Abstract
The face stability assessments of seismic tunnels have been complicated and crucial problems. To solve this issue, an advanced three-dimensional (3D) rotational failure mechanism with considering seismic effects is developed to assess the seismic face stability of shield tunnels in weak rock masses. The Hoek-Brown (HB) failure criteria is employed to characterize rock masses with weak strength. The corresponding Mohr-Coulomb (MC) parameters are determined using the tangential line method. The modified pseudo-dynamic (MPD) approach is utilized to accurately involve damping property of geomaterials, realistic surface boundary conditions and dynamic properties of seismic waves in face stability assessments. The upper limit analysis approach is utilized for the determination of critical face pressures of seismic tunnels. Comparisons against numerical and analytical solutions demonstrate the efficacy of proposed approach for evaluating the seismic face stability. Subsequently, the impacts of seismic actions and weak rock parameters on face stability are analyzed and a design table is provided for practical use. Finally, the proposed approach is tested by conducting seismic face stability assessments of the JinXiu tunnel with actual seismic response.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A, B and E :
-
The tunnel crown, invert, face center
- A j, A j+1, A′j, and A′j+1 :
-
Horizontal symmetry points on tunnel face
- a h0 :
-
Initial horizontal seismic acceleration at tunnel foundation
- C :
-
Cover depth
- c t :
-
Equivalent cohesion
- C j and C j+1 :
-
The center of the radial plane ΨJ, ΨJ+1
- C s, C sz, S s, S sz, q s1, q s2, C p, S p, C pz, S pz, q p1 and q p2 :
-
Dimensionless functions
- D :
-
Tunnel diameter
- D i :
-
Disturbance coefficient
- E :
-
Young’s modulus
- F :
-
Failure mechanism endpoint
- f :
-
Amplification factor of seismic wave
- f n+1 :
-
Fundamental frequency
- g :
-
Gravity acceleration
- GSI :
-
Geological strength index
- H :
-
Height between ground and tunnel foundation
- HB :
-
Hoek-Brown
- k h, and k v :
-
The horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients
- MC :
-
Mohr-Coulomb
- m i :
-
Constant HB parameters
- MPD :
-
Modified pseudo-dynamic
- N γ N D, N sh and N sv :
-
Dimensionless coefficients
- O :
-
Rotational center O of rotational failure mechanism
- PD :
-
Pseudo-dynamic
- P i,j, P i+1, P i,j+1 and P i+1,j+1 :
-
Points at the failure surface
- PS :
-
Pseudo-static
- r A, r B, r E and r F :
-
Rotation radius of points PA, PB, PE and PF
- r F, b F :
-
Rotational radius and the rotational angle of the point F
- R i,j and R i,j :
-
Polar radius of projected area barycenter Si,j and S′i,j
- R j and b j :
-
Polar coordinates of the discretized element
- S i,j and S′i,j :
-
Projected area onto the symmetric plane of lower triangular element and upper triangular element
- T :
-
Seismic wave period
- t :
-
Time
- u h(y, t) and u v(y, t):
-
Horizontal and vertical displacement at depth y and time t
- u ho and u vo :
-
Horizontal and vertical displacements at tunnel foundation
- v :
-
Linear velocity
- V i,j, V i,j :
-
Volumes of lower and upper triangular elements
- V p and V s :
-
Primary and shear wave velocities
- W D :
-
Internal energy dissipation rates
- W sh and W sv :
-
Horizontal and vertical seismic working rates
- W γ :
-
Working rates induced by rock weight
- W σT :
-
Working rates of supporting forces
- y i,j and y′i,j :
-
The y-coordinate of the barycenter of projected area Si,j and S′i,j
- β A, β B, β E and β F :
-
Angles between lines OA, OB, OE, and OF in relation to the vertical direction
- β i,j and β′i,j :
-
Barycenter polar angle of the projected area Si,j and S′i,j
- γ :
-
Unit rock weight
- φ t :
-
Equivalent friction angle
- κ, s, and μ :
-
Material variables of weak rock
- ν:
-
Poisson’s ratio
- Σj :
-
Discretized element area of tunnel face
- σ 1 :
-
Major principal stresses
- σ 3 :
-
Minor principal stresses
- σ c :
-
Uniaxial compressive strength
- σ n :
-
Normal stress
- σ T :
-
Critical face pressure
- τ :
-
Shear stress
- \(\varpi \) :
-
Angular velocity
- ω :
-
Angular frequency
- ξ :
-
Damping ratio
- Ψ A, Ψ B, and Ψ F :
-
Radial plane of the failure mechanism through points A, B, and F.
- Ψ j and Ψ j+1 :
-
Radial plane of the failure mechanism
References
Bellezza I (2015) Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 33:795–812, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9860-1
Chang S, Zhang S (2018) Engineering geological manual (5th ed). Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, China, 728–733
Chen X, Zhang K, Wang W (2023) Seismic stability analysis of tunnel faces in heterogeneous and anisotropic soils using modified pseudodynamic method. Sustainability 15(14):11083, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411083
Chen GH, Zou JF, Chen JQ (2019) Shallow tunnel face stability considering pore water pressure in non-homogeneous and anisotropic soils. Computers and Geotechnics 116:103205, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103205
Chen GH, Zou JF, Liu SX (2021) Stability analysis of pressurized 3D tunnel face with tensile strength cutoff. International Journal of Geomechanics 21(11):04021226, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002190
Chen GH, Zou JF, Sheng YM, Chen JY, Yang T (2022) Three-dimensional seismic bearing capacity assessment of heterogeneous and anisotropic slopes. International Journal of Geomechanics 22(9):04022148, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002493
Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Building (2016) Ministry of housing and urban-rural development of the people’s republic of China. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, China, 172–217
Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Railway Engineering (2009) Ministry of railways of the people’s republic of China. China Planning Publishing House, Beijing, China, 27–28
Das BM (1993) Principles of soil dynamics. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Di Q, Li P, Zhang M, Guo C, Wang F, Wei Y (2022) Evaluation of tunnel face stability subjected to seismic load based on the non-associated flow rule. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 26(5):2478–2489, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-1561-8
Domaneschi M, Perego U, Borgqvist E, Borsari R (2017) An industry-oriented strategy for the finite element simulation of paperboard creasing and folding. Packaging Technology and Science 30(6):269–294, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2298
Fan WH, Xie SZ, Zhou FC (2023) A case study on adjacent impact zoning and control measures for new double-line shield tunnel undercrossing existing tunnel. Modern Tunnelling Technology 60(4):43–57, DOI: https://doi.org/10.13807/j.cnki.mtt.2023.04.006
Gu XB, Wu QH (2019) Seismic stability analysis of waterfront rock slopes using the modified pseudo-dynamic method. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 37(3):1743–1753, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0718-1
Halder K, Chakraborty D (2023) Estimation of seismic active earth pressure on reinforced retaining wall using lower bound limit analysis and modified pseudo-dynamic method. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 51(1):100–116, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.10.001
Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division 106(9):1013–1035, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001029
Hoek E, Brown ET (2019) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI–2018 edition. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 11(3):445–463, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proceedings of the North American Rock Mechanics Society Meeting, July 2002; 267–273, Toronto, Canada
Hou CT, Yang XL (2020) Seismic Stability of 3D tunnel face considering tensile strength cut-off. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 24(7): 2232–2243, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1804-5
Huang Q, Zou JF, Qian ZH (2020) Seismic stability analysis of tunnel face in purely cohesive soil by a pseudo-dynamic approach. Geomechanics and Engineering 23(1):1–13, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.23.1.001
Ibrahim E, Soubra AH, Mollon G, Raphael W, Dias D, Reda A (2015) Three-dimensional face stability analysis of pressurized tunnels driven in a multilayered purely frictional medium. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 49:18–34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.001
Kim D (2021) Large deformation finite element analyses in TBM tunnel excavation: CEL and auto-remeshing approach. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 116:104081, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104081
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education, India
Li T, Pan Q, Shen Z, Gong W (2022a) Probabilistic stability analysis of a tunnel face in spatially random hoek-brown rock masses with a multi-tangent method. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 55(6):3545–3561, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02821-y
Li P, Wei Y, Zhang M, Huang Q, Wang F (2022b) Influence of non-associated flow rule on passive face instability for shallow shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 119:104202, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104202
Liu J, Xu S, Yang XL (2022) Modified pseudo-dynamic bearing capacity of strip footing on rock masses. Computers and Geotechnics 150:104897, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104897
Maghous S, de Buhan P, Bekaert A (1998) Failure design of jointed rock structures by means of a homogenization approach. Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials: An International Journal on Experiments, Modelling and Computation of Materials and Structures 3(3):207–228, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199807)3:3<207::AID-CFM46>3.0.CO;2-X
Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra AH (2009) Probabilistic analysis and design of circular tunnels against face stability. International Journal of Geomechanics 9(6):237–249, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:6(237)
Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra AH (2011) Rotational failure mechanisms for the face stability analysis of tunnels driven by a pressurized shield. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 35(12):1363–1388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.962
Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra AH (2013) Continuous velocity fields for collapse and blowout of a pressurized tunnel face in purely cohesive soil. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 37(13):2061–2083, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2121
Pain A, Choudhury D, Bhattacharyya S K (2017) Seismic rotational stability of gravity retaining walls by modified pseudo-dynamic method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 94:244–253, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.016
Pan Q, Dias D (2016) The effect of pore water pressure on tunnel face stability. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 40(15):2123–2136, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2528
Pan Q, Dias D (2018) Three-dimensional static and seismic stability analysis of a tunnel face driven in weak rock masses. International Journal of Geomechanics 18(6):04018055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001174
Rahaman O, Raychowdhury P (2017) Seismic active earth pressure on bilinear retaining walls using a modified pseudo-dynamic method. International Journal of Geo-Engineering 8:1–24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0040-4
Saada Z, Maghous S, Garnier D (2013) Pseudo-static analysis of tunnel face stability using the generalized Hoek-Brown strength criterion. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 37(18):3194–3212, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2185
Soufi GR, Chenari RJ, Javankhoshdel S (2021) Conventional vs. modified pseudo-dynamic seismic analyses in the shallow strip footing bearing capacity problem. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 20:993–1006, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2064-1
Steedman RS, Zeng X (1990) The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall. Geotechnique 40(1):103–112, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103
Su Y, Wang GF, Zhou QH (2014) Tunnel face stability and ground settlement in pressurized shield tunnelling. Journal of Central South University 21(4):1600–1606, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2101-6
Tang XW, Liu W, Albers B, Savidis S (2014) Upper bound analysis of tunnel face stability in layered soils. Acta Geotechnica 9:661–671, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0256-1
Vermeer PA, Ruse N, Marcher T (2002) Tunnel heading stability in drained ground. Felsbau 20(6):8–18, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228751251_Tunnel_Heading_Stability_in_Drained_Ground
Xu S, Liu J, Yang XL (2023) Pseudo-dynamic analysis of a 3D tunnel face in inclined weak strata. Underground Space 12:156–166, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2023.03.002
Yang XL, Yin JH (2006) Linear Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters from the non-linear Hoek-Brown rock masses. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 41(8):1000–1005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2006.08.003
Yang Y, Zhou D (2022) Seismic stability for 3D two-step slope governed by non-linearity in soils using modified pseudo-dynamic approach. Applied Sciences 12(13):6482, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136482
Zhang M, Di Q, Li P, Wei Y, Wang F (2022a) Influence of non-associated flow rule on face stability for tunnels in cohesive-frictional soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 121:104320, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104320
Zhang B, Jiang J, Zhang DB, Liu Z (2021a) Upper bound solution of collapse pressure and permanent displacement of 3D tunnel faces using the pseudo-dynamic method and the kinematic approach. Geomechanics and Engineering 25(6):521–533, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.25.6.521
Zhang D, Sun W, Wang C, Yu B (2021b) Reliability analysis of seismic stability of shield tunnel face under multiple correlated failure modes. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 25(8):3172–3185, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-2174-3
Zhang JH, Xu P, Sun WC, Li B (2022b) Seismic reliability analysis of shield tunnel faces under multiple failure modes by pseudo-dynamic method and response surface method. Journal of Central South University 29(5):1553–1564, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5067-9
Zhang JH, Zhang B (2019) Reliability analysis for seismic stability of tunnel faces in soft rock masses based on a 3D stochastic collapse model. Journal of Central South University 26(7):1706–1718, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4127-2
Zhao L, Yu C, Li L, An A, Nie Z, Peng A, Zuo S (2020) Rock slope reliability analysis using Barton-Bandis failure criterion with modified pseudo-dynamic approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 139:106310, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106310
Zhong JH, Yang XL (2020) Kinematic analysis of the three-dimensional stability for tunnel faces by pseudodynamic approach. Computers and Geotechnics 128:103802, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103802
Zhong JH, Yang XL (2022) Pseudo-dynamic stability of rock slope considering Hoek-Brown strength criterion. Acta Geotechnica 17(6):2481–2494, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01425-0
Zhou JW, Cui P, Yang XG (2013) Dynamic process analysis for the initiation and movement of the Donghekou landslide-debris flow triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 76:70–84, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.08.007
Zou J, Chen G, Qian Z (2019) Tunnel face stability in cohesion-frictional soils considering the soil arching effect by improved failure models. Computers and Geotechnics 106:1–17, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.10.014
Acknowledgements
The support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB1201204) is greatly appreciated. The support from the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Major Project (Qian-ke-he-zhong-da-zhuan-xiang-zi [2018]3010) is also greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zou, J., Li, S. & Chen, G. Three-Dimensional Face Stability Assessments of Seismic Tunnels in Weak Rock Masses. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 2469–2485 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1887-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1887-5