Skip to main content
Log in

Shakedown analysis of a wind turbine gear considering strain-hardening and the initial residual stress

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under some heavy-duty conditions, the shakedown state may occur on gears such as those used in a megawatt wind turbine gearbox. The plastic deformation and the residual stress formed within the shakedown process further influence the contact behavior and the service life of the gear. The initial residual stress caused by the heat treatment of the case-hardening gear, together with the strain-hardening constitutive behavior of the material, have a combined effect on the shakedown state. A two-dimensional elastic-plastic contact numerical model was developed for a case-hardened wind turbine gear to study effects of the initial residual stress and the strain-hardening properties. Plastic strain and residual stress are calculated at each loading cycle without the consideration of the tooth friction. The initial yield limit and the hardening modulus of the material were obtained through a tension test on a universal tensile test machine. The initial residual stress distribution was measured with the X ray diffraction method and then embedded in the finite element model. The results show that strain-hardening behavior can significantly improve the shakedown performance, and the larger the hardening modulus is, the less the maximum plastic strain is at the final shakedown state. Initial residual compressive stress is helpful to improve the shakedown performance, while initial residual tensile stress has negative influence on the shakedown performance. As the normal load increases, the influence of the initial residual stress on the shakedown state becomes weakened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Wen and J. Y. Tang, A solution considering elasticplastic deformation of asperities for contact between rough cylindrical surfaces, Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 70 (2) (2018) 353–362, https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/ILT–09–2017–0269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. W. Aditya and F. Sadeghi, Rolling contact fatigue of case carburized steels, International J. of Fatigue, 95 (2017) 264–281, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014 2112316303668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Haifeng, H. Liu, C. Zhu and Z. P. Wei, Sun study of rolling contact fatigue behavior of a wind turbine gear based on damage–coupled elastic–plastic model, International J. of Mechanical Sciences, 141 (2018) 512–519, https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740318301127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. F. Bower and K. L. Johnson, The influence of strain hardening on cumulative plastic deformation in rolling and sliding line contact, J. of the Mechanics & Physics of Solids, 37 (1989) 471–493, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022509689900252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Kapoor and K. L. Johnson, Effect of changes in contact geometry on shakedown of surfaces in rolling/sliding contact, International J. of Mechanical Sciences, 34 (1992) 223–239, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002074039 290073P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Kapoor, G. E. Morales–Espejel and A. V. Olver, A shakedown analysis of simple spur gears, Tribology Transactions, 45 (2002) 103–109, https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/10402000208982527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. S. P. Alan, H. F. Chen, M. Ciavarella and G. Specchia, Shakedown analyses for rolling and sliding contact problems, International J. of Solids & Structures, 43 (2006) 4201–4219, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768 305003070.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Conrado, S. Foletti, C. Gorla and I. V. Papadopoulos, Use of multiaxial fatigue criteria and shakedown theorems in thermo–elastic rolling–sliding contact problems, Wear, 270 (2011) 344–354, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043164810004187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. D. Allison, Evolution of mechanical properties of M50 bearing steel due to rolling contact fatigue, University of Florida, Florida, United State (2013) 148, https://search. proquest.com/openview/8b0dda537c17a658793f827f029230 34/1?pq–origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. N. Moulik, H. T. Y. Yang and S. Chandrasekar, Simulation of thermal stresses due to grinding, International J. of Mechanical Sciences, 43 (2001) 831–851, https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740300000278.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Batista,Dias, Lebrun, Flour Le and Inglebert, Contact fatigue of automotive gears: evolution and effects of residual stresses introduced by surface treatments, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 23 (2000) 217–228, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j. 1460–2695.2000.00268.x.

  12. Y. Q. Xu, T. Zhang and P. Xu, Analysis of the gear contact fatigue strength based on the compressive residual stress, Advanced Materials Research, 143–144 (2010) 1086–1090, https://www.scientific.net/AMR.143–144.1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Ahmadi and A. Nayebi, Predicting the ratcheting strain of 304 stainless steel by considering yield surface distortion and using a viscoplastic model, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (2015) 2857–2862, https://link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s12206–015–0614–z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. P. Evans, M. F. Al–Mayali and K. J. Sharif, Assessment of the effects of residual stresses on fatigue life of real rough surfaces in lubricated contact, International Conference for Students on Applied Engineering, IEEE, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (2016) 5, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7810173/.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. K. Fukumasu, G. A. A. Machado, R. M. Souza and I. F. Machado, Stress analysis to improve pitting resistance in gear teeth, Procedia CIRP, 45 (2016) 255–258, https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827116006442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Warhadpande, An elastic–plastic finite element model for rolling contact fatigue, Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, Indiana, United States (2012) 208, http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.asp x?articleid=1407904.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Shen, S. M. Moghadam, F. Sadeghi, K. Paulson and R. W. Trice, Effect of retained austenite–Compressive residual stresses on rolling contact fatigue life of carburized AISI 8620 steel, International J. of Fatigue, 75 (2015) 135–144, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112 315000547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Liu, C. Zhu, Z. Sun and C. Song, Starved lubrication of a spur gear pair, Tribology International, 94 (2016) 52–60, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301679 X15003217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Liu, K. Mao, C. Zhu and X. Xu, Mixed lubricated line contact analysis for spur gears using a deterministic model, J. of Tribology, 134 (2012) 021501, http://tribology.asme digitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1468923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K. L. Johnson, A graphical approach to shakedown in rolling contact, Springer Netherlands (1990) https://link. springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978–94–009–0779–9_26.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Liu, H. Liu, P. Bocher, C. Zhu and P. Wei, Effects of the case hardening properties on the contact fatigue of a wind turbine gear pair, International J. of Mechanical Sciences, 141 (2018) 520–527, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740317333921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. L. Mcdowell and G. J. Moyar, Effects of non–linear kinematic hardening on plastic deformation and residual stresses in rolling line contact, Wear, 144 (1991) 19–37, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444 887740500067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Reinhardt and R Adibi–Asl, Non–cyclic shakedownratcheting boundary determination: Analytical examples, Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, ASME, Washington, USA (2010) 555–563, http://proceedings. asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1 618525.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. E. Merwin and K. L. Johnson, An analysis of plastic deformation in rolling contact, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1847–1982 (1–196) 177 (1963) 676–690, http://J.s.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1243/PIME_ PROC_ 1963_177_052_02.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaiju Liu.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Chongdu Cho

Huaiju Liu received his Ph.D. from the University of Warwick, UK in 2013, now is an Associate Professor at State Key Lab of Mechanical Transmissions, Chongqing University, China. His research fields include tribology and fatigue of mechanical elements.

Haifeng He is a post-graduate student at State Key Lab of Mechanical Transmissions, Chongqing University, China. His research field is fatigue damage of mechanical elements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, H., Liu, H., Zhu, C. et al. Shakedown analysis of a wind turbine gear considering strain-hardening and the initial residual stress. J Mech Sci Technol 32, 5241–5250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1022-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1022-y

Keywords

Navigation