Skip to main content
Log in

Research on Determining Resource Utilization Rates of Regional Construction and Demolition Waste from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

How to achieve diversified and cooperative management of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) has always been a difficult problem for the government and the public. To achieve collaborative governance, it is necessary to coordinate the conflicting interests among multiple subjects and reasonably determine the collaborative goals. This study aims to illustrate the necessity and feasibility of collaborative governance, determine the phased resource utilization rate target from the perspective of balance of interests, and design a dynamic adjustment mechanism for local government’s collaborative governance target, regional C&DW resource utilization rate and rewards and punishments from a quantitative perspective. From the perspective of maximizing social benefits and balancing the interests shared by three stakeholders: construction and demolition enterprises, waste resource treatment enterprises and the government, the system dynamics (SD) and multi-objective planning (MOP) coupling model (SD-MOP) are constructed. The MOP model is used to solve the optimal solution that satisfactory to all parties, and the SD model simulates the internal and external environmental changes of the C&DW management system under the optimal solution to provide dynamic parameters for the MOP model. This paper takes Jiangbei New Area in Nanjing, China as an example to verify the validity of the proposed SD-MOP model. The calculation results show that the three stakeholders with relevant interests can achieve a win-win situation by integrating resources and optimizing resource allocation, while promoting the goal of collaborative governance, that is, improving the utilization rate of C&DW resource utilization. In addition, the model also gives the specific time for the establishment and realization of the phased target of resource utilization in Nanjing Jiangbei New Area, with resource utilization rate targets of 75%, 79% and 84% in 2024, 2029 and 2036, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagriacik B (2021) Utilization of alkali-activated construction demolition waste for sandy soil improvement with large-scale laboratory experiments. Construction and Building Materials 302, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124173

  • Bagriacik B (2022) Large scale laboratory investigation in the improvement of subgrade characteristics of clay soil stabilized with construction demolition waste. Journal of Engineering Research 10(1B): 55–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.10445

    Google Scholar 

  • Bha B, Xw A, Hk C, Yong G, Rb F, Jr G (2018) Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 12936(44), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029

  • Blaisi NI (2019) Construction and demolition waste management in saudi arabia: Current practice and roadmap for sustainable management. Journal of Cleaner Production 221(1): 167–175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S (2021) Research on the multiple collaborative governance of the urban construction waste resources. Adhesion 45(1): 171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristelo N, Fernandez-Jimenez A, Vieira C, Miranda T, Palomo A (2018) Stabilisation of construction and demolition waste with a high fines content using alkali activated fly ash. Construction and Building Materials 170: 26–39, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Rossi A, Ribeiro MJ, Labrincha JA, Novais RM, Hotza D, Moreira RFPM (2019) Effect of the particle size range of construction and demolition waste on the fresh and hardened-state properties of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars with total replacement of sand. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 129: 130–137, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmyter J, Vrijders J, Boehme L (2010) Recycling of C&D waste in belgium: Ongoing research and relevant developments. Paper Presented at the Conference on Central Europe towards Sustainable Building, Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Du L, Feng Y, Lu W, Kong L, Yang Z (2020) Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholders’ decision-making behaviours in construction and demolition waste management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 84106408, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.10640

  • Gan Y (2021) Research on using urban construction waste as resources in light of collaborative governance—taking qingxiu district of nanning city as an example. Guangxi University

  • He L, Yuan H (2020) Investigation of construction waste recycling decisions by considering consumers’ quality perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production 259120928, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120928

  • Jh A, Hy B, Jing LC, Csc A, Wl D (2019) A model for assessing the economic performance of construction waste reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production 232427–440, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.348

  • Jia S, Yan Ģ Shen A, Zheng J (2017) Dynamic simulation analysis of a construction and demolition waste management model under penalty and subsidy mechanisms. Journal of Cleaner Production 147(3): 531–545, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin M (2021) Research on economic benefit of recycling construction waste enterprises — Based on the analysis of different economic incentive policies. Xian University of Architecture and Technology

  • Liu H, Long H, Li X (2020) Identification of critical factors in construction and demolition waste recycling by the grey-DEMATEL approach: A Chinese perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(8): 8507–8525, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07498-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Nie J, Yuan H (2020) Interactive decisions of the waste producer and the recycler in construction waste recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production 256120403, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120403

  • Liu J, Teng Y, Wang D, Gong E (2020) System dynamic analysis of construction waste recycling industry chain in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06739-x

  • Ma M (2019) Research on the multiple cooperative governance of urban construction waste recycling — A Case Study of Xi’an City. Chang’an University

  • Ma L, Zhang L (2020) Evolutionary game analysis of construction waste recycling management in China. Resources Conservation and Recycling 161104863, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104863

  • Negash YT, Hassan AM, Tseng ML, Wu KJ, Ali MH (2021) Sustainable construction and demolition waste management in somaliland: Regulatory barriers lead to technical and environmental barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production 4126717, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126717

  • Su Y (2020) Multi-agent evolutionary game in the recycling utilization of construction waste. Science of The Total Environment 738(7649): 139826, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su P, Peng Y, Hu Q, Tan R (2020) Incentive mechanism and subsidy design for construction and demolition waste recycling under information asymmetry with reciprocal behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(12): 43–46, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Yue Y, Xiahou X, Tang S, Li Q (2021) Research on performance measurement and simulation of civil air defense PPP projects using system dynamics. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 27(5): 316–330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.14919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirkolaee BT, Aydin NS (2021) A sustainable medical waste collection and transportation model for pandemics. Waste Management & Research 39(1): 34–44, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x211000437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirkolaee EB, Goli A, Gütmen S, Weber G-W, Szwedzka K (2022) A novel model for sustainable waste collection arc routing problem: Pareto-based algorithms. Annals of Operations Research, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04486-2

  • Torkayesh AE, Vandchali HR, Tirkolaee EB (2021) Multi-objective optimization for healthcare waste management network design with sustainability perspective. Smtainability 13(15): 8279, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Kang Y, Song S (2019) Study on optimal allocation of water resources in ecological irrigation district based on SD-MOP model. Water Saving Irrigation 8: 68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijewickrama M, Chileshe N, Rameezdeen R, Ochoa JJ (2020) Information sharing in reverse logistics supply chain of demolition waste: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 280(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124359

  • Yang L, Zhou Z, Meng C (2013) Getting out of the dilemma of construction waste management — based on the multi-cooperative governance mechanism. Herum Social Sciences 21(9): 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • You Z, Wu C, Zheng L, Feng L (2020) An informatization scheme for construction and demolition waste supervision and management in China. Sustainability 12(4): 16–72, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan HP, Shen LY, Hao J, Lu WS (2011) A model for cost–benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain. Resources Conservation and Recycling 55(6): 604–612, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Ju Y, Gonzalez E, Wang A, Giannakis M (2021) Evaluation of construction and demolition waste utilization schemes under uncertain environment: A fuzzy heterogeneous multi-criteria decision-making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 313(7): 127907, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Zhao T, Zhang Z, Zhou A (2017) Dynamic pricing of wastewater treatment with PPP by the coupled SD-MOP model. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 34(1): 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X (2021) Stakeholder-associated factors influencing construction and demolition waste management: A systematic review. Buildings 11(4): 149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Nanjing Jiangbei New Area Research Plan in Construction Field [2018] N0.113.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingyi Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, L., Zhang, Z. & Tang, L. Research on Determining Resource Utilization Rates of Regional Construction and Demolition Waste from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance. KSCE J Civ Eng 27, 27–39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-0465-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-0465-y

Keywords

Navigation