Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Evaluation of Estimating Local Bed Shear Stress Using Log Law in a Straight River Channel

  • Forefront of Modelings, Measurements, and Machine Learnings of Hydro-environmental Flows
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Bed shear stress is a critical parameter in riverine environments, directly influencing sediment transport, erosion, deposition, and flow dynamics. However, direct measurement of bed shear stress in natural rivers is nearly impossible, and estimating bed shear stress by extrapolating the Reynolds stress profile, though known for accuracy, faces practical limitations due to the challenges of measuring turbulence in natural rivers. As alternatives, indirect methods, such as global bed shear stress estimation based on bed slope and hydraulic radius (assuming uniform flow) and local bed shear stress estimation through regression of velocity profiles using the log law, have been employed. The estimation of local bed shear stress using the log law has primarily been derived from laboratory flow conditions due to the limitations in observing detailed turbulence in field conditions. Consequently, the applicability of the log-law method under field conditions has not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aims to assess local bed shear stress using the log law through a dedicated field experiment in a specific river condition, comparing it with methods utilizing the Reynolds stress profile. The experiment was conducted in a straight river channel with a width of approximately 6.5 m, a depth of 0.61 m, and a mean flow velocity of 0.56 m/s. A total of 197 points of regularly distributed velocity and turbulence data for the given cross-section were acquired using micro-acoustic Doppler velocimeter measurements with a duration of 90 s. We found that the log-law method overestimated local bed shear stress by an overall factor of 2.3 compared to the method using Reynolds stress profiles. Thus, the experimental results conclusively indicate that local bed shear stress estimated from the log law in natural river conditions could be overestimated. However, additional research is needed under more diverse flow and geometric conditions to develop a correction formula for applying the log law in estimating local bed shear stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afzalimehr H, Rennie CD (2009) Determination of bed shear stress in gravel-bed rivers using boundary layer parameters. Hydrological Sciences Journal 54(1):147–159, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.1.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherimiyab F, Lemmin U (2013) Shear velocity estimates in rough-bed open-channel flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38(14):1714–1724, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banjavcic S (2018) Understanding longitudinal ADCP measurements to determine water velocities for open channel flow. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  • Bathurst JC (1997) Environmental river flow hydraulics. Applied fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management, Ch. 4:69–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Biron PM, Robson C, Lapointe MF, Gaskin SJ (2004) Comparing different methods of bed shear stress estimates in simple and complex flow fields. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group 29(11): 1403–1415, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Im D (2001) Turbulence measurements of open-channel flows over concrete blocks with uniform roughness height. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering 21(1):11–21 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Yang W, Park M (2003) Turbulent and coherent structures of vegetated open-channel flows affected by water depth. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering 23(3):165–174 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser FH (1954) Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 21(2):91–108, DOI:https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero M, Lamberti A (2011) Flow field and morphology mapping using ADCP and multibeam techniques: Survey in the Po River. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 137(12):1576–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keulegan GH (1938) Laws of the turbulent flow in open channels. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 21(12): 707–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Hwang JH (2023) Estimating bed shear stress distribution over bottom of a channel on the moving vessel. Ocean Science Journal 58(1):3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-022-00095-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DS, Kang BS (2011) Validation of assessment for mean flow field using spatial averaging of instantaneous ADCP velocity measurements. Journal of Environmental Science International 20(1):107–118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.1.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SC, Friedrichs CT, Maa JY, Wright LD (2000) Estimating bottom stress in tidal boundary layer from acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 126(6):399–06, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:6(399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostaschuk R, Villard P, Best J (2004) Measuring velocity and shear stress over dunes with acoustic Doppler profiler. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130(9):932–936, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:9(932)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller D, Wagner C (2009) Measuring discharge with acoustic Doppler current profilers from a moving boat. USGS Techniques and Methods 3-A22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A22

  • Murphy E, Jackson R (2013) Hydraulic and water-quality data collection for the investigation of Great Lakes tributaries for Asian carp spawning and egg-transport suitability. USGS Report 2013–5106

  • Muste M, Kim D, González-Castro JA (2010) Near-transducer errors in ADCP measurements: Experimental findings. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 136(5):275–289, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muste M, Yu K, Pratt TC, Abraham D (2002) ADCP measurements at fixed river locations. In Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods, 1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/40655(2002)73

  • Nezu I, Nakagawa H (1993) Turbulence in open-channel flows. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203734902

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezu I, Rodi W (1986) Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 112(5): 335–355, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:5(335)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom EA, Rehmann CR, Oberg KA (2007) Evaluation of mean velocity and turbulence measurements. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 133(12):1310–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Kim Y, Park Y, Jo J, Kang K (2016) Direct measurement of bottom shear stress under high-velocity flow conditions. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 50:121–127, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie J, Diplas P, Nam S, Gutierrez MS (2010) Local boundary shear stress estimates from velocity profiles measured with an ADCP. River Flow, 1749–1755

  • Rajaratnam M, Muralidhar D (1969) Boundary shear distribution in rectangular open channels. La Houille Balanche 24(6):603–609, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/1969047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie C, Church M (2010) Mapping spatial distributions and uncertainty of water and sediment flux in a large gravel bed river reach using an acoustic Doppler current profiler. Journal of Geophysical Research 115:F03035, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie C, Miller R (2004) Measurement of the spatial distribution of fluvial bedload transport velocity in both sand and gravel. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29:1173–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin K (2010) Methodology for calculating shear stress in a meandering channel. MS Thesis, Colorado State University

  • Sime LC, Ferguson RI, Church M (2007) Estimating shear stress from moving boat acoustic Doppler velocity measurements in a large gravel-bed river. Water Resource Research 43:W03418, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart GM (1999) Turbulent velocity profiles and boundary shear in gravel bed rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 125(2):106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SonTek (2010) RiverSurveyor S5/M9 System Manual, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:2(106)

  • Stacy MT, Monismith SG, Burau JR (1999) Measurements of Reynolds stress profiles in unstratified tidal flow. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(C5):10933–10949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns FP (1883) On the current-meter, together with a reason why the maximum velocity of water flowing in open channels is below the surface. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 12(1):301–338, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0000467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone MC, Hotchkiss RH (2007) Evaluating velocity measurement techniques in shallow streams. Journal of Hydraulic Research 45(6): 752–762, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhodolov A, Thiele M, Bungartz H (1998) Turbulence structure in a river reach with sand bed. Water Resources Research 34(5):1317–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szupiany R, Amsler M, Best J, Parsons D (2007) Comparison of fixed-and moving-vessel flow measurements with an aDp in a large river. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 133(12):1299–1309, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1299)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes H, Lumley JL (1972) A first course in turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco DW, Hunhta CA (2009) Experimental verification of acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) performance in fine-grained, high sediment concentration fluids. SonTek/YSI Technical Note

  • Vermeulen B, Hoitink AJF, Sassi MG (2013) On the use of horizontal acoustic Doppler profilers for continuous bed shear stress monitoring. International Journal of Sediment Research 28(2):260–268, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(13)60037-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westenbroek SM (2006) Estimates of shear stress and measurements of water levels in the Lower Fox River near Green Bay, Wisconsin

  • White FM (2017) Fluid Mechanics, 8th edition

  • Wilcock PR (1996) Estimating local shear stress from velocity observation. Water Resources Research 32(11):3361–3366, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR02277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang WJ, Choi SU (2005) Turbulence measurements of open-channel flows with laser-Doppler anemometer. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering 25(2B):123–134 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the R&D program for innovative flood protection technologies against climate crisis, funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (RS-2023-00218973).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jongmin Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D., Kim, J., Son, G. et al. Experimental Evaluation of Estimating Local Bed Shear Stress Using Log Law in a Straight River Channel. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 1094–1107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1399-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1399-3

Keywords

Navigation