Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Geosynthetic Materials for Tunnel Drains: Laboratory Tests and Image Analyses

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Tunnel drainage systems are crucial design factors in tunnels because the accumulation of groundwater at the back of linings can affect tunnel safety. Geotextiles are used to facilitate the dissipation of pore-water pressure. However, chemical agents in the water can lead to clogging as tunnels age. In this study, laboratory tests and image analysis, namely Secondary Scanning Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDS), were conducted to assess the drain performance of five geosynthetic materials: four geocomposites and one three-layered Non-Woven Needle-Punched (NWNP) geotextile. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in liquids affects the discharge capacity of drains, and this capacity decreases with increasing confining pressure. NWNP geotextile is the most vulnerable to confining pressure as it lacks a core. The reason behind the significant decrease in the discharge capacity of NWNP geotextile is clarified based on the SEM analysis. EDS analysis investigated the major composition of the clogged materials, revealing that the primary components are carbon, oxygen, and calcium. Advanced imaging techniques can be utilized to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The results of this study can aid in the design and maintenance of engineering systems, especially tunnel drainage systems, that incorporate geosynthetic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D4716-08 (2013) Standard test method for determining the (In-plane) flow rate per unit width and hydraulic transmissivity of a geosynthetic using a constant head. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/D4716-08

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun BS, Jang YS, Kim B (2011) Final report: Development of technology for improving the tunnel drainage system in old tunnels. Seoul Metropolitan Government, Republic of Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel M, Rinder T, Leis A, Reichl P, Sellner P, Draschitz C, Plank G, Klammer D, Schofer H (2008) Koralm tunnel as a case study for sinter formation in drainage systems–precipitation mechanisms and retaliatory action. Geomechanik und Tunnelbau 1(4):271–278, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.200800024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2005) Highway and rail transit tunnel inspection manual. FHWA-NHI-09e010. Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoyne M (2002) Influence of grout and cement on groundwater composition. Possiva Working Report, 7: 44, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 12958-2 (2020) Geotextile and geotextile related products - determination of water flow capacity in their plane, International Organisation for Standardisation, CH-1211, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang YS, Kim B, Lee JW (2015) Evaluation of discharge capacity of geosynthetic drains for potential use in tunnels. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 43(3):228–239, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KEC (2010) Quality and test standard of construction materials for express highway construction, Korea Expressway Corporation (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • KICT (2009) Development of safety maintenance and disaster prevention technology (VI) KICT Report 2009-069. Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Kyeonggi-do, Korea, 233 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • KR (2017) Standard specification for tunnel design. KR C-12060_Rev.2, Korea Rail Network Authority (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostveen JP, Troost GH (1990) Discharge index tests on vertical drains. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomebranes, and Related Products: Steep slopes and walls. Embankments on soft soil. Roads and railroads. Filtration and drainage. Erosion control, The Hague, Netherlands 1:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin JH, Potts DM, Zdravkovic L (2005) The effect of pore-water pressure on NATM tunnel lining in decomposed granite soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42(6):1585–1599, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel FR, Reams MW (1966) Temperature effect on precipitation of calcium carbonate from calcium bicarbonate solutions and its application to cavern environments. Sedimentology 7:241–248, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1966.tb01597.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo JT, Yoo SG (2004) A study on analysis of influx path and ingredient of sedimentation substance in tunnel drainage system. Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association 8(4):145–153 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Dongguk University Research Fund of 2023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bumjoo Kim.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, Y., Cha, W., Yoo, WK. et al. Assessment of Geosynthetic Materials for Tunnel Drains: Laboratory Tests and Image Analyses. KSCE J Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1690-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1690-3

Keywords

Navigation