Abstract
Bed shear stress is a critical parameter in riverine environments, directly influencing sediment transport, erosion, deposition, and flow dynamics. However, direct measurement of bed shear stress in natural rivers is nearly impossible, and estimating bed shear stress by extrapolating the Reynolds stress profile, though known for accuracy, faces practical limitations due to the challenges of measuring turbulence in natural rivers. As alternatives, indirect methods, such as global bed shear stress estimation based on bed slope and hydraulic radius (assuming uniform flow) and local bed shear stress estimation through regression of velocity profiles using the log law, have been employed. The estimation of local bed shear stress using the log law has primarily been derived from laboratory flow conditions due to the limitations in observing detailed turbulence in field conditions. Consequently, the applicability of the log-law method under field conditions has not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aims to assess local bed shear stress using the log law through a dedicated field experiment in a specific river condition, comparing it with methods utilizing the Reynolds stress profile. The experiment was conducted in a straight river channel with a width of approximately 6.5 m, a depth of 0.61 m, and a mean flow velocity of 0.56 m/s. A total of 197 points of regularly distributed velocity and turbulence data for the given cross-section were acquired using micro-acoustic Doppler velocimeter measurements with a duration of 90 s. We found that the log-law method overestimated local bed shear stress by an overall factor of 2.3 compared to the method using Reynolds stress profiles. Thus, the experimental results conclusively indicate that local bed shear stress estimated from the log law in natural river conditions could be overestimated. However, additional research is needed under more diverse flow and geometric conditions to develop a correction formula for applying the log law in estimating local bed shear stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afzalimehr H, Rennie CD (2009) Determination of bed shear stress in gravel-bed rivers using boundary layer parameters. Hydrological Sciences Journal 54(1):147–159, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.1.147
Bagherimiyab F, Lemmin U (2013) Shear velocity estimates in rough-bed open-channel flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38(14):1714–1724, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3421
Banjavcic S (2018) Understanding longitudinal ADCP measurements to determine water velocities for open channel flow. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bathurst JC (1997) Environmental river flow hydraulics. Applied fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management, Ch. 4:69–93
Biron PM, Robson C, Lapointe MF, Gaskin SJ (2004) Comparing different methods of bed shear stress estimates in simple and complex flow fields. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group 29(11): 1403–1415, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1111
Choi S, Im D (2001) Turbulence measurements of open-channel flows over concrete blocks with uniform roughness height. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering 21(1):11–21 (in Korean)
Choi S, Yang W, Park M (2003) Turbulent and coherent structures of vegetated open-channel flows affected by water depth. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering 23(3):165–174 (in Korean)
Clauser FH (1954) Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 21(2):91–108, DOI:https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2938
Guerrero M, Lamberti A (2011) Flow field and morphology mapping using ADCP and multibeam techniques: Survey in the Po River. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 137(12):1576–1587
Keulegan GH (1938) Laws of the turbulent flow in open channels. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 21(12): 707–741
Kim DH, Hwang JH (2023) Estimating bed shear stress distribution over bottom of a channel on the moving vessel. Ocean Science Journal 58(1):3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-022-00095-7
Kim DS, Kang BS (2011) Validation of assessment for mean flow field using spatial averaging of instantaneous ADCP velocity measurements. Journal of Environmental Science International 20(1):107–118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.1.107
Kim SC, Friedrichs CT, Maa JY, Wright LD (2000) Estimating bottom stress in tidal boundary layer from acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 126(6):399–06, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:6(399
Kostaschuk R, Villard P, Best J (2004) Measuring velocity and shear stress over dunes with acoustic Doppler profiler. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130(9):932–936, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:9(932)
Mueller D, Wagner C (2009) Measuring discharge with acoustic Doppler current profilers from a moving boat. USGS Techniques and Methods 3-A22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A22
Murphy E, Jackson R (2013) Hydraulic and water-quality data collection for the investigation of Great Lakes tributaries for Asian carp spawning and egg-transport suitability. USGS Report 2013–5106
Muste M, Kim D, González-Castro JA (2010) Near-transducer errors in ADCP measurements: Experimental findings. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 136(5):275–289, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000173
Muste M, Yu K, Pratt TC, Abraham D (2002) ADCP measurements at fixed river locations. In Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods, 1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/40655(2002)73
Nezu I, Nakagawa H (1993) Turbulence in open-channel flows. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203734902
Nezu I, Rodi W (1986) Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 112(5): 335–355, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:5(335)
Nystrom EA, Rehmann CR, Oberg KA (2007) Evaluation of mean velocity and turbulence measurements. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 133(12):1310–1318
Park J, Kim Y, Park Y, Jo J, Kang K (2016) Direct measurement of bottom shear stress under high-velocity flow conditions. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 50:121–127, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.12.008
Petrie J, Diplas P, Nam S, Gutierrez MS (2010) Local boundary shear stress estimates from velocity profiles measured with an ADCP. River Flow, 1749–1755
Rajaratnam M, Muralidhar D (1969) Boundary shear distribution in rectangular open channels. La Houille Balanche 24(6):603–609, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/1969047
Rennie C, Church M (2010) Mapping spatial distributions and uncertainty of water and sediment flux in a large gravel bed river reach using an acoustic Doppler current profiler. Journal of Geophysical Research 115:F03035, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001556
Rennie C, Miller R (2004) Measurement of the spatial distribution of fluvial bedload transport velocity in both sand and gravel. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29:1173–1193
Shin K (2010) Methodology for calculating shear stress in a meandering channel. MS Thesis, Colorado State University
Sime LC, Ferguson RI, Church M (2007) Estimating shear stress from moving boat acoustic Doppler velocity measurements in a large gravel-bed river. Water Resource Research 43:W03418, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005069
Smart GM (1999) Turbulent velocity profiles and boundary shear in gravel bed rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 125(2):106–116
SonTek (2010) RiverSurveyor S5/M9 System Manual, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:2(106)
Stacy MT, Monismith SG, Burau JR (1999) Measurements of Reynolds stress profiles in unstratified tidal flow. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(C5):10933–10949
Stearns FP (1883) On the current-meter, together with a reason why the maximum velocity of water flowing in open channels is below the surface. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 12(1):301–338, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0000467
Stone MC, Hotchkiss RH (2007) Evaluating velocity measurement techniques in shallow streams. Journal of Hydraulic Research 45(6): 752–762, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521813
Sukhodolov A, Thiele M, Bungartz H (1998) Turbulence structure in a river reach with sand bed. Water Resources Research 34(5):1317–1334
Szupiany R, Amsler M, Best J, Parsons D (2007) Comparison of fixed-and moving-vessel flow measurements with an aDp in a large river. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 133(12):1299–1309, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1299)
Tennekes H, Lumley JL (1972) A first course in turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge
Velasco DW, Hunhta CA (2009) Experimental verification of acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) performance in fine-grained, high sediment concentration fluids. SonTek/YSI Technical Note
Vermeulen B, Hoitink AJF, Sassi MG (2013) On the use of horizontal acoustic Doppler profilers for continuous bed shear stress monitoring. International Journal of Sediment Research 28(2):260–268, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(13)60037-2
Westenbroek SM (2006) Estimates of shear stress and measurements of water levels in the Lower Fox River near Green Bay, Wisconsin
White FM (2017) Fluid Mechanics, 8th edition
Wilcock PR (1996) Estimating local shear stress from velocity observation. Water Resources Research 32(11):3361–3366, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR02277
Yang WJ, Choi SU (2005) Turbulence measurements of open-channel flows with laser-Doppler anemometer. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering 25(2B):123–134 (in Korean)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the R&D program for innovative flood protection technologies against climate crisis, funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (RS-2023-00218973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D., Kim, J., Son, G. et al. Experimental Evaluation of Estimating Local Bed Shear Stress Using Log Law in a Straight River Channel. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 1094–1107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1399-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1399-3