Skip to main content
Log in

Topology and thickness optimization of an indenter under stress and stiffness constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indenter is one of the core components of a waste compression station. In this paper, a new layout free from the existing structure for indenter with lighter weight and good performance is presented. The design procedure includes two steps: Topology optimization and thickness optimization. In topology optimization process, a creative layout of indenter is obtained using Solid isotropic microstructures with penalization (SIMP) method. In thickness optimization process, based on topology optimization results, a design review was conducted, and a revised model was created which addresses all structural and manufacturability concerns. Shape and size optimization was then performed in the detailed design stage to further minimize the mass while meeting the stiffness and stress targets. Finally, an optimized model for the indenter is obtained. From the finite element analysis, it can be seen that there is a 31.8 % reduction in total mass while the performance increased compared with the original model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Shobeiri, Topology optimization using bi-direction at evolutionary structural optimization based on the elementfree Galerkin method, Optim Eng, 48 (2016) 380–396.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Z. Lin, Z. Luo and L. Y. Tong, A new multi-objective programming scheme for topology optimization of compliant mechanisms, Struct Multidiscip O, 40 (2010) 241–255.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. G. Cho, J. S. Koo and H. S. Jung, A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30 (2016) 673–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Y. Lim, J. S. Kim, J. Kim and H. B. Smith, Dynamic effects on the lightweight design of metallic core sandwich columns, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (2015) 1335–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. W. Zhang, X. S. Wang, Z. R. Wang and S. J. Yuan, Enhancing fatigue life of cylinder-crown integrated structure by optimizing dimension, Frontiers of Mechanical Eng., 10 (2015) 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Huang and Y. M. Xie, Optimal design of periodic structures using evolutionary topology optimization, Struct Multidiscip O, 36 (2008) 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. J. Kim, Y. J. Kang, B. H. Lee and H. J. Ahn, Sensitivity analysis for reducing critical responses at the axle shaft of a lightweight vehicle, Int. J. Automot. Techn. (2012) 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. S. Park and S. K. Youn, Topology optimization of shell structures using Adaptive inner-front (AIF) level set method, Struct Multidiscip O, 36 (2008) 43–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. G. W. Jang, M. S. Yoon and J. H. Park, Lightweight flatbed trailer design by using topology and thickness optimization, Struct Multidiscip O, 41 (2009) 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. H. Zhao, Y. X. Liu, L. Hua and H. J. Mao, Finite element analysis and topology optimization of a 12000 KN fine blanking press frame, Struct Multidiscip O, 54 (2016) 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi, Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 71 (1988) 197–224.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. B. He, W. Tang, S. Huang, S. C. Hou and H. X. Cai, Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 83 (2016) 1419–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Zhong, R. Y. Su, L. J. Gui and Z. J. Fan, Topology and sizing optimization of discrete structures using a cooperative co-evolutionary genetic algorithm with independent ground structures, Eng. Optimiz., 48 (2016) 911–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. S. Kim and J. Lee, Structural design of a level-luffing crane through trajectory optimization and strength-based size optimization, Struct Multidiscip O, 51 (2015) 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. S. Edwards, H. A. Kim and C. J. Budd, An evaluative study on ESO and SIMP for optimising a cantilever tie–beam, Struct Multidiscip O, 34 (2007) 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. U. E. Ozturk, Efficient method for fatigue based shape optimization of the oil sump carrying a differential case in four wheel drive vehicles, Struct Multidiscip O, 44 (2011) 823–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Liu, Y. Shi, Q. Zhou and R. Q. Xiu, A sequential sampling strategy to improve the global fidelity of metamodels in multi-level system design, Struct Multidiscip O, 53 (2016) 1295–1313.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Lilly and S. prakash, Experimental investigation and multiresponse genetic optimization of drilling parameters for self-healing GFRP, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (2017) 3777–3785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Herskovits, A. Leontiev, G. Dias and G. Santos, Contact shape optimization: A bilevel programming approach, Struct Multidiscip O, 20 (2000) 214–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Lan, J. W. Hu, C. P. Song, L. Hua and Y. M. Zhao, Modeling and optimization of a 10000 KN fine blanking press frame, RSETE (2012) 8353–8357.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. L. Shu, Mechanical property of engineering material, China Machine Press, Beijing (Chinese) (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. P. Bendsøe, Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem, Struct Multidiscip O, 1 (1989) 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Stolpe and K. Svanberg, An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization, Struct Multidiscip O, 22 (2001) 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. M. Xie and G. P. Steven, A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization, Comput. Struct., 49 (1993) 885–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. W. Jang, M. S. Yoon and J. H. Park, Lightweight flatbed trailer design by using topology and thickness optimization, Struct Multidiscip O, 41 (2009) 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShiZhe Feng.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Gang-Won Jang

Ang Li obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees from CUMTB. Now he is reading his Ph.D. in School of Mechatronic Engineering from China University of Mining and Technology. His research interests include lightweight structural design based topology optimization and fatigue prediction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, A., Liu, C. & Feng, S. Topology and thickness optimization of an indenter under stress and stiffness constraints. J Mech Sci Technol 32, 211–222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1222-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1222-x

Keywords

Navigation