Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing Multimodal Public-Private Partnerships: The State of the Practice in the U.S.

  • Transportation Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Multimodal public-private partnership (MP3) projects denote transportation investments that serve two or more modes and include substantial private sector involvement. Because non-auto modes often require an operational subsidy, MP3s can be rare; thus, implementation of such projects is of interest. This study reports on the results of interviews regarding U.S. agencies’ pursuit of 23 candidate MP3 projects. For example, when a decision is made to pursue a multimodal project as a P3, the reason is frequently to obtain private financing. Other reasons are construction speed, expertise in specific areas such as land development, and an enhanced ability to relate monies paid to the quality of transit provided. Further, when transportation modes are being added to a P3 project, revenue is a reason for only a minority of projects: other reasons included multiple modes being a part of the region’s long-term vision, public opinion, and the project being inherently multimodal (e.g., redevelopment of an area supporting rental car parking and commuter rail). In most decisions regarding MP3s, land impacts are considered to some degree, but the reasons vary: no expected impact, more intense development in a particular location, impacts near the facility but no exact location pinpointed, and increased real estate values. The conditions supporting an MP3 are diverse and include the implementation of a region’s long-term vision, public pressure, and a unique opportunity to bring together stakeholders to create a project that was otherwise infeasible or to solve a specific problem. Accordingly, as reported in this study, their diverse nature means that MP3s can be considered at multiple decision points in the project development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AECOM Consult, Inc (2005) Synthesis of public-private partnership projects for roads, bridges and tunnels from around the world, 1985–2004. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • AECOM Consult, Inc (2007) User guidebook on implementing public-private partnerships for transportation infrastructure projects in the United States. Work Order 05–002, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaska Channel (2020) Whittier tunnel: Anton anderson memorial tunnel. Alaska Channel, Retrieved October 19, 2020, https://www.alaska.org/detail/whittier-tunnel

  • Ankner WD (2008) Road pricing, tolling, mega-projects, and other multi-modal opportunities: Strategically positioning public transportation. American Public Transportation Association, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold R, Ankner WD, DeCorla-Souza P (2012) Generating revenue to fund public-private partnerships for reconstruction of freeway systems in metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2297:112–120, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2297-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlanta BeltLine, Inc (2010) Master plan, subarea 1: Plan recommendations report. Atlanta, GA, USA

  • Center for Transportation Public-Private Partnership Policy (2014) Public-private partnerships case studies. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • City Centre Warwick (2015) Master plan. City Centre Warwick, Warwick, RI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Atlanta (2013) Press release: Mayor Kasim Reed commits to continuing public/private investments for the Atlanta BeltLine. City of Atlanta, Retrieved May 10, 2019, https://www.atlantaga.gov/Home/Components/News/News/2031/672?npage=60&arch=1

  • DC. gov (2015) Mayor bowser launches office of public-private partnerships with key leadership announcements. DC. Gov, Retrieved May 10, 2019, http://mayor.dc.gov/release/mayor-bowser-launches-office-public-private-partnerships-key-leadership-announcements

  • DC. gov (2016) Office of public-private partnerships. DC. Gov, Retrieved April 10, 2016, http://op3.dc.gov/

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2018) Number of 2012 population density (pop per Square Mile). Atlas Publisher, Redlands, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Transit Administration (2014) Record of decision: Purple line project, Montgomery county and Prince George’s county, Maryland. U.S. Department of Transportation, Retrieved November 10, 2015, http://www.purplelinemd.com/en/about-the-project/studies-reports/record-of-decision

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2007) Case studies of transportation public-private partnerships in the United States. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2010) Public-private partnership concessions for highway projects: A primer. Publication FHWA-OIPD-10-005, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2014a) Innovative finance support: Project profiles: New build facilities. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2014b) 2010 status of the nation’s highways, bridges, and transit: Condition & performance. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery (2014) Public-private partnerships project profiles. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Retrieved February 10, 2014, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_profiles/

  • FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery (Undated a) P3 defined. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Retrieved November 10, 2015, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/defined/

  • FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery (Undated b) State P3 legislation. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Retrieved November 10, 2015, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/legislation/

  • Garber NJ, Hoel LA (2009) Traffic & highway engineering, 4th edition. Cengage Learning, Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Istrate E, Puentes R (2011) Moving forward on public private partnerships: U.S. and international experience with PPP units. Brookings Institution, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone E, Holmes N (2015) The growing distance between people and jobs in metropolitan America. Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2012) Five myths about the TIFIA credit program. Eno Center for Transportation, Retrieved November 10, 2014, https://www.enotrans.org/eno-brief/five-myths-about-the-tifia-credit-program

