Abstract
Accurately detecting the location of the goafs is an effective method for coordinating underground mining and surface engineering construction and realizing illegal mining supervision. Aiming at the problems of the existing solution methods of goaf spatial characteristic parameters, a spatial location identification method of coal underground goaf with fusing minimal unit probability integration method and optimized quantum annealing is proposed. Meanwhile, to study the characteristics and stability of the proposed model, the advantages and disadvantages of space movement vector data, the robust ability of the method, and the application of multi-source data are discussed in the Discussions. Finally, the achievements of this paper apply to 1414 (1) working face of Gubei Coal Mine in Huainan. The results show the model can accurately identify the location and boundary of the goaf. The research achievements have important theoretical and practical significance for solving problems of land resource reuse in mining areas lacking geological mining data, coal mine safety production, and the supervision of illegal mining.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Garni MA, El-Kaliouby HM (2011) Delineation of saline groundwater and sea water intrusion zones using transient electromagnetic (TEM) method, Wadi Thuwal area, Saudi Arabia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 4(3–4):655–668, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0094-5
Balkaya C, Gokturkler G, Erhan Z, Ekinci YL (2012) Exploration for a cave by magnetic and electrical resistivity surveys: Ayvacik sinkhole example, Bozdag, Izmir (western Turkey). Geophysics 77(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0290.1
Batayneh AT, Abueladas AA, Moumani KA (2002) Use of ground-penetrating radar for assessment of potential sinkhole conditions: An example from Ghor al Haditha area, Jordan. Environmental Geology 41(8):977–983, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-001-0477-8
Bharti AK, Pal SK, Priyam P, Pathak VK, Kumar R, Ranjan SK (2016) Detection of illegal mine voids using electrical resistivity tomography: The case-study of Raniganj coalfield (India). Engineering Geology 213:120–132, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.004
Bishop I, Styles P, Emsley SJ, Ferguson NS (1997) The detection of cavities using the microgravity technique: Case histories from mining and karstic environments. Geological Society London Engineering Geology Special Publications 12(1):153–166, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.ENG.1997.012.01.13
Dai HY, Wang JZ, Cui JX, Cai MF (2001) Propagation angle and maximum subsidence angle of mining influence based on change of dip. Mine Surveying 2001:28–30 (in Chinese)
Gochioco LM, Gochioco JR, Ruev F (2012) Coal geophysics expands with growing global demands for mine safety and productivity. Leading Edge 31(3):308–314, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3694898
Hajnal Z, Takács E, Annesley IR, Pandit B (2020) Effective utilization of seismic reflection technique with moderate cost in uranium exploration. Geophysical Prospecting 68:129–144, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12904
Jiang C, Wang L, Wei T, Chi SS, Fang SY, Guo QB (2018) Identification method of the goaf’s parameters in Guqiao mine based on pattern search method. Metal Mine (8):123–126 (in Chinese)
Jorgensen F, Sandersen PBE, Auken E (2003) Imaging buried quaternary valleys using the transient electromagnetic method. Journal Applied Geophysics 53(4):199–213, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.08.016
Kies A, Storoni A, Tosheva, Z, Hofman H (2006) Radon measurements as a monitoring possibility for mining subsidence occurrence. Journal of Mining Science 42(5):518–522, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-006-0082-z
Li PX, Wan HM, Xu Y, Yuan XQ, Zhao YP (2018) Parameter inversion of probability integration method using surface movement vector. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 40(4):767–776, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE201804022 (in Chinese)
Martínez-Pagán P, Gómez-Ortiz D, Martín-Crespo T, Manteca JI, Rosique M (2013) The electrical resistivity tomography method in the detection of shallow mining cavities. A case study on the Victoria Cave, Cartagena (SE Spain). Engineering Geology 156:1–10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.01.013
Martonák R, Santoro GE, Tosatti E (2004) Quantum annealing of the traveling-salesman problem. Physical Review E 70(5):057701, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.057701
Morita S, Nishimori H (2008) Mathematical foundation of quantum annealing. Journal of Mathematical Physics 49(12):106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2995837
Park B, Kim J, Lee J, Kang MS, An YK (2018) Underground object classification for urban roads using instantaneous phase analysis of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data. Remote Sensing 10(9), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091417
Rodriguez V, Gutierrez F, Green AG, Carbonel D, Horstmeyer H, Schmelzbach C (2014) Characterizing sagging and collapse sinkholes in a mantled karst by means of ground penetrating radar (GPR). Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 20(2):109–132, DOI:https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.20.2.109
Saatçilar R, İnan S, Cankurtaranlar A, Duygun F, Demirbağ E, Ergintav S, Yilmaz M, Toygar AR, Kosebalaban A, Yalçın MN (2014) An environmentally-friendly integrated seismic imaging for coal exploration in the Miocene Soma Basin, Western Turkey. International Journal of Oil Gas & Coal Technology 7(4):399–414, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2014.062171
Saddek B, Chemseddine F, Djamel B, Nabil B (2019) Surface and subsurface investigations for the detection and mapping of underground karst cav. Journal of the Geological Society of India 93(2):228–234, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-019-1157-1
State Administration of Work Safety (2017) Regulations on mining under buildings, water bodies and railways and coal safety pillars in main roadway. China Coal Industry Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese)
Wang L, Li N, Zhang XN, Wei T, Chen YF, Zha JF (2018a) Full parameters inversion model for mining subsidence prediction using simulated annealing based on single line of sight D-InSAR. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(5):1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7355-0
Wang L, Wei T, Li N, Chi SS, Jiang C, Fang SY (2018b) Research on probability integration parameter inversion of mining-induced surface subsidence based on quantum annealing. Environmental Earth Sciences 77(21), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7927-z
Wang YP, Zhao DS (2016) Numerical analysis of the influence of seepage on the displacement law of different overburden strata. Proceedings of the 2015 2nd international forum on electrical engineering and automation (IFEEA 2015), December 26–27, Guangzhou, China, 218–222
Wei C, Zhu PM, Wang JY (2006) Quantum annealing inversion and its implementation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics 49(2):577–583, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.02.034 (in Chinese)
Wu K, Ge JX, Wang LD, Zhou M (1998) Integrated method of mining subsidence prediction. China University Mining Technology Press, Xuzhou, China (in Chinese)
Wu ZY, Niu QH, Li WP, Lin NH, Liu SL (2018) Ground stability evaluation of a coal-mining area: A case study of Yingshouyingzi mining area, China. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 15(5):2252–2265, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2140/aac991
Yang ZF, Li ZW, Zhu JJ, Peng HW, Hu J, Wu LX, Preusse A, Wang YJ, Papst M (2018) Locating and defining underground goaf caused by coal mining from space-borne SAR interferometry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 135:112–126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.020
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the [National Natural Science Foundation of China] under Grant [51974292, 51804301, 52074010]; and [Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province] under Grant [KYCX21_2294].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, T., Guo, G., Li, H. et al. Fusing Minimal Unit Probability Integration Method and Optimized Quantum Annealing for Spatial Location of Coal Goafs. KSCE J Civ Eng 26, 2381–2391 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-1034-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-1034-0