Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1825–1833 | Cite as

Buckling of single-walled carbon nanotubes with and without defects

Article

Abstract

This paper studies the buckling behavior of simply-simply supported Single-walled Carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) with and without defects. The buckling of carbon nanotubes without defects was investigated using the Finite element method (FEM) and analytical treatment and that of carbon nanotubes with defects was studied only by FEM. The carbon nanotubes were modeled as beams and shells. Computations showed that beam elements in the given form provided varying results as shells in their numerical or analytical manner for a small aspect ratio. The defects resulted from the removal of randomly determined carbon atoms and beam elements connected to the nodes. The increasing number of defects decreased the critical buckling force of SWCNTs. The decrease in the critical buckling force was almost the same for SWCNTs with the same diameter but with different chirality.

Keywords

Buckling Beam element Carbon nanotube Shell element 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Iijima, Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature, 354 (1991) 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Li and T. W. Chou, A structural mechanics approach for the analysis of carbon nanotubes, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 40 (10) (2003) 2487–2499.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Li and T. W. Chou, Elastic moduli of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and the effect of van der Waals forces, Computational Science and Technology, 63 (11) (2003) 1517–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Cao, Atomistic studies of mechanical properties of graphene, Polymers, 6 (9) (2014) 2404–2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. A. Hartmann, M. Todt, F. G. Rammerstorfer, F. D. Fisher and O. Paris, Elastic properties of graphene obtained by computational mechanical tests, Europhysics Letters, 103 (6) (2013) 68004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. I. Tserpes and P. Papanikos, Finite element modeling of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Composites: Part B, 36 (5) (2005) 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. W Fan, Y. Y. Liu and Ch. Hwu, Finite element simulation for estimating the mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Applied Physics A, 95 (3) (2009) 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. I. Giannopoulos, P. A. Kakavas and N. K. Anifantis, Evaluation of the effective mechanical properties of single walled carbon nanotubes using a spring based finite element approach, Computational Material Science, 41 (4) (2008) 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Rossi and M. Meo, On the estimation of mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes by using a molecular-mechanics based FE approach, Composites Science and Technology, 69 (9) (2009) 1394–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Brcic, M. Canadija and J. Brnic, Influence of waviness and vacancy defects on carbon nanotubes properties, Procedia Engineering, 100 (2015) 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    N. A. Sakharova, A. F. G. Pereira, J. M. Antunes and J. V. Fernandes, Numerical simulation study of the elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes containing vacancy defects, Composites Part B: Engineering, 89 (2016) 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Q. Zhang, G. R. Liu and X. Han, Effect of small length scale on elastic buckling of multi-walled carbon nanotubes under radial pressure, Physics Letters A, 349 (5) (2006) 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. C. Eringen, Nonlocal Continuum Field Theories, Springer, New York, USA (2002).MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Karlicic, T. Murmu, S. Adhikari and M. McCarthy, Non-local Structural Mechanics, Willey, New Jersey, USA (2016).MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. M. Wang, Y. Q. Ma, Y. Y. Zhang and K. K. Ang, Buckling of double-walled carbon nanotubes modelled by solid shell elements, Journal of Applied Physics, 99 (11) (2006) 114317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    N. Hu, K. Nunoya, D. Pan, T. Okabe and H. Fukunaga, Prediction of buckling characteristics of carbon nanotubes, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44 (20) (2007) 6535–6555.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    X. Yao, Q. Han and H. Xin, Bending buckling behaviours of single-and multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Computational Materials Science, 43 (4) (2008) 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. G. Arani, R. Rahmani and A. Arefmanesh, Elastic buckling analysis of single-walled carbon nanotube under combined loading by using the ANSYS software, Physica E, 40 (7) (2008) 2390–2395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Rahmandoust and A. Öchsner, Buckling behaviour and natural frequency of zigzag and armchair single-walled carbon nanotubes, Journal of Nano Research, 16 (2011) 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    S. I. Yengejeh, S. A. Kazemi and A. Öchsner, Influence of combined loading on the structural stability of carbon nanotubes, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 158 (2015) 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Z. Kang, M. Li and Q. Tang, Buckling behavior of carbon nanotube-based intramolecular junctions under compression: Molecular dynamics simulation and finite element analysis, Computational Materials Science, 50 (1) (2010) 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    S. I. Yengejeh, M. A. Zadeh and A. Öchsner, On the buckling behavior of connected carbon nanotubes with parallel longitudinal axes, Applied Physics A, 115 (4) (2014) 1335–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    B. Safaei, P. Naseradinmousavi and A. Rahmani, Development of an accurate molecular mechanics model for buckling behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes under axial compression, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 65 (2016) 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. A. Jandaghian and O. Rahmani, On the buckling behavior of piezoelectric nanobeams: An exact solution, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (8) (2015) 3175–3182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    R. Kolahchi, M. R. Bidgoli, G. Beygipoor and M. H. Fakhar, A nonlocal nonlinear analysis for buckling in embedded FG-SWCNT-reinforced microplates subjected to magnetic field, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (9) (2015) 3669–3677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. Kiani, Axial buckling scrutiny of doubly orthogonal slender nanotubes via nonlocal continuum theory, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (10) (2015) 4267–4272.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    H. Xin, Q. Han and X. Yao, Buckling and axially compressive properties of perfect and defective single-walled carbon nanotubes, Carbon, 45 (13) (2007) 2486–2495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    H. Xin, Q. Han and X. Yao, Buckling of defective singlewalled and double-walled carbon nanotubes under axial compression by molecular dynamics simulation, Composites Science and Technology, 68 (7-8) (2008) 1809–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    V. Parvaneh, M. Shariati and A. M. M. Sabeti, Investigation of vacancy defects effects on the buckling behavior of SWCNTs via a structural mechanics approach, European Journal of Mechanics -A/Solids, 28 (6) (2009) 1072–1078.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Ghavamian and A. Öchsner, Numerical investigation on the influence of defects on the buckling behavior of singleand multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Physica E, 46 (2012) 241–249.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    R. H. Poelma, H. Sadeghian and G. Q. Zhang, Effects of single vacancy defect position on the stability of carbon nanotubes, Microelectronics Reliability, 52 (7) (2012) 1279–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    H. Torabi, M. Shariati, E. Sedaghat and A. L. Zadeh, Buckling behaviour of perfect and defective DWCNTs under axial, bending and torsional loadings via structural mechanics approach, Meccanica, 48 (8) (2013) 1959–1974.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    M. Eftekhari, S. Mohammadi and A. R. Khoei, Effect of defects on the local shell buckling and post-buckling behavior of single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Computational Material Science, 79 (2013) 736–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    K. I. Tserpes and I. Vatistas, Buckling analysis of pristine and defected graphene, Mechanics Research Communications, 64 (2015) 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    M. Fadaee, Buckling analysis of a defective annular graphene sheet in elastic medium, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40 (3) (2016) 1863–1872.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    I. Elishakoff, Carbon Nanotubes and Nanosensors: Vibration, Buckling and Ballistic Impact, Wiley, New York, USA (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    R. Rafiee and R. M. Moghadam, On the modeling of carbon nanotubes: A critical review, Composites Part B: Engineering, 54 (2014) 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    W. Flügge, Stresses in Shells, Springer, New York, USA (1973).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    R. Ansari, S. Sahmani and H. Rouhi, Rayleigh-Ritz axial buckling analysis of single-walled carbon nanotubes with different boundary conditions, Physics Letters A, 375 (9) (2011) 1255–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    F. I. Niordson, Shell Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of KošiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations