Skip to main content
Log in

A new method to evaluate the influence coefficient matrix for gas path analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To create an online diagnostic system for a gas turbine, a well-formulated-influence coefficient matrix (ICM), a key component in a widely used existing theory, is essential. However, according to a recent research of the present authors, parameter deviations estimated by the traditional ICM contain unavoidable errors. These errors, called matching deviations, have been verified to be a consequence of the shifting operating point caused by component deterioration. Here we present a simple and accurate method which is still based on the widely accepted existing theory that accounts for component deterioration. Matching coefficients are introduced in this method to isolate and eliminate matching deviations. The ICM yielded by this method can improve the accuracy of both measurement prediction and parameter deviation estimations. By modeling a commercial power generation engine, a demonstration of the new method is presented and its limitation is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. A. Urban, Parameter selection for multiple fault diagnostics of gas turbine engines, AGARD Conference Proceedings, Liege, Belgium (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. Urban, Gas path analysis of commercial aircraft engines. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Aircraft Integrated Data Systems, Cologne, West Germany (1982).

  3. D. L. Doel, TEMPER - a gas-path analysis tool for commercial jet engines, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 116(1) (1994) 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Stamatis, K. Mathioudakis and M. Smith M, Gas turbine component fault identification by means of adaptive performance modeling, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, Brussels, Belgium (1990)90-GT-376.

  5. M. Zedda and R. Singh, Gas-turbine engine and sensor diagnostics, XIV International symposium on air-breathing engines, Florence, Italy. (1999) 255–261.

  6. M. Zedda and R. Singh, Gas turbine engine and sensor fault diagnosis using optimization techniques, Journal of Propulsion and Power 18(5) (2002) 1019–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Denny, F-16 Jet Engine Trending and Diagnostics with Neural Networks, Applications of Neural Networks 4 (1965) 419–422.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Fuster, A. Ligeza and M. J. Aguilar, Abductive diagnostic procedure based on an AND/OR/NOT graph for expected behaviour: Application to a gas turbine, 10th International Congress and Exhibition on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management, Helsinki, Finland. (1997).

  9. C. Siu, Q. Shen and R. Milne, TMDOCTOR: A fuzzy rule-and case-based expert system for turbomachinery diagnosis, Proceedings of IFAC Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes, Kingston Upon Hull, UK. (1997).

  10. Y. G. Li, Performance-analysis-based gas turbine diagnostics: A review, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 216(5)(2002)363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Kamboukos and K. Mathioudakis, Comparison of linear and nonlinear gas turbine performance diagnostics. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 127(1) (2005) 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Naeem, R. Singh and D. Probert, Consequence of areo-engine deteriorations for military aircraft, Applied Energy 70(3) (2001) 103–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kurosaki, T. Morioka and K. Ebina, Fault detection and identification in an IM270 gas turbine using measurements for engine control, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 126(4) (2004) 726–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Xia and Y. H. Wang, Modeling for the calculation of off-design operating conditions of a model PG9171E gas turbine, Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 4(2008) 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Qin, Aerodynamic Design of Axial Flow Compressor, National Defence Industry Press, Beijing, 214–235(1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. R. Howell and R. P. Bonham, Over-all and stage characteristics of axial flow compressors, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 163(1950) 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. H. Wang, A new method of predicting the performance of gas turbine engines, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 113(1991) 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Stamatis, K. Mathioudakis and K. D. Papailiou, Adaptive simulation of gas turbine performance. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 112 (1990) 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. T. Rausch, K. F. Goebel, N. H. Eklund and B. J. Brunell, Integrated in-flight fault detection and accommodation: a Model-based study, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, Reno, Nevada, USA (2005) 05-GT-68300.

  20. H. I. H. Saravanamuttoo, Gas path analysis for pipeline gas turbines. 1st Canadian Symposium on Gas Turbine Operation and Maintenance, USA, (2005).

  21. Z. Ping and S. Hih, Simulation of an advanced twin-spool industrial gas turbine, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 114 (1992) 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Mathioudakis and A. Tsalavoutas, Uncertainty reduction in gas turbine performance diagnostics by accounting for humidity effects. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, New Orleans, USA (2001) 01-GT-0010.

  23. D. Taylor, Implanted component faults and their effects on gas turbine engine performance, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 114 (1992) 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Stamatis, K. Mathioudakis, G. Berios and K. Papailiou, Jet engine fault detection with discrete operating points gas path analysis, Journal of Propulsion, 76(1991) 1043–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Kobayashi and D. Simon, Hybrid neural-genetic algorithm technique for aircraft engine performance diagnostics, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 21(2005) 751–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. V. Groenstredt, A multipoint gas path analysis tool for gas turbine engines with a moderate level of instrumentation, XV International Symposium on Air-Breathing Engines, Bangalore, India, (2001) 1051–1058.

  27. A. Gulati, D. Taylor and R. Sign, Multiple operating point analysis using genetic algorithm optimization for gas turbine diagnostic, XV International Symposium on Air-Breathing Engines, Bangalore, India, (2001) 1–8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Xia.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Tpmg Seop Kim

Di Xia received a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Tongji University and is currently a Ph.D. candidator at the School of Mechanical Engineering at Jiaotong University in Shanghai, China. Dr. Xia’s research interests are in the area of gas turbine and gas path analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xia, D., Wang, Y. & Weng, S. A new method to evaluate the influence coefficient matrix for gas path analysis. J Mech Sci Technol 23, 667–676 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-1117-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-1117-y

Keywords

Navigation