDE-ebd is modeled beyond the domain of random variables due to conservative estimation of the density function with long and thick tails. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes kernel density estimation with hybrid estimated bounded data (KDE-Hebd), which does not violate the domain of the random variables, and uses point or interval estimation of the bounds for generating the bounded data. KDE-ebd often yields too wide bounds for very insufficient data or large variations because it uses only the estimated intervals of random variables. The proposed KDE with hybrid estimated bounded data alternatively selects a point estimator or interval estimator according to whether the estimated intervals violate the domain of the random variables. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated by comparing the estimation accuracy from statistical simulation tests for mathematically derived sample data and real experimental data using KDE, KDE-ebd and KDE-Hebd. As a result, it was demonstrated that KDE-Hebd was more accurate than KDE-ebd without the violation of the domain of random variables, especially for a large coefficient of variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. E. Hess, D. Bruchman, I. A. Assakkaf and B. M. Ayyub, Uncertainties in material and geometric strength and load variables, Naval Engineers Journal, 114 (2) (2002) 139–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Lukić and C. Cremona, Probabilistic assessment of welded joints versus fatigue and fracture, Journal of Structural Engineering, 127 (2) (2001) 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Noh, K. K. Choi and I. Lee, Identification of marginal and joint CDFs using Bayesian method for RBDO, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 40 (1) (2010) 35–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Q. Jiwei, Z. Jianguo and M. Yupeng, Reliability analysis based on the principle of maximum entropy and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32 (2) (2018) 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. K. Choi and H. H. Yoo, Uncertainty analysis of nonlinear systems employing the first–order reliability method, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26 (1) (2012) 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. C. Jung, D. Lee, B. D. Youn and S. Lee, A statistical characterization method for damping material properties and its application to structural–acoustic system design, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25 (8) (2011) 1893–1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. J. Kang, O. K. Lim and Y. Noh, Sequential statistical modeling method for distribution type identification, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 54 (6) (2016) 1587–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. J. Kang, J. Hong, O. K. Lim and Y. Noh, Reliability analysis using parametric and nonparametric input modeling methods, Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 30 (1) (2017) 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Chen, Y. F. Li and H. Z. Haung, Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on kernel density estimation and Kullback–Leibler divergence, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28 (11) (2014) 4441–4454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. G. Cho, J. Jang, S. Kim, S. Park, T. H. Lee, M. Lee and S. Hong, Nonparametric approach for uncertainty–based multidisciplinary design optimization considering limited data, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 54 (6) (2016) 1671–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Jang, S. G. Cho, S. J. Lee, K. S. Kim, J. M. Kim, J. P. Hong and T. H. Lee, Reliability based robust design optimization with kernel density estimation for electric power steering motor considering manufacturing uncertainties, IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, 51 (3) (2015) 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. J. Kang, Y. Noh and O. K. Lim, Kernel density estimation with bounded data, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57 (1) (2018) 95–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. B. W. Silverman, Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, CRC press, London, 26 (1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. M. P. Wand and M. C. Jones, Kernel smoothing, CRC press, London (1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Chen, Optimal bandwidth selection for kernel density functionals estimation, Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2015 (2015) 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A. C. Guidoum, Kernel estimator and bandwidth selection for density and its derivatives, Department of Probabilities & Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene, Algeria, https://cran.rproject. org/web/packages/kedd/vignettes/kedd.pdf (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. E. Hansen, Lecture notes on nonparametrics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, WI, USA, http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~bhansen/718/NonParametrics1.pdf (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. J. Sheather, Density estimation, Statistical Science, 19 (4) (2004) 588–597.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. H. Jung, Y. J. Kang, O. K. Lim and Y. Noh, A new method to determine the number of experimental data using statistical modeling methods. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (6) (2017) 2901–2910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. W. Tukey, Exploratory data analysis, Pearson, New York (1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Frigge, D. C. Hoaglin and B. Lglewicz, Some implementations of the boxplot, The American Statistician, 43 (1) (1989) 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Socie, Probabilistic statistical simulations technical background, eFatigue LLC (2008) https://www.efatigue. com/probabilistic/background/strainlife.html, April (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. C. Montgomery and G. C. Runger, Applied statistics and probability for engineers, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York (2003).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoojeong Noh.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Byeng Dong Youn

Young-Jin Kang received his Ph.D. degree in School of Mechanical Engineering from Pusan National University in 2018. He is currently a postdoctoral researcher in School of Mechanical Engineering at Pusan National University. His research area is uncertainty quantification, reliability analysis, and design under uncertainties.

Yoojeong Noh is an Assistant Professor in School of Mechanical Engineering of Pusan National University. Her research area is uncertainty quantification and design under uncertainties.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, YJ., Noh, Y. & Lim, OK. Development of a kernel density estimation with hybrid estimated bounded data. J Mech Sci Technol 32, 5807–5815 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1128-2

Keywords

Navigation