Abstract
A gap formation underneath pipelines could be observed during tunneling beneath existing buried pipelines, thus altering the pipeline-soil interaction behavior. However, the most existing analytical approaches typically do a full contact assumption for brevity. For such purpose, we aim to present an analytical approach coupling the effect of gap formation underneath pipelines by considering the buried pipeline as an Euler-Bernoulli beam on tensionless foundation. The pipeline can be divided into three segments according to pipeline-soil interaction behavior, and then the bending behaviors of each segment are formulated. The deflection and bending moment of the pipeline caused by tunnelling underneath from the proposed approach are compared and validated with centrifuge testing data and existing analytical solutions. The effects of pipeline-soil stiffness ratio, pipeline buried depth, tunnel buried depth, tunneling induced volume loss, and tunnel-pipeline intersection angle on the pipeline responses are further discussed. The results indicate that gap formation underneath pipeline can be observed indeed for shallowly buried pipeline and/or larger pipeline-soil stiffness ratio. The proposed analytical approach provides a theoretical guideline to predict the responses of existing pipelines to tunnelling underneath.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attewell PB, Yeates J, Selby AR (1986) Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures. London: Blackie & Son
Fang Q, Zhang DL, Li QQ, Wong, LNY (2015) Effects of twin tunnels construction beneath existing shield-driven twin tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 45:128–137, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.10.001
Fargnoli V, Gragnano GC, Boldini D, Amorosi A (2015) 3D numerical modelling of soil-structure interaction during EPB tunneling. Géotechnique 62:23–37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.091
Huang MS, Zhou XC, Yu J, Leung CF, Tan JQW (2019) Estimating the effects of tunnelling on existing jointed pipelines based on Winkler model. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 86:89–99, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.015
Jin DL, Yuan DJ, Li XG, Zheng HT (2018) Analysis of the settlement of an existing tunnel induced by shield tunnelling underneath. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 81:209–220, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.035
Klar A, Elkayam I, Marshall AM (2016) Design oriented linear-equivalent approach for evaluating the effect of tunnelling on pipelines. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142:04015062, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001376
Klar A, Marshall AM (2008) Shell versus beam representation of pipes in the evaluation of tunneling effects on pipelines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 23:431–437, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.003
Klar A, Marshall AM, Soga K, Mair RJ (2008) Tunnelling effects on jointed pipelines. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 45:131–139, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-068
Klar A, Vorster TEB, Soga K, Mair R J (2007) Elastoplastic solution for soil-pipe-tunnel interaction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133:782–792, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(782)
Klar A, Vorster TEB, Soga K, Mair RJ (2005) Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: Comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions. Géotechnique 55:461–466, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.461
Lai HP, Zheng HW, Chen R, Kang Z, Liu Y (2020) Settlement behaviors of existing tunnel caused by obliquely under-crossing shield tunnelling in close proximity with small intersection angle. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 97:103258, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103258
Li PS, Du J, Shen SL, Wang YH, Zhao HH (2016) Timoshenko beam solution for the response of existing tunnels because of tunneling underneath. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 40:766–84, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2426
Lin CG, Huang MS (2019) Tunnelling-induced response of a jointed pipeline and its equivalence to a continuous structure. Soils and Foundations 59:829–839, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.02.009
Lin CG, Huang MS, Nadim F, Liu ZQ (2020) Tunnelling-induced response of buried pipelines and their effects on ground settlements. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 96:103193, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103193
Liu X, Jiang AN, Lu H, Wan YS, Li JY (2021) Study on soil gap formation beneath existing underground structures due to new excavation below. Computers and Geotechnics 139:104379, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104379
Ma SK, Shao Y, Liu Y, Jiang J, Fan XL (2017) Responses of pipeline to side-by-side twin tunnelling at different depths: 3D centrifuge tests and numerical modelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 66:157–173, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.04.006
Marshall A, Farrell R, Klar A, Mair R (2012) Tunnels in sands: The effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements. Géotechnique 62:385–399, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.047
Marshall AM, Klar A, Mair RJ (2010) Tunnelling beneath buried pipes: View of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136:1664–1672, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000390
Mindlin RD (1936) Force at a point in the interior of a semi-infinite solid. Physics 7:195–202, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745385
Ng CWW, Boonyarak T, Masin D (2013) Three-dimensional centrifuge and numerical modeling of the interaction between perpendicularly crossing tunnels. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 50(9):935–946, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0445
Shi JW, Wang Y, Ng C WW (2016) Three-dimensional centrifuge modeling of ground and pipeline response to tunnel excavation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142: 04016054, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001529
Vesic AB (1961) Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division 87:35–53, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000212
Vorster TEB, Klar A, Soga K, Mair RJ (2005) Estimating the effects of tunnelling on existing pipelines. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131:1399–1410, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1399)
Wang F, Du YJ, Yang X (2015) Physical modeling on ground responses to tunnelling in sand considering the existence of hdpe pipes. Geotechnical Testing Journal 38:85–97, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140031
Wang Y, Shi JW, Ng CWW (2011) Numerical modeling of tunnelling effect on buried pipelines. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 48:1125–1137, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-024
Xu JM, Franza A, Marshall AM, Losacco N, Boldini D (2021) Tunnel-framed building interaction: Comparison between raft and separate footing foundations. Géotechnique 71:631–644, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.393
Yu J, Zhang CR, Huang MS (2013) Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: Assessment of Winkler modulus for underground pipelines. Computers and Geotechnics 50:17–28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.005
Zhang BQ, Chen FQ, Wang QY, Lin LB (2020) Analytical model of buried beams on a tensionless foundation subjected to differential settlement. Applied Mathematical Modelling 87:269–286, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.s2020.06.004
Zhang CR, Yu J, Huang MS (2012) Effects of tunnelling on existing pipelines in layered soils. Computers and Geotechnics 43:12–25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.01.011
Zheng H, Li P, Ma G (2021) Stability analysis of the middle soil pillar for asymmetric parallel tunnels by using model testing and numerical simulations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 108: 103686, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103686
Acknowledgments
This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177121), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province (2020J01882), Plan project of Fuzhou Science and Technology Bureau (2019-G-38), and Development Fund Project of Fujian university of Technology (GY-Z18170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Bq., Chen, Qw., Lai, Fw. et al. Responses of Buried Pipelines to Tunnelling Underneath Considering Effect of Gap Formation: An Analytical Approach. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 386–395 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0177-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0177-y