Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 1787–1792 | Cite as

Development of a mobile robot mimicking the frilled lizard

  • Dongwon YunEmail author


Here a prototype biomimetic robot is presented that imitates the shape and motion of a frilled lizard. The robot’s upper body posture can be controlled using the air resistance generated by the frill around the neck during running. Several experiments were conducted to determine the range of motion of the robot. A fan experiment showed that the robot could adjust the angle of the upper body at intervals of at least 5° to 10° up to 35°. The robot was able to control the angle of its upper body to an accuracy of about 1° while running. Thus, the robot controlled its upper body angle using the membrane around its neck. This is the first robot to use air to control the upper body posture.


Air drag Frilled lizards Mobile robot 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    H. Asama, M. Sato, L. Bogoni, H. Kaetsu, A. Mitsumoto and I. Endo, Development of an omni-directional mobile robot with 3 DOF decoupling drive mechanism, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan (1995) 1925–1930.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. S. Chong and L. Kleeman, Accurate odometry and error modeling for a mobile robot, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (1997) 2783–2788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Halme, T. Schönberg and Y. Wang, Motion control of a spherical mobile robot, Proc. of International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Mie University, Tsu-City, Mie-Pref., Japan (1996) 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. Lee and Y. Choi, Mechatronics, A new actuator system using dual-motors and a planetary gear, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatrocnis, 17 (1) (2012) 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Z. Bayraktaroglu, Snake-like locomotion: Experimentations with a biologically inspired wheel-less snake robot, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 44 (3) (2009) 591–602.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. A. Transeth, K. Y. Pettersen and P. Liljebäck, A survey on snake robot modeling and locomotion, Robotica, 27 (7) (2009) 999–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Li, W. Liu, X. Fu, G. Bonsignori, U. Scarfogliero, C. Stefanini and P. Dario, Mechatronics, jumping like an insect: Design and dynamic optimization of a jumping mini robot based on bio-mimetic inspiration, Mechatronics, 22 (2) (2012) 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Ishikawa, Y. Minami and T. Sugie, Development and control experiment of the trident snake robot, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 15 (1) (2010) 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. H. Boyle, S. Johnson and A. A. Dehghani-Sanij, Adaptive undulatory locomotion of a C. elegans inspired robot, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 18 (2) (2013) 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. J. Clemente, P. C. Withers, G. Thompson and D. Lloyd, Why go bipedal? Locomotion and morphology in Australianagamid lizards, Journal of Experimental Biology, 211 (13) (2008) 2058–2065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. J. Irschick and B. C. Jayne, Effects of incline on speed, acceleration, body posture and hindlimb kinematics in two species of lizard Callisaurus draconoides and Uma scoparia, Journal of Experimental Biology, 201 (2) (1998) 273–287.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. B. Huey, A. F. Bennett, H. John-Alder and K. A. Nagy, Locomotor capacity and foraging behaviour of Kalaharilacertid lizards, Animal Behaviour, 32 (1) (1984) 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. J. Irschick and B. C. Jayne, Comparative threedimensional kinematics of the hindlimb for high-speed bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion of lizards, Journal of Experimental Biology, 202 (9) (1999) 1047–1065.Google Scholar
  14. [14] (2016})Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Shine, Function and evolution of the frill of the frillneck lizard, Chlamydosaurus kingii (Sauria: Agamidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 40 (1) (1990) 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. T. Greenwood, Advanced dynamics, Cambridge University Press (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. F. Hoerner, Fluid-dynamic drag: Practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Midland Park, NJ (1965).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Rahimi-Gorji, O. Pourmehran, M. Gorji-Bandpy and T. B. Gorji, CFD simulation of airflow behavior and particle transport and deposition in different breathing conditions through the realistic model of human airways, Journal of Molecular Liquids, 209 (2015) 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Alapati, W. S. Che and Y. K. Suh, Effect of defect location on the swimming speed of a microscopic artificial swimmer: A numerical study, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (5) (2015) 1823–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Robotics EngineeringDaegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST)DaeguKorea

Personalised recommendations