Hydrogen damage in 34CrMo4 pressure vessel steel with high tensile strength
- 61 Downloads
Various efforts have been made to improve the safety of high-pressure gas cylinders for hydrogen or natural gas with high strength steel liners. Metal liners with high tensile strength have a safety concern, particularly with hydrogen gas or hydrogen generating environments. The hydrogen can permeate into the liner material, and make the material brittle, causing hydrogen damage. This study investigated resistance to hydrogen damage for two kinds of 34CrMo4 steel with different strength levels. Hydrogen was charged with the electrochemical method, and the material strength was measured by the small punch testing technique. Hydrogen concentration of the specimen was also measured for every testing condition, with various charging periods. The specimens with high tensile strength absorbed more hydrogen than the regular tensile strength specimens. The absorbed hydrogen caused internal damage of intergranular cracking and blistering. Material ductility at failure decreased, as the hydrogen concentration of the specimen increased. But the hydrogen concentration had virtually no effect on the strength of the materials with hydrogen. These results confirm that the susceptibility to hydrogen damage of the high tensile strength materials is much higher than that of the materials with regular strength. If the metal liner of a hoop-wrapped cylinder vessel of type II has high tensile strength, general corrosion at the liner surface can cause a hydrogen rich environment, and the cylinder can suffer hydrogen damage and embrittlement. Therefore, controlling the strength level under an optimal level is critical for the safety of a cylinder made with 34CrMo4 steel.
KeywordsCrMo steel Electrochemical hydrogen Embrittlement Hydrogen cracking Pressure vessel Small punch test
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- ANS ANSI/CSA NGV2-2000, Basic requirements for compressed Natural gas vehicle (NGV) fuel containers, CSA International, 8501E, Cleveland, OH (2000).Google Scholar
- B. Somerday, P. Sofronis and R. Jones, Effects of hydrogen on materials, Proceedings of the 2008 International Hydrogen Conference, ASM International (2009).Google Scholar
- N. Eliaz, A. Shachar, B. Tal and D. Eliezer, Characteristics of hydrogen embrittlement, stress corrosion cracking and tempered martensite embrittlement in high-strength steels, Eng. Fail. Anal., 9 (2) (2002) 167–184.Google Scholar
- Fractography Atlas of steel weldments, Japan Welding Society (1982).Google Scholar
- B. Swieczko-Zurek, S. Sobieszczyk, J. Cwiek and A. Zielinski, Evaluation of susceptibility of high-strength steels to hydrogen delayed cracking, J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng., 18 (1–2) (2006) 243–246.Google Scholar
- K. B. Yoon, Failure analysis of high pressure vessel of type II for CNG bus, 5th International Conference on Engineering Failure Analysis, July 1-4 (2012).Google Scholar
- K. Murakami, N. Yabe, H. Suzuki, K. Takai, Y. Hagihara and Y. Wada, Substitution of high-pressure charge by electrolysis charge and hydrogen environment embrittlement susceptibilities for Inconel 625 and SUS 316L, 2006 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93397 (2006) 1–8.Google Scholar
- H. U. Seo, Y. W. Ma and K. B. Yoon, Evaluation of hydrogen embrittlement behavior in Inconel alloy 617 by small punch test, Trans. Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, 21 (4) (2010) 340–345.Google Scholar
- J. D. Parker and J. D. James, Developments in a progressingtechnology, ASME PVP, 279 (1994) 167–172.Google Scholar
- ASTM Standard E8M-11, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2011) Doi: 10.1520/E0008-E0008M-11.Google Scholar
- NACE Standard TM0177-2005, Standard test method: Laboratory testing of metals for resistance to sulfide stress cracking and stress corrosion cracking in H2S environments, NACE Int., Houston, TX (2005).Google Scholar