Development of a transportability evaluation system using swept path analysis and multi-body dynamic simulation
In this study, we develop a transportability evaluation system for the transportation process or design process in product development engineering. The system extracts the constraint condition and transportability using swept path analysis and multi-body dynamic simulation. This system consists of two main software modules: a feature curve extraction module and a multi-body dynamic simulation module. The feature curve extraction module extracts the feature curve list of the entire transportation path with swept path analysis to transmit the information to the simulation module. The multi-body dynamic simulation module extracts the constraint condition for the product design process that a designer uses as the transportation constraint in the design process or quick checks the transportability of the product files. The entire structure of the system is accessible by a web-based platform. When the user (designer) inputs the product files and the transportation information, the system gives the constraints and transportability to the user. The entire analysis is performed by a background process on the analysis server. We also propose a multimodal transportability evaluation algorithm that considers design and dynamic conditions.
KeywordsEvaluation system Multi-body dynamic simulation Swept path analysis Transportability Transportation simulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- D. Kading, Multibody dynamic simulation of military vehicles for stability, safety, mobility, and load prediction, In Defense and Security Symposium, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 62280 (2006).Google Scholar
- R. Berman, R. Benade and B. Rosman, Autonomous prediction of performance-based standards for heavy vehicles, Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa and Robotics and Mechatronics International Conference (PRASARobMech) (2015) 184–188Google Scholar
- T. Dessin, F. Kienhöfer and P. Nordengen, Determining the optimal performance based standards heavy vehicle design, Proceedings of the International Symposium of Heavy Vehicle (2012).Google Scholar
- N. Bouton, R. Lenain, B. Thuilot and J. C. Fauroux, A rollover indicator based on the prediction of the load transfer in presence of sliding: Application to an all terrain vehicle, Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International Conference on (2007) 1158–1163Google Scholar
- R. J. Taylor, P. Yih and J. C. Gerdes, Safety performance and robustness of heavy vehicle AVCS, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH) (2005).Google Scholar
- L. Li and Q. Li, Vibration analysis based on full multi-body model for the commercial vehicle suspension system, Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) (2007) 203–207Google Scholar
- K. Akagi, K. Murayama, M. Yoshida and J. Kawahata, Modularization technology in power plant construction, 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2002) 641–647Google Scholar
- S. Park, K. Kim, N. Park and M. Chae, Simulation analysis of transporting fixation equipment on unit module, The Korean Institute of Building Construction, 13 (2) (2013) 143–144.Google Scholar
- K. Kim, C. Kim, D. Lee and Y. Lee, Development of a Korean modular housing construction scenario, The Korean Institute of Building Construction, 11 (1) (2011) 81–83.Google Scholar
- K. Moon, J. Mok, S. Chang, Y. Kim and S. Lee, Turning characteristics of articulated vehicles related to geometric design, Korean Society for Railway (2007) 39–45Google Scholar
- E. Rohmer, S. P. Singh and M. Freese, V-REP: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (2013) 1321–1326Google Scholar