Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical Evaluation of Failure Mechanisms and Retrofitting of Connections in Mass Timber Buildings

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

With the growing trend in industry towards zero carbon construction, mass timber structures are becoming more accepted globally. Beam-to-column connections in mass timber buildings are currently designed to carry shear actions. However, the connections may be considered to take moment actions and large rotations to comply with ductility and robustness requirements of the building standards. The current study deploys finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the failure due to large deformation and rotation of a typical bolted beam-to-column connection and provides an economic retrofitting design solution using self-tapping screws (STS). The FEA is validated against current or published experimental results and is used to conduct a thorough assessment of the retrofitted connection. It is shown that a proper arrangement of screws can delay the brittle failure, develop significant moment-resisting capacity, and enhance the rotational ductility of the connection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen R (2017) Mjøstårnet-Construction of an 81 m tall timber building. Paper presented at the Internationales Holzbau-Forum IHF, https://www.forum-holzbau.com/pdf/31_IHF2017_Abrahamsen.pdf

  • Alfano G, Crisfield MA (2001) Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: Mechanical and computational issues. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 50(7):1701–1736, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.93

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aloisio A, Boggian F, Tomasi R (2022) Design of a novel seismic retrofitting system for RC structures based on asymmetric friction connections and CLT panels. Engineering Structures 254:113807, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshaikh IM, Abadel AA, Alrubaidi M (2022) Precast RC structures’ progressive collapse resistance: Current knowledge and future requirements. Paper presented at the Structures, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.086

  • ANSYS (2018) Academic research mechanical, Release 18.1

  • Ardalany M, Deam B, Fragiacomo M (2012) Experimental results of fracture energy and fracture toughness of Radiata Pine laminated veneer lumber (LVL) in mode I (opening). Materials and Structures 45(8):1189–1205, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9826-1 i]AS/NZ-1080.1 (2012) Timber-Methods of test, Method 1: Moisture content. Standards Australia Limited

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AS/NZ-1170.0 (2002) Structural design action, Part 0: General principles. In. Sydney, NSW: Standards Australia Limited

  • AS/NZS-1170.1 (2002) Structural design actions. In Australia

  • AS1275 (1985) Metric screw threads for fasteners. In: Homebush: Standards Australia

  • AS1720.1 (2010) Timber structures. Part 1: Design methods (Vol. AS1720): Standard Australia Limited

  • AS4291.1 (2010) Mechanical properties of fasteners made of carbon steel and alloy steel. Standards Australia, Standards Australia Limited

  • ASTM-D143-14 (2010) Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber. Street: Washington, DC, USA

  • Bader TK, Schweigler M, Serrano E, Dorn M, Enquist B, Hochreiner G (2016) Integrative experimental characterization and engineering modeling of single-dowel connections in LVL. Construction and Building Materials 107:235–246, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaß H, Colling F (2015) Load-carrying capacity of dowelled connections. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 48th INTER Meeting

  • Blaß HJ, Schädle P (2011) Ductility aspects of reinforced and non-reinforced timber joints. Engineering Structures 33(11):3018–3026, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchaïr A, Racher P, Bocquet J (2007) Analysis of dowelled timber to timber moment-resisting joints. Materials and Structures 40(10): 1127–1141, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9210-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brühl F, Kuhlmann U, Jorissen A (2011) Consideration of plasticity within the design of timber structures due to connection ductility. Engineering Structures 33(11):3007–3017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X, Gilbert BP, Guan H, Underhill ID, Karampour H (2021) Experimental dynamic collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber frames under a sudden column removal scenario. Engineering Structures 233:111918, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton J (2015) Solid timber in carbon neutral construction in the UK. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia

  • Claus T, Seim W, Küllmer J (2022) Force distribution in self-tapping screws: Experimental investigations with fibre Bragg grating measurement screws. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 80(1):183–197, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01740-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi S, Karampour H, Bailleres H, Gilbert BP, Fernando D (2020a) Load bearing sandwich timber walls with plywood faces and bamboo core. Structures 27:2437–2450, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi S, Karampour H, Bailleres H, Gilbert BP, McGavin RL (2020b) Experimental study on bending and shear behaviours of composite timber sandwich panels. Construction and Building Materials 259: 119723, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi S, Karampour H, Gilbert BP, Bailleres H (2018) Numerical study on the flexural capacity of ultra-light composite timber sandwich panels. Composites Part B: Engineering 155:212–224, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoD (2016) UFsC 4-023-03: Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03, Washington, DC, USA

  • dos Santos CL, de Jesus AM, Morais JJ (2015) Embedment strength characterization of pine wood. Numerical study of the non-linear behaviour. Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais 27(1):15–26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctmat.2015.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EN-408 (2003) Timber structures. Structural timber and glued laminated timber. Determination of some physical and mechanical properties. In: European Committee for Standardization Brussels

  • EN1995-1 (2004) Design of timber structures-Part 1-1: General-common rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

  • EOTA (2012) European organisation for technical assessment. European technical approval ETA-12/0063. Brussels, Belgium: Eota

  • Franke B, Quenneville P (2011) Numerical modeling of the failure behavior of dowel connections in wood. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 137(3):186–195, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke B, Quenneville P (2014) Analysis of the fracture behavior of Radiata Pine timber and Laminated Veneer Lumber. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 116:1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehloff M, Closen M, Lam F (2010) Reduced edge distances in bolted timber moment connections with perpendicular to grain reinforcements. Paper presented at the World Conference on Timber Engineering, Italy

  • GSA (2016) Alternate path Analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance. Washington, DC, USA: General Service Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi A, Zarnani P, Masoudnia R, Quenneville P (2018) Experimental testing of rocking cross-laminated timber walls with resilient slip friction joints. Journal of Structural Engineering 144(1):04017180, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson N (2016) Robustness in structures. Retrieved from Melbourne, Australia

  • Hong J-P (2007) Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model for single and multiple dowel-type wood connections. University of British Columbia, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber JA, Ekevad M, Girhammar UA, Berg S (2019) Structural robustness and timber buildings–a review. Wood Material Science & Engineering 14(2):107–128, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2018.1446052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber JA, Ekevad M, Girhammar UA, Berg S (2020) Finite element analysis of alternative load paths in a platform-framed CLT building. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings 173(5):379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IStruct E (2010) Practical guide to structural robustness and disproportionate collapse in buildings. London, UK: Institution of Structural Engineers U6

  • Jensen JL, Nakatani M, Quenneville P, Walford B (2011) A simple unified model for withdrawal of lag screws and glued-in rods. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 69(4):537–544, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-010-0478-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL, Nakatani M, Quenneville P, Walford B (2012) A simplified model for withdrawal of screws from end-grain of timber. Construction and Building Materials 29:557–563, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorissen A, Fragiacomo M (2011) General notes on ductility in timber structures. Engineering Structures 33(11):2987–2997, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karampour H, Bourges M, Gilbert BP, Bismire A, Bailleres H, Guan H (2020) Compressive behaviour of novel timber-filled steel tubular (TFST) columns. Construction and Building Materials 238:117734, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kildashti K, Alinoori F, Moshiri F, Samali B (2021) Computational simulation of light timber framing connections strengthened with self-tapping screws. Journal of Building Engineering 44:103003, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam F, Schulte-Wrede M, Yao C, Gu J (2008) Moment resistance of bolted timber connections with perpendicular to grain reinforcements. Paper presented at the World Conference on Timber Engineering, Japan

  • Lim NS, Tan KH, Lee CK (2017) Experimental studies of 3D RC substructures under exterior and corner column removal scenarios. Engineering Structures 150(Supplement C):409–427, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling Z, Rong X, Xiang Z (2021) Laterally loaded performance of single dowel-type fastener used for steel plate-to-timber connections. Journal of Structures, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.115

  • Lu B, Lu W, Li H, Zheng W (2022) Mechanical behavior of V-shaped timber folded-plate structure joints reinforced with self-tapping screws. Journal of Building Engineering 45:103617, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu C, Gilbert B, Guan H, Underhill I, Gunalan S, Karampour H (2021a) Experimental study on the quasi-static progressive collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber buildings under an edge column removal scenario. Engineering Structures 228:111425, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu C, Gilbert B, Guan H, Underhill I, Gunalan S, Karampour H, Masaeli M (2020) Experimental collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber frames under a quasi-static column removal scenario. Engineering Structures 213:110562, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu CH, Gilbert BP, Guan H, Underhill ID, Gunalan S, Karampour H (2021b) Experimental study on the quasi-static progressive collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber buildings under corner column removal scenarios. Engineering Structures 242:112497, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masaeli M, Gilbert BP, Karampour H, Underhill ID, Lyu CH, Gunalan S (2020) Scaling effect on the moment and shear responses of three types of beam-to-column connectors used in mass timber buildings. Engineering Structures 208:110329, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masaeli M, Karampour H, Gilbert BP, Talebian N, Behnia A (2022) Numerical assessment of the interaction between shear and moment actions in LVL bolted connections. Journal of Building Engineering 104695, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104695

  • Mpidi Bita H, Tannert T (2020) Experimental study of disproportionate collapse prevention mechanisms for mass-timber floor systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 146(2):04019199, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDS (2005) National design specification (NDS) for wood construction-commentary. In. Washington (DC, USA): American Forest & Paper Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell J, Sagaseta J, Cormie D, Jones A (2019) Historical review of prescriptive design rules for robustness after the collapse of Ronan Point. Paper presented at the Structures

  • Schoenmakers JD, Svensson S (2011) Embedment tests perpendicular to the grain–optical measurements of deformation fields. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 69(1):133–142, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-009-0404-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatopoulos H, Malo KA (2015) Withdrawal capacity of threaded rods embedded in timber elements. Construction and Building Materials 94:387–397, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannert T, Lam F (2009) Self-tapping screws as reinforcement for rounded dovetail connections. Structural Control and Health 16(3):374–384, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UKTFA (2008) Structural guidance for platform timber frame. The UK Timber Frame Association, Alloa, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkersen O (1938) Die Nietkraftverteilung in zugbeanspruchten Nietverbindungen mit konstanten Laschenquerschnitten. Luftfahrtfor Schung 15:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Voulpiotis K, Köhler J, Jockwer R, Frangi A (2019) Robustness in Tall Timber Buildings-An Improved Framework. Paper presented at the INTER Meeting

  • Wang W, Fang C, Qin X, Chen Y, Li L (2016) Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse. Engineering Structures 106:332–347, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WoodProducts C (2015) Futurebuild® LVL Specific Engineering Design Guide. In: C. H. Wood-Product (Ed.). New Zealand: CarterHoltHarvey WoodProducts

  • Xu B-H, Bouchaïr A, Racher P (2015) Mechanical behavior and modeling of dowelled steel-to-timber moment-resisting connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 141(6):04014165, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Tan KH (2013) Structural behavior of RC beam-column subassemblages under a middle column removal scenario. Journal of Structural Engineering 139(2):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Guo H, Jung K, Harris R, Chang W-S (2019) Screw reinforcement on dowel-type moment-resisting connections with cracks. Construction and Building Materials 215:59–72, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Department, Aurecon, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia

    Mahyar Masaeli

  2. Griffith School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, QLD, 4222, Australia

    Hassan Karampour, Benoit P. Gilbert & Hong Guan

  3. Infrastructure-Construction Engineering, Robert Bird Group, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia

    Arash Behnia

  4. Faculty of Society & Design, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia

    Nima Talebian

Authors
  1. Mahyar Masaeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hassan Karampour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benoit P. Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arash Behnia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nima Talebian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Karampour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masaeli, M., Karampour, H., Gilbert, B.P. et al. Numerical Evaluation of Failure Mechanisms and Retrofitting of Connections in Mass Timber Buildings. KSCE J Civ Eng 27, 3019–3035 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1737-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1737-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation