Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 2005–2014 | Cite as

Sensitivity analysis and chemical reaction mechanism simplification of blast furnace gas in gas turbine combustor environment

  • Zhao Yang
  • Xiangsheng Li
  • Zhenping Feng
  • Lian Lu
Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

To solve the lack of reduced Blast furnace gas (BFG) mechanism under elevated pressure environment in numerical simulation, the present paper analyzes the sensitivity of every elementary reaction to combustion rate by using one dimensional laminar premixed reactor model. The steps with sensitivities larger than 0.1 are selected and the chemical kinetic parameters are revised by the method of weighted least squares fitting. The reduced 18-step mechanism which is specified to 0.1-3 Mpa is validated for laminar flame speeds, ignition delay times with available experiment data and GRI3.0 mechanism. Moreover, both the reduced and DRM-22 mechanisms are introduced into an experimental burner and an industrial gas turbine combustor simulation. The results of temperature and main species distribution illustrate that the 18-step mechanism is able to give a reasonable prediction combustion simulation. The 18-step mechanism lays the foundation of further studying the combustion of the low calorific value fuels at high pressure conditions.

Keywords

Blast furnace gas Combustion simulation Mechanism reduction Reaction mechanism Sensitivity analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P. S. Gregory and D. M. Frenklach, Chemical Mechanism for Natural Gas Combustion.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. V. Subith and K. R. Hanson, Shock tube study of syngas ignition in rich CO2 mixtures and determination of the rate of H+O2+CO2?HO2+CO2, Energy and Fuels, 157 (2010) 990–997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. B. Wang, Reduced kinetic mechanisms and their numerical treatment I: Wet CO flames, Combustion and Flame, 94 (3) (1993) 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    E. Petersen, M. D. Barrett and B. Alexander, New syngas/air ignition data at lower temperature and elevated pressure and comparison to current kinetics models, Combustion and Flame, 149 (1-2) (2007) 244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. P. D. Burke, L. Frederick and J. Yiguang, Assessment of kinetic modeling for lean H2/CH4/O2/diluent flames at high pressures, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33 (1) (2011) 905–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. F. Frassoldati and T. E. Ranzi, The ignition, combustion and flame structure of carbon monoxide/hydrogen mixtures. Note 1: Detailed kinetic modeling of syngas combustion also in presence of nitrogen compounds, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (15) (2007) 3471–3485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Priyank, Testing a small detailed chemical kinetic mechanism for the combustion of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, Combustion and Flame, 145 (1) (2006) 316–323.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. Hui, Analysis of sensitivity to BFG combustion, Journal of Northeastern University:Nature Science Edition, 31 (12) (2010) 1745–1748.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. G. Davis and H. Wand, An optimized kinetic model of H2/CO combustion, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 30 (1) (2005) 1283–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Lu and C. K. Law, A criterion based on computational singular perturbation for the identification of quasi steadystate species: a reduced mechanism for methane oxidation with no chemistry, Combustion & Flame, 154 (4) (2008) 761–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Turányi, Applications of sensitivity analysis to combustion chemistry, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 57 (1) (1997) 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Warnatz, Combustion Chemistry, Gardiner, W. C. (Ed.), John Wiley, New York, 232 (1984).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Jinli and C. Guobiao, Reduced mechanism for oxygen/methane combustion based on sensitivity analysis, Journal of Aerospace Power, 27 (7) (2012) 114–119.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. K. Miller, CHEMKIN-II: A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics, Sandia Report (1989).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. M. Morett, A reduced chemical kinetic mechanism for computational fluid dynamics simulations of high brake mean effective pressure, lean-burn natural gas engines, Colorado State University (2012).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. P. Smith, Chemical mechanism for natural gas combustion.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    L. Juan and A. Kazakov, A comprehensive kinetic mechanism for CO, CH2O, and CH3OH combustion, Interntional Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 39 (3) (2007) 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. L. Baulch and R. A. Cox, Evaluated kinetic data for combustion modeling, J. Phys. Chem, Ref. Data, 21 (1994).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. J. Kee and F. M. Meeks, Chemkin-III: A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical and plasma kinetics, Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, Sand 96 (1996).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. Pugh, Combustion characterization of compositionally dynamic steelworks gases, Thesis, Cardiff University, UK (2013).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Z. M. Nikolaou, J. Y. Chen and N. Swaminathan, A 5-step reduced mechanism for combustion of CO/H2/H2O/CH4/CO2 mixtures with low hydrogen/methane and high H2O content, Combustion and Flame, 160 (1) (2013) 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    L. D. Thi, Y. Zhang, J. Fu and Z. Huang, Study on ignition delay of multi-component syngas using shock tube, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 92 (5) (2014) 861–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Hossain and W. Malalasekera, A combustion model sensitivity study for CH4/H2 bluff-body stabilized flame, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 221 (11) (2007) 1377–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. Kazakov and M. Frenklach, Reduced reaction sets based on GRI-Mech 1.2, University of California at Berkeley, USA (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhao Yang
    • 1
  • Xiangsheng Li
    • 1
  • Zhenping Feng
    • 1
  • Lian Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of TurbomachineryXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations