Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1869–1876 | Cite as

Design of a piston forging process using a hybrid Taguchi method and multiple criteria decision-making

Article
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

In the process of hot forging aluminum pistons, many factors must be considered. In this study, the goal to which was to design the process parameters of the piston in forging, material temperatures, friction coefficients, draft angle, and preform type were major control factors. To determine the optimization of multiple performances, considering forming load and die stress as affected by the control factors in the piston forging process, a hybrid of Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) and the Taguchi method was employed. For the application of this hybrid method, a Multiple-objective performance index (MOPI) was used to solve the aluminum piston forging process with multiple performance characteristics. A finite element simulation analysis was conducted to investigate multiple performances. Through the application of the Taguchi method based on MOPI that can be referred to as the Signal to noise (SN) ratio, the relatively important influences of major factors are examined and the design parameters for the piston forging process are optimized. The results are presented in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.

Keywords

Aluminum forging piston Finite element (FE) analysis Multiple criteria decision-making Taguchi method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. Y. Kim, C. W. Park, H. I. Kim, K. S. Park, Y. H. Kim and H. S. Joe, A Study of the FEM forming analysis of the Al powder forging piston, Trans. KSME A, 34 (2010) 1543–1548.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. I. Choi, J. H. Park, J. H. Kim, S. K. Kim, Y. H. Kim and J. H. Lee, A study on manufacturing of aluminum automotive piston by thixoforging, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 32 (2007) 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. H. Wu and M. S. Chang, Use of Taguchi method to develop a robust design for the magnesium alloy die casting process, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 379 (2004) 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. C. Chen and J. Y. Huang, Design of brass alloy drawing process using Taguchi method, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 464 (2007) 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. Xia, H. Y. Hsu and L. X. Kong, A CFD-aided experimental study on bending of micro glass pipettes, J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 21 (2007) 1483–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    N. M. Mehat and S. Kamaruddin, Investigating the effects of injection molding parameters on the mechanical properties of recycled plastic parts using the Taguchi method, Mater. Manuf. Proc., 26 (2011) 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. L. Lin, K. S. Wang, H. H. Yan and Y. S. Tarng, Optimization of the electrical discharge machining process based on the Taguchi method with fuzzy logics, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 102 (2000) 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Y. Kuo, T. Yang and G.-W. Huang, The use of a grey-based Taguchi method for optimizing multi-response simulation problems, Eng. Opt., 40 (2008) 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L.-I. Tong and C.-T. Su, Optimizing multi-response problems in the Taguchi method by fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int., 13 (1997) 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. L. Saaty, The analytical hierarchy process, McGraw Hill Company, New York (1980).MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D.-Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95 (1996) 649–655.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications, Springer-Verlag, New York (1981).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H.-S Shih, H.-J Shyur and E. S. Lee, An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making, Math. Com. Model, 45 (2007) 801–813.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringUlsan CollegeUlsanKorea
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityPusanKorea

Personalised recommendations