Skip to main content
Log in

Bone density aspects in the biomechanical behavior of ALIF using cylindrical cages and PSF

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cage subsidence and loosening increase with a decrease of bone density. Thus, the stabilization of spinal segments may be dependent on density of cancellous bone. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of bone density on the biomechanical behavior of the ALIF with cylindrical cages and PSF. Nonlinear numerical analysis was carried out by means of finite element method, and various Young’s moduli those have been described by the bone density were employed for the calculation. The range of motion was increased by 120% with decreasing of the density. Relative slip distance increased by 810% at the bone-cage interface and by 1750% at the bone-screw interface with a decrease of the density. Continuous cage subsidence, cage loosening, screw loosening and screw failure would occur particularly during an excessive flexion and/or an excessive axial rotation. The excessive low density would mainly cause pediclescrew loosening due to the remarkable screw slip. In the case of excessively reduced density, therefore, further study is required in order to investigate how to improve the current PSF for the segmental stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le. Mosekilde, Le Mosekilde and C. C. Danielsen, Biomechanical Competence of Vertebral Trabecular Bone in Relation to Ash Density and Age in Normal Individuals, Bone 8 (1987) 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. Carter and W. C. Hayes, The Compressive Behavior of Bone as a Two-Phase Porous Structure, J Bone & Joint Surg 59 (1977) 954–962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. L. Kopperdahl and T. M. Keaveny, Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone, J. Biomech 31 (1998) 601–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Lund, T. T. Oxland, B. Jost, P. Cripton, S. Grassmann, C. Etter and L. P. Nolte, Interbody cage stabilization in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density, J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 (1998) 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Jost, P. A. Cripton, T. Lund, T. T. Oxland, K. Lippuner, P. Jaeger and L. P. Nolte, Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density, Eur Spine J 7 (1998) 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Kim, Prediction of Mechanical Behaviors at Interfaces between Bone and Two Interbody Cages of Lumbar Spine Segments, Spine 26(13) (2001) 1437–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Gerber, N. R. Crawford, R. H. Chamberlain, M. S. Fifield, J. C. LeHuec, C. A. Dickman, Biomechanical Assessment of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with an Anterior Lumbosacral Fixation Screw-Plate: Comparison to Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Anterior Lumbar Interbody fusion with Pedicle Screws in an Unstable Human Cadaver Model, Spine 31(7) (2006) 762–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Kim, Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion; Threaded Cylindrical Cage and Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation, Spine 32(23) (2007) 2558–2568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Tan, C. S. Bailey, M. F. Dvorak, C. G. Fisher, T. R. Oxland, Interbody device shape and size are important to strengthen the vertebra-implant interface, Spine 30(6) (2005) 638–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. M. Pilliar, H. U. Cameron, R. P. Welsh and A. G. Binnington, Radiographic and Morphologic Studies of Load-bearing Porous-surfaced Structured Implants, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 156 (1981) 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Y. Choi and K. H. Sung, Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired standalone rectangular cages, Eur Spine J 15 (2006) 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. D. Ray, Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 22 (1997) 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. H. Smit, A. Odgaard and E. Schneider, Structure and function of vertebral trabecular bone, Spine 22(24) (1997) 2823–2833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. J. Grobler, P. A. Robertson, J. E. Novotny, M. H. Pope, Etiology of Spondylolisthesis: Assessment of the Role Played by Lumbar Facet Joint Morphology, Spine 18(1) (1993) 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Marchand and A. M. Ahmed, Investigation of the Laminate Structure of Lumbar Disc Annulus Fibrosis, Spine 15(5) (1990) 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. M. Panjabi, V. K. Goel, K. Takata, J. Duranceau, M. Krag and M. Price, Human Lumbar Vertebrae — Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy, Spine 17 (1992) 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. M. Panjabi, T. Oxland, K. Takada and V. K. Goel, Duranceau J and Krag M. Articular Facets of the Human Spine: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy, Spine 18(10) (1993) 1298–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Shirazi-Adl, M. Dammak and G. Paiement, Experimental Determination of Friction Characteristics at the Trabecular Bone/Porous-coated Metal Interface in Cementless Implants, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 27 (1993) 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. White and M. M. Panjabi, Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, 2ed, pp.20–28, 106–112 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. K. Antonsson and R. W. Mann, Frequency content of gait. J Biomech 18 (1985) 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. E. Lanyon and C. T. Rubin, Static versus dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodeling. J Biomech 17 (1985) 897–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. T. Rubin and L. E. Lanyon, Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone & Joint Surg 66A (1984) 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. C. Cowin, Bone Mechanics (2ed), CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. L. Skaggs, M. Weidenbaum, J. C. Latridis, A. Ratcliffe and V. C. Mow, Regional Variation in Tensile Properties and Biochemical Composition of the Human Lumbar Annulus Fibrosis, Spine 19(12) (1994) 1310–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Nachemson and J. Evans, Some mechanical Properties of the Third Lumber Inter-laminar Ligament [ligamentum flavum], J Biomech 1 (1968) 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Nachemson, Lumbar Intradiscal Pressure, in: The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain, M.I.V. Jayson, ed., Chap 9, 191–203.

  27. A. G. Patwardhan and K. P. Meade, A Frontal Plane Model of the Lumbar Spine Subjected to a Follower Load: Implications for the Role of Muscles, ASME, J Biomecha Engr, 123(3) (2001), 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Kim.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Young Eun Kim

Young Kim received a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Chonnam National University in 1986. He then went on to receive his M.S. from KAIST and Ph.D. degrees from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1991 and 1996, respectively. Dr. Kim has a lot of industrial experiences over 10 years (1996–2006). Dr. Kim is currently a Research Professor at the School of Mechanical Engineering at Hanyang University in Seoul, Korea. Dr. Kim’s research interests are in the area of spinal biomechanics, mechanical design, product design, environmental machinery design, application of porous materials and ballistic impacts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y. Bone density aspects in the biomechanical behavior of ALIF using cylindrical cages and PSF. J Mech Sci Technol 23, 36–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-1010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-1010-8

Keywords

Navigation