  • Maloof A (2014) P3 projects fill gaps in budget holes. Mass Transit, Retrieved May 16, 2019, https://www.masstransitmag.com/40-under-40/article/11231825/p3-projects-overcome-budget-cuts

  • Maryland Transit Administration (Undated) Economic development near the Purple line. Maryland Transit Administration, Retrieved November 10, 2015, http://www.purplelinemd.com/images/maps_graphics/Development%20Map2014%20final.pdf

  • Massachusetts Department of Transportation (2006) Project development & design guide. Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Maze ADL (2013) InfaPPP projects — Projects in USA. InfraPPP World SL., Retrieved August 3, 2013, http://infrapppworld.com/pipeline-html/projects-in-usa

  • Metro (2019) High desert corridor. Metro, Retrieved October 19, 2020, https://www.metro.net/projects/high-desert-corridor/

  • Meyer MD, Miller EJ (2013) Transportation planning: A decision-oriented approach, 3rd edition. Modern Transport Solutions, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols MC (2012) Value capture case studies: Denver’s historic Union Station. Metropolitan Planning Council, Retrieved May 16, 2019, https://www.metroplanning.org/news/6392/Value-Capture-Case-Studies-Denvers-Historic-Union-Station

  • O’Leary AA (2016) Email to Miller JS on August 17, 2016

  • Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships (2012) Public-private transportation act of 1995 (as amended) implementation manual and guidelines. Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships, Richmond, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships (2014) Candidate PPTA projects; PPTA projects under procurement; PPTA projects under construction; PPTA projects completed; Projects no longer under PPTA consideration. Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships, Richmond, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Works Financing (2015) U.S. P3 deal flow suffers from delays, attrition. Public Works Financing, Retrieved May 16, 2020, https://pwfinance.net/u-s-deal-flow-suffers-from-delays-attrition/

  • Rall J (2014) Public-private partnerships for transportation: A toolkit for legislators—February 2014 updates and corrections. National Conference of State Legislatures, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Transportation District (2014) Fastracks fact sheet. Regional Transportation District, Denver, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • The Louis Berger Group, Inc (2014) Sketch level I-70 mountain corridor traffic and revenue study. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation (2015) TIFIA credit program overview. U.S. Department of Transportation, Retrieved May 10, 2015, http://www.dot.gov/tifia/tifia-credit-program-overview

  • U.S. Department of Transportation (Undated) Projects financed by TIFIA. U.S. Department of Transportation, Retrieved October 10, 2015, http://www.transportation.gov/tifia/projects-financed

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research could not have been conducted without the assistance of staff who contributed time and expertise. Individuals who provided insights include Julie Adamson (Florida), Kwadwo Atta (Georgia), Angela Biney (Virginia), Loreen Bobo (Florida), Gordon Burton (Alaska), Derrick Cameron (Georgia), Oswaldo Chaves (Illinois), Jacqueline Cromwell (Virginia), Nate Cruz (Washington, D.C.), Stephen Devine (Rhode Island), Brittany Dyra (Illinois), James Edwards (Florida), Roger Driskell (Illinois), Nicholas Farber (Colorado), Richard Gehring (Florida), Robin Grier (Virginia), John Hancock (Georgia), Kalieh Honish (California), Eugene Kim (California), Jamie Lai (California), Paul Lampley (Florida), Ben Limmer (Georgia), Robert Machuca (California), Patrick McLaughlin (Colorado), Jodie Misiak (Maryland), Craig Newton (North Carolina), Frank O’Dea (Florida), Amy O’Leary (Virginia), Eliza Paul (Texas), Tim Pimental (Rhode Island), Randy Redmond (Texas), Ivan Rucker (Virginia), Greg Schiess (Florida), Jeffrey Sriver (Illinois), Eric Stringfield (Virginia), LaShunda Walker (Georgia), and Brian Welch (Colorado). Interviews were led by Roger Howe with assistance from Linda DeGrasse, PilJin Chun, Kayleigh Roy, and Thomas Hamed. Linda Evans provided editing. The findings of this work reflect solely the authors’ views and do not necessarily reflect the views of any agencies listed herein and the United Nations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changju Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, C., Miller, J.S. Implementing Multimodal Public-Private Partnerships: The State of the Practice in the U.S.. KSCE J Civ Eng 25, 2199–2212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0900-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0900-5

Keywords

Navigation