Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the hydrodynamic torque effects on large size butterfly valves and comparing results with AWWA C504 standard recommendations

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Butterfly valves are widely used in various industries such as water distribution, sewage, oil and gas plants. The hydrodynamic torque applied on the butterfly valve disk is one of the most important factors which should be considered in their design and application. Although several methods have been used to calculate the total torque on these valves, most of them are based on hydrostatic analysis and ignore the hydrodynamic effect which has a major role to determine the torque of the large-size valves. For finding the dynamic-valvetorque, some empirical formulas and methods have been proposed; for example in AWWA C504 standard, a relationship for calculating the dynamic torque has been given and its variation versus disk angle has been stated. However, the use of these empirical relationships is restricted due to the conditions defined in the standards. In this paper, the dynamic-valve-torque has been calculated for a large butterfly valve under different conditions and also at the different opening angles of the valve disk. For this purpose a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method has been used. The results have been compared with those given in the AWWA C504 standard recommendations. Moreover, the effects of the disk shape and its deformation, surface roughness, upstream/downstream pressure variation and disk-offset value have been studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Kimura, T. Tanaka, K. Fujimoto and K. Ogawa, Hydraulic characteristics of butterfly valve-prediction of pressure loss characteristics, Elsevier Science B.V., ISA Transactions, 34(4) (1995) 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Grieco and L. Marmo, Predicting the pressure drop across the solids flow rate control device of a circulating fluidized bed, Powder Technology, Elsevier B. V., 161(2) (2006) 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Igarashi and T., S. Inagaki, Hydraulic losses of flow control devices in pipes, JSME, Series B, 38(3) (1995) 398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X. G. Song, L. Wang and Y. C. Park, Fluid and structural analysis of a large diameter butterfly valve, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 8(1) (2009) 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Huang and R. H. KIM, Three-dimensional analysis of partly open butterfly valve flows, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Trans. ASME, 118 (1996) 562–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Eom, Performance of butterfly valves as a flow controller, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Trans. ASME, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 110 (1988) 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Hassis, Noise caused by cavitating butterfly and monovar, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 225(3) (1999) 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. J. Morris and J. C. Dutton, An experimental investigation of butterfly valve performance downstream of an elbow, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 113(1) (1991) 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Morris and J. C. Dutton, The performance of two butterfly valves mounted in series, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 113(3) (1991) 419–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. S. Yang, W. W. Hwang, M. H. Ko and S. J. Lee, Cavitation detection of butterfly valve using support vector, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 287(1) (2005) 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Sarpkaya, Torque and cavitation characteristics of butterfly valves. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans. ASME (1961) 511–518.

  12. T. Kimura and K. Ogawa, Hydrodynamic characteristics of a butterfly valve-prediction of torque, Elsevier Science B.V., 34(4) (1995) 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Leutwyler and C. Dalton, Computational study of torque and forces due to compressible flow on a butterfly valve disk in mid-stroke position, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 128(5) (2006) 1074–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Danbon and C. Solliec, Aerodynamic torque of a butterfly valve—influence of an elbow on the time-mean and instantaneous aerodynamic torque, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 122 920 (2000) 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Solliec and F. Danbon, Aerodynamic torque acting on a butterfly valve, Comparison and choice of a torque coefficient, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Trans. ASME, 121 (1999) 914–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Y. Park and M. K. Chung, Study on hydrodynamic torque of a butterfly valve, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 128(1) (2006) 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. S. Kalsi, B. Eldiwany, V. Sharma and A. Richie, Effect of butterfly valve shape variations on torque requirements for power plant, Eighth NRC/ASME Symposium on Valve and Pump Testing, Washington, D.C. (2004).

  18. P. M. J. Merati, M. J. Macelt and R. B. Erickson, Flow investigation around a V-sector ball valve, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 123 (2001) 662–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Rammohan, S. Saseendran and S. Kumaraswamy, CFD based prediction in butterfly, The 6th International Conference on Cavitations, The Netherlands (2006).

  20. P. S. Guillermo, A. V. Jaime and H. F. Steven, Three-dimensional control valve with complex geometry: CFD modeling and experimental validation, 34th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Portland, Oregon (2004).

  21. X. G. Song and Y. C. Park, Numerical analysis of butterfly valve-prediction of flow coefficient and hydrodynamic torque coefficient, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2007, 24–26 October, San Francisco, USA.

  22. B. Mohammadi and O. Pironneau, Analysis of the Kepsilon turbulence model (Research in Applied Mathematics), Wiley (Import), Masson, Paris, August (1994).

  23. AWWA Standard for rubber-seated butterfly valves, American Water Work Association, ANSI/AWWA C504-00, Revision of ANSI/AWWA C504-94, American Water Works Association (2000).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Zehsaz.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Sung Hoon Ahn

Farid Vakili-Tahami is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Tabriz, Iran. He received B.Sc.and M.Sc. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Tabriz, and Ph.D from the University of Manchester, UMIST in U.K. in 1988, 1991 and 2002, respectively. His current research interests include CDM analysis of mechanical engineering parts, creep damage of weldments, design of machine elements, numerical analysis of engineering components and FE based software coding for structural analysis.

Mohammad Zehsaz is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Tabriz University in Iran. He received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the Amirkabir University of Tehran, Iran, and the Ph.D from Liverpool University in U.K. 1978, 1983 and 1997, respectively. His current research interests are in vibration and fatigue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vakili-Tahami, F., Zehsaz, M., Mohammadpour, M. et al. Analysis of the hydrodynamic torque effects on large size butterfly valves and comparing results with AWWA C504 standard recommendations. J Mech Sci Technol 26, 2799–2806 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0733-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0733-8

Keywords

Navigation