Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of wheel/rail gap and rotating mechanism on dynamic performance of APM

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamics equations of Automatic passenger mover (APM) vehicle with the middle-guiding single-axle tire running gears were derived using linearized tire model, in which side force and rolling contact effect on running tire are taken account. A simulation model of APM vehicle based on Simulink environment was built using object-oriented programming technique, and the effects of contact statues between guiding tires and rail and different rotation modes on of curving performance and ride quality were studied. The simulation has shown that the preload force on guiding tires don’t improve curving performance but significantly worsen lateral ride quality, whereas the gap between guiding tires and rail will increase the running tires side force and guiding tires radial force on curve. The gap between guide tires and rail should be controlled between 0 and 5 mm on compromising the curving performance and ride quality of APM vehicle. The cornering force of the rotating mechanism above the springs mode is greater than that of the below mode, and decreases with the increase of the curve radius, which is unfavorable to the curve passing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. U. Yongsheng, Dynamics of modern rail vehicle, Beijing: Chinese railway press (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Hitoshi, Dynamics of automated guideway transit vehicle with single-axle bogies, Vehicle System Dynamics, 39 (5) (2003) 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y.-S. Kim et al., Dynamic model for ride comfort evaluations of rubber-tired light rail vehicle, Vehicle System Dynamics, 46 (11) (2008) 1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X. Wei, Test report on ride quality of Guangzhou APM vehicle, Shanghai: Tongji University (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Goda et al., A curving simulation for a monorail car, Railroad Conference, Proceedings of the 2000 ASME/IEEE Joint, IEEE (2000) 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. H. Lee et al., Dynamic response analysis of monorail bridges under moving trains and riding comfort of trains, Engineering Structures, 27 (14) (2005) 1999–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. H. Lee et al., Dynamic response of a monorail steel bridge under a moving train, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 294 (3) (2006) 562–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Naeimi, M. Tatari and A. Esmaeilzadeh, Dynamics of the monorail train subjected to the braking on a straight guideway bridge, Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 62 (3) (2015) 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Naeimi et al., Dynamic interaction of the monorail–bridge system using a combined finite element multibodybased model, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 229 (2) (2015) 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. Liu and P. Liu, Feasibility analysis on application of modified concrete contains rubber powder of straddle type monorail train waste tire, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 31 (2016) 804–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Lihui et al., Hunting stability of straddle-type monorail car based on equation eigenvalue, Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 31 (4) (2003) 471.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Lihui, Z. Jinsong and S. Gang, Dynamics model and simulation study of a straddle type monorail car, China Railway Science, 25 (5) (2004) 26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Shen and I. Pratt, The development of a railway dynamics modelling and simulation package to cater for current industrial trends, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 215 (3) (2001) 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lihui Ren.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Sungsoo Na

Yuanjin Ji received the Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Jiangsu and Master Degree in Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, respectively. His research interests are in the area of wheel/rail relationship and wear.

Lihui Ren received the Bachelor Degree and the Master Degree in Vehicle Engineering from Shanghai Railway University in 1995, Doctor in Vehicle Engineering from Tongji University in 2006. He is an Associate Professor at Institute of Rail Transit of Tongji University. His research interests are vehicle system dynamics and vehicle experimental test.

Huijie Wang received the Bachelor Degree in Vehicle Engineering from Tongji University in 2016. She is a postgraduate at Institute of Rail Transit of Tongji University majoring in Vehicle Engineering. Her research interest is vehicle system dynamics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, Y., Ren, L. & Wang, H. The influence of wheel/rail gap and rotating mechanism on dynamic performance of APM. J Mech Sci Technol 31, 5245–5256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1017-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1017-0

Keywords

Navigation