Abstract
This study aims to develop a decision-making support system for managing aged road facilities in a target road network based on seismic performance evaluation. For this purpose, the seismic fragility considering aging effect is analyzed for bridges, tunnels, retaining walls, and slopes to assess the direct damage to individual road facilities, as described in the companion paper. In this paper, based on the seismic fragilities of road facilities, the degradation of the road network’s seismic performance and social and economic resilience is evaluated. The decision support system is then developed based on the seismic risk assessment method (SRA) for the seismic management of old road facilities suitable for domestic conditions. The SRA method includes the calculation of direct and indirect damage of road networks, the assessment of socio-economic resilience to disaster in South Korea, and the basis for decision-making. In addition, a geospatial information-based software for repair and reinforcement decisions is developed. The developed decision-making support software is verified by using Pohang city located in the East part of Korea as a test-bed example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson NA, Youngs RR (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 82(1):505–510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0820010505
Akin O, Sahin M (2017) Active neuro-adaptive vibration suppression of a smart beam. Smart Structures and Systems 20(6):657–668, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.6.657
Aomar RA (2010) A combined ahp-entropy method for deriving subjective and objective criteria weights. International Journal of Industrial Eng.: Theory, Applications and Practice 17(1):17–24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.23055/ijietap.2010.17.1.330
Baker JW (2008) An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). White Paper, version 1:72
Banerjee S, Vishwanath BS, Devendiran DK (2019) Multihazard resilience of highway bridges and bridge networks: A review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 15(12):1694–1714
Boost (2008) The Boost Graph Library. https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0/libs/graph/doc/index.html
Chen M, Mangalathu S, Jeon JS (2022) Machine learning-based seismic reliability assessment of bridge networks. Journal of Structural Engineering 148(7):06022002
Chen M, Mangalathu S, Jeon JS (2023) Betweenness centrality-based seismic risk management for bridge transportation networks. Engineering Structures 289:116301
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society ofAmerica 58(5):1583–1606, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583
Cornell CA, Banon H, Shakal AF (1979) Seismic motion and response prediction alternatives. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 7(4):295–315, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290070402
Du L, Peeta S (2014) A stochastic optimization model to reduce expected post-disaster response time through pre-disaster investment decisions. Networks and Spatial Economics 14(2):271–295, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9219-1
FEMA (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model. Department of Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness and Response
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2006) Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures. No. FHWA-HRT-06–032, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
Gleich D (2008) MATLAB BGL, MATLAB Central. 2008, https://kr.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/10922-matlabbgl
Goda K, Hong H-P (2008) Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98(1):354–365, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070078
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 34(4):185–188, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1993) Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 83(2): 469–487, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0830020469
Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety (KALIS) (2011) Guide line for seismic performance evaluation and improvement of existing facilities. No 11-B552016-000009–01, Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety, Korea
Kang WH, Song J, Gardoni P (2008) Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93(11):1584–1593
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education India
Lee SH, Kang JE, Bae HJ, Yoon DK (2015) Vulnerability assessment of the air pollution using entropy weights: Focused on ozone. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers 21(4):751–763
Lee D, Song J (2021) Multi-scale seismic reliability assessment of networks by centrality-based selective recursive decomposition algorithm. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 50(8):2174–2194, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3447
Lee D, Song J (2023) Risk-informed operation and maintenance of complex lifeline systems using parallelized multi-agent deep Q-network. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 239:109512, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109512
Lim HW, Song J (2012) Efficient risk assessment of lifeline networks under spatially correlated ground motions using selective recursive decomposition algorithm. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41(13):1861–1882, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2162
Mackie K, Stojadinovic B (2006) Post-earthquake functionality of highway overpass bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(1):77–93, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.534
Nguyen DH, Bui TT, De Roeck G, Wahab MA (2019) Damage detection in Ca-Non Bridge using transmissibility and artificial neural networks. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 71(2):175–183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.71.2.175
Nyimbili PH, Erden T (2020) A hybrid approach integrating Entropy-AHP and GIS for suitability assessment of urban emergency facilities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9(7):419, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070419
NYSDOT (New York State Department of Transportation) (2004) Bridge Safety Assurance Seismic Vulnerability Manual, New York State Department of Transportation, NY
Onat O, Gul M (2018) Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of out-of-plane response of infill walls subjected to shake table. Smart Structures and Systems 21(4):521–535, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.4.521
Rizzo P, Lanza di Scalea F (2006) Wavelet-based feature extraction for automatic defect classification in strands by ultrasonic structural monitoring. Smart Structures and Systems 2(3):253–274, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2006.2.3.253
Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9(3–5):161–176, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Seo H, Kim J, Kim B (2022) Machine-learning-based surface ground-motion prediction models for South Korea with low-to-moderate seismicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 112(3):1549–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210244
Sextos AG, Kilanitis I, Kyriakou K, Kappos AJ (2017) Resilience of road networks to earthquakes. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
Sianko I, Ozdemir Z, Khoshkholghi S, Garcia R, Hajirasouliha I, Yazgan U, Pilakoutas K (2020) A practical probabilistic earthquake hazard analysis tool: Case study Marmara region. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18:2523–2555
Sohn J, Kim TJ, Hewings GJ, Lee JS, Jang SG (2003) Retrofit priority of transport network links under an earthquake. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 129(4):195–210, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2003)129:4(195)
Sokolov V, Wenzel F, Jean W-Y, Wen K-L (2010) Un-certainty and spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion in Taiwan, Terrestrial. Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences 21(6):905–921
Tak H-Y, Suh W, Lee Y-J (2019) System-level seismic risk assessment of bridge transportation networks employing probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6503616
Yoon S, Kim J, Kim M, Tak H-Y, Lee Y-J (2020) Accelerated system-level seismic risk assessment of bridge transportation networks through artificial neural network-based surrogate model. Applied Sciences 10(18):6476, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186476
Yoon S, Suh W, Lee Y-J (2021) Optimal decision making in post-hazard bridge recovery strategies for transportation networks after seismic events. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 12(1):2629–2653, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1961881
Zardari NH, Ahmed K, Shirazi SM, Yusop ZB Zardari NH, Ahmed K, Shirazi SM, Yusop ZB (2015) Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcome in water resources management. USA: Springer Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant (21SCIP-B146946-04) from Smart Civil Infrastructure Research Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government. The authors also would like to appreciate the contributions of Kwon Oh-Sung, Jong-Han Lee, Seong-Hoon Jeong, Jong-Keol Song, Jinsup Kim, Byung Ho Choi and Seungjun Kim to finalize this paper. The author Junho Song appreciates the support by the Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering at Seoul National University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D., Song, J., Lee, YJ. et al. Seismic Performance Management of Aging Road Facilities in Korea: Part 2 − Decision-making Support Technology and Its Application. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 1889–1902 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0601-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0601-3