Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1909–1919 | Cite as

Efficient walking gait with different speed and step length: Gait strategies discovered by dynamic optimization of a biped model

Article
  • 162 Downloads

Abstract

The selection of walking gait for biped robots depends on the requirement of walking environment. Walking with different situations of walking speeds and step lengths, the gait strategies are different. In this paper, we study the energetically optimal walking gait strategies under the different walking situations using a simple biped walking model with dynamic optimization method. The walking model with mass legs and three actuations, which is designed upon Srinivasan’s model, is built for the purpose of the paper. Dynamic optimization is used for a free search with minimal constraints. The analysis of the COT of the optimal gaits and its two components COTswing and COTpush-off show that the COT is increasing with the increase of the walking speed. For a certain walking speed, the minimal value of COT can be found with a corresponding step length. According to the joint torques output strategies, we discover four gait patterns including two typical walking gaits patterns that the hip torque impulse is only at the beginning or at the end of the swing phase, respectively, and two other new transitional gait patterns.

Keywords

Efficient gait Walking robots Biped locomotion Motion planning Dynamic optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC) Finals 2015, http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/, June (2015).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Kuindersma et al., Optimization-based locomotion planning, estimation, and control design for the Atlas humanoid robot, Autonomous Robots, July (2015).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    DRC-HUBO, http://www.drc-hubo.com/, June (2015).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Collins, A. Ruina, R. Tedrake and M. Wisse, Efficient bipedal robots based on passive dynamic walkers, Science Magazine, 307 (2005) 1082–1085.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. McGeer, Passive dynamic walking, Int. J. Robot. Res., 9 (1990) 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Goswami, B. Thuilot and B. Espiau, A study of the passive gait of a compass-like biped robot: Symmetry and chaos, Int. J. Rob. Res., 17 (12) (1998) 1282–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Garcia, A. Chatterjee and A. Ruina, Simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 120 (2) (1998) 281–288.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. A. Bhounsule et al., Low-bandwidth reflex-based control for lower power walking: 65 km on a single battery charge, Int. J. Rob. Res., 33 (10) (2014) 1305–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    K. Sreenath et al., Embedding active force control within the compliant hybrid zero dynamics to achieve stable, fast running on MABEL, Int. J. Rob. Res., 33 (2014) 988–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Ramezani, J. W. Hurst and K. A. Hamed, Performance analysis and feedback control of ATRIAS, a threedimensional bipedal robot, Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 136 (2) (2013) 021012.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Ruina, What’s next at the robotics and biomechanics lab, http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/robots/index.php (2012).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Park, A. Ramezani and J. W. Grizzle, A finite-state machine for accommodating unexpected large ground-height variations in bipedal robot walking, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 29 (2) (2013) 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Srinivasan, Why walk and run: energetic costs and energetic optimality in simple mechanics-based models of a bipedal animal, Cornell Dissertation (2006).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. M. Alexander, Principles of animal locomotion, Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. M. Alexander, Mechanics of bipedal locomotion, Pergamon Press, New York, 1 (1976) 493–504.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. M. Alexander, Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates, Physiol. Rev., 69 (1989) 1199–1227.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Margaria, Biomechanics and Energetics of Muscular Exercise, Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press (1976).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. F. Hoyt and C. R. Taylor, Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses, Nature, 292 (1981) 239–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. E. Minetti and R. M. Alexander, A theory of metabolic costs for bipedal gaits, J. Theor. Biol., 186 (1997) 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Srinivasan and A. Ruina, Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running, Nature, 439 (2006) 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Srinivasan and A. Ruina, Idealized walking and running gaits minimize work, Proc. of the Royal Society A, 463 (2007) 2429–2446.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Srinivasan, Fifteen observations on the structure of energy-minimizing gaits in many simple biped models, J. R. Soc. Interface, 8 (2011) 74–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A. D. Kuo, Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 124 (2002) 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. D. Kuo, A simple model of bipedal walking predicts the preferred speed–step length relationship, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123 (2001) 264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    S. J. Hasaneini et al., The dynamic optimization approach to locomotion dynamics: Human-like gaits from a minimally constrained biped model, Advanced Robotics, May (2013).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    A. Ruina, J. E. A. Bertram and M. Srinivasan, A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping, pseudoelastic leg behavior in running and the walk-to-run transition, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 237 (2005) 170–192.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    P. G. Adamczyk and A. D. Kuo, Redirection of center-ofmass velocity during the step-to-step transition of human walking, Journal of Experimental Biology, 212 (2009) 2668–2678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    A. L. Schwab and M. Wisse, Basin of attraction of the simplest walking model, Proc. of DETC’01, ASME 2001, Pittsburgh, PA, United States (2001) 531–539.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. Yamakita and F. Asano, Extended passive velocity field control with variable velocity fields for a kneed biped, Advanced Robotics, 15 (2) (2001) 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    P. E. Gill, W. Murray and M. A. Saunders, SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization, SIAM Journal Optimization, 12 (2002) 979–1006, SIAM Review, 47 (1) (2005) 99–131.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Naval Biodynamics Laboratory, Anthropometry and Mass Distribution for Human Analogues, Military Male Aviators, March, 1 (1988).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Winter, Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons (2005).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kang An
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chuanjiang Li
    • 1
  • Zuhua Fang
    • 1
  • Chengju Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.The College of Information, Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringShanghai Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Robotics and Intelligent System LaboratoryTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations