Abstract
In conventional buffeting analyses of flexible civil engineering structures, the differences between the effects of longitudinal (u-) and vertical (w-) turbulence components were usually ignored. This assumption could cause unpredictable errors and needs to be refined. To improve the accuracy of buffeting analyses, this paper proposes a framework combining Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation and wind tunnel test to analyze the buffeting forces considering the differences between turbulence components. First, the Aerodynamic Admittance Functions (AAFs) with respect to u- and w- turbulence are numerically evaluated. Next, the total buffeting forces are experimentally measured. Finally, the numerical and experimental results are combined following a theoretical scheme to separate the effects of u- and w-turbulence. Results show that u- and w- turbulence have different contributions to the buffeting forces, directly indicating the inaccuracy of the conventional assumption. In the turbulence field investigated, the buffeting lift force at zero angle of attack (AoA) are all contributed from the w-turbulence, while the contribution from u-turbulence increase as AoA increases. This numerical-experimental framework overcomes the limitations of the conventional method by quantitatively describing the different contributions of u- and w- turbulence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruno L, Salvetti MV, Ricciardelli F (2014) Benchmark on the Aerodynamics of a Rectangular 5:1 Cylinder: An overview after the first four years of activity. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 126:87–106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.01.005
Bruno L, Salvetti MV, Ricciardelli F (2017) Benchmark on the aerodynamics of a rectangular 5:1 cylinder, ERCOFTAC (European Research Community on Flow, Turbulence and Combustion) QNET-CFD Knowledge Base Wiki, Retrieved August 17, 2019, http://www.kbwiki.ercoftac.org/w/index.php/Abstr:UFR_2-15
Chen ZQ, Han Y, Hua XG, Luo YZ (2009) Investigation on influence factors of buffeting response of bridges and its aeroelastic model verification for Xiaoguan Bridge. Engineering Structures 31:417–431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.016
Cheynet E, Jakobsen JB, Snæbjörnsson J (2016) Buffeting response of a suspension bridge in complex terrain. Engineering Structures 128:474–487, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.060
Cigada A, Diana G, Zappa E (2002) On the response of a bridge deck to turbulent wind: A new approach. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 90:1173–1182, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00230-1
Davenport AG (1962) Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds. Journal of Structural Division 88(3):233–270, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0000773
Diana G, Bruni S, Cigada A, Zappa E (2002) Complex aerodynamic admittance function role in buffeting response of a bridge deck. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 90:2057–2072, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00321-5
Drabble MJ, Grant I, Armstrong BJ, Barnes FH (1990) The aerodynamic admittance of a square plate in a flow with a fully coherent fluctuation. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 2(6):1005–1013, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857638
Greenberg JM (1947) Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream. NACA Technical Report No. 1326, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Lab, Langley Field, VA, USA
Horlock JH (1968) Fluctuating lift forces on aerofoils moving through transverse and chordwise gusts. Journal of Basic Engineering 90:494, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3605173
Jakobsen JB (1997) Span-wise structure of lift and overturning moment on a motionless bridge girder. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 69–71:795–805, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00206-7
Jiang Y, Hui Y, Wang Y, Peng LL, Liu SY (2023) A novel eigenvalue-based iterative simulation method for multi-dimensional homogeneous non-Gaussian stochastic vector fields. Structural Safety 100:102290, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102290
Kavrakov I, Argentini T, Omarini S, Rocchi D, Morgenthal G (2019) Determination of complex aerodynamic admittance of bridge decks under deterministic gusts using the Vortex Particle Method. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 193:103971, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103971
Kawatani M, Kim H (1992) Evaluation of aerodynamic admittance for buffeting analysis. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 41:613–624, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90470-U
Larose GL, Livesey FM (1997) Performance of streamlined bridge decks in relation to the aerodynamics of a flat plate. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 69–71:851–860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00211-0
Li SP, Li MS, Larose GL (2018b) Aerodynamic admittance of streamlined bridge decks. Journal of Fluids and Structures 78:1–23, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.12.014
Li M, Li MS, Zhong YZ, Luo, N (2019) Buffeting response evaluation of long-span bridges with emphasis on the three-dimensional effects of gusty winds. Journal of Sound and Vibration 439:156–172, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.09.057
Li WL, Patruno L, Niu HW, Miranda S, Hua XG (2021) Identification of complex admittance functions using 2D-URANS models: Inflow generation and validation on rectangular cylinders. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 208:104435, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104435
Li SJ, Xin JZ, Jiang Y, Wang CW, Zhou JT, Yang XY (2023) Temperature-induced deflection separation based on bridge deflection data using the TVFEMD-PE-KLD method. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00679-4
Li HH, Zhang LL, Wu B, Yang Y, Xiao Z (2022) Investigation of the 2D aerodynamic admittances of a closed-box girder in sinusoidal flow field. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 26(3):1267–1281, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0610-z
Liepmann HW (1952) On the application of statistical concepts to buffeting problem. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 19:793–800, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2491
Ma TT, Zhao L, Cao SY, Ge YJ, Miyagi H (2013) Investigations of aerodynamic effects on streamlined box girder using two-dimensional actively-controlled oncoming flow. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 122:118–129, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.011
Rasmussen J, Hejlesen M, Larsen A, Walther JH (2010) Discrete vortex method simulations of the aerodynamic admittance in bridge aerodynamics. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 98:754–766, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.011
Scanlan RH (1978) The action of flexible bridges under wind II: Buffeting theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration 60:201–211, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80029-7
Sears WR (1941) Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 8(3):104–108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10655
Theodorsen T (1935) General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA technical report No. 496, National advisory committee for aeronautics, langley aeronautical lab, langley field, VA, USA
Vickery BJ (1965) On the flow behind a coarse grid and its use as a model of an atmospheric turbulence in studies related to wind loads on building. NPL aerodynamic report No. 1143, Aerodynamics division of the national physical laboratory, Teddington, London, UK
Wu FB, Huang GQ (2019) Refined empirical model of typhoon wind field and its application in China, Journal of Structural Engineering 145(11):04019122, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002422
Wu B, Li SP, Li K, Zhang LL (2020) Numerical and experimental studies on the aerodynamics of a 5:1 rectangular cylinder at angles of attack. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 199:104097, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104097
Wu B, Li S, Zhang LL, Li K (2021) Experimental determination of the two-dimensional aerodynamic admittances of a 5:1 rectangular cylinder in streamwise sinusoidal flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 210:104525, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104525
Wu B, Zhou JT, Li SP, Xin JZ, Zhang H, Yang XY (2022) Combining active and passive wind tunnel tests to determine the aerodynamic admittances of a bridge girder. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 231:105180, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105180
Xin JZ, Jiang Y, Zhou JT, Peng LL, Liu SY, Tang QZ (2022) Bridge deformation prediction based on SHM data using improved VMD and conditional KDE. Engineering Structures 261:114285, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114285
Yang J, Chen R, Zhang Z, Zou Y, Zhou J, Xia J (2023). Experimental study on the ultimate bearing capacity of damaged RC arches strengthened with ultra-high performance concrete. Engineering Structures 279: 115611, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115611
Yang Y, Li MS, Ma CM, Li SP (2017) Experimental investigation on the unsteady lift of an airfoil in a sinusoidal streamwise gust. Physics of Fluids 29:051703, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984243
Yao G, Yang Y, Wu B, Liu LJ, Zhang LL (2019) Aerodynamic admittance influence on buffeting performance of suspension bridge with streamlined deck. Journal of Vibroengineering 21(1):198–214, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2018.19681
Zhang H, Li HX, Zhou JT, Tong K, Xia RC (2023a) A multi-dimensional evaluation of wire breakage in bridge cable based on self-magnetic flux leakage signals. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 566:170321, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170321
Zhang H, Ma XT, Jiang HJ, Tong K, Zheng Y, Zhou JT (2023b) Grading evaluation of overall corrosion degree of corroded RC beams via SMFL technique. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2023: 6672823, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6672823
Acknowledgments
This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52108435), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (Grant No. cstc2021jcyj-bshX0061), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2022MD713699), and the Special Funding of Chongqing Postdoctoral Research Project (Grant No. 2021XM1016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, B., Zhou, J., Xin, J. et al. A Numerical-Experimental Framework to Separate the Effects of Different Turbulence Components on the Buffeting Forces of Bluff-body Structures. KSCE J Civ Eng 27, 3386–3402 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0675-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0675-y