Skip to main content
Log in

Rig Load Prediction Model in Horizontal Directional Drilling within Water-Rich Unstable Strata

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

In horizontal directional drilling (HDD) construction, the rig pulling load is the load directly applied to the rig, which is an important basis for selecting power and checking capability of drilling equipment. Existing models cannot directly calculate the rig pulling load during the pull-back process. In this study, a model that takes into account the influence of the drill string and the soil pressure was developed to predict rig pulling load. The accuracy of the model is verified by comparison with existing models and field tests. The results show that pullback capability of rig should be determined by the maximum rig load instead of the maximum pull head load. For lighter high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes, using the mud with good lubrication function is the most effective to reduce the maximum rig load, however, for heavier steel pipes, the most effective way to reduce the maximum rig load is choosing pipe delivery method with less resistance. The field test proves that the model can predict the rig load accurately when installing pipes in water-rich unstable strata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM F1962-11 (1962) Standard guide for use of maxi-horizontal directional drilling for placement of polyethylene pipe or conduit under obstacles, including river crossings. ASTM F1962-11, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamert ME, Allouche EN (2002) Methods for estimating pipe pullback loads for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) crossings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 8(1):12–19, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:1(12)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert ME, Allouche EN, Moore ID (2004) Experimental investigation of pull loads and borehole pressures during horizontal directional drilling installations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 41(4):672–685, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/103-090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai L, Xu G, Polak MA, Knight MA (2010) Prediction model of pulling loads in horizontal directional drilling installations and its characteristic parameter sensitivity analysis. Journal of China University of Petroleum 34(6):114–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Chehab AG, Moore ID (2012) Analysis for long-lerm response of pipes installed using horizontal directional drilling. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering 138(4):432–440, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng E, Polak MA (2007) Theoretical model for calculating pulling loads for pipes in horizontal directional drilling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 22(5–6):633–643, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingarian GV, Vorabutr P (1983) Drilling and drilling fluids, updated textbook. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Drillpath T M (1996) Drillpath theory and user’s manual. Infrasoft L. L. C, Houston, TX, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscopipe (1993) Technical expertise: Application of driscopipe in directional drilling and river crossings. Technical Note (41):1–40

  • Guo Z, Liang Z (2018) Analysis of the pipeline pull-back load for horizontal directional drilling. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22(12):5133–5142, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0481-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Xie S, Ren L, Ren L, Dong C, Gong Y (2020) Pipeline pull-back load analysis by continuous beam theory. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 24(4):1307–1317, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1721-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huey DP, Hair JD, McLeod KB (1996) Installation loading and stress analysis involved with pipelines installed in horizontal directional drilling. No-Dig’ 96: North American society for trenchless technology conference, March 31–April 3, New Orleans, LA, USA, 37–60

  • Knight MA, Duyvestyn GM, Polak MA (2002) Horizontal directional drilling installation loads on polyethylene pipes. ISTT No-Dig

  • Brisbane, Australia Li S, Li X (2016) Analysis and measurement on pullback force of steel pipeline during horizontal directional crossing. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 50(4):714–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak MA (2005) Analysis of polyethylene pipe behaviour in horizontal directional drilling field tests. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 32(4):665–677, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/105-013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polak MA, Lasheen A (2002) Mechanical modeling for pipes in horizontal directional drilling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 16(Suppl. 1):47–55, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00020-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical Soil Mechanics, seventh ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2018YFC1802404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41672366), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 292018093). Meanwhile, great thanks also go to former researchers for their excellent works, which give great help for our academic study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, L., Wang, Y. & Wang, Z. Rig Load Prediction Model in Horizontal Directional Drilling within Water-Rich Unstable Strata. KSCE J Civ Eng 26, 556–568 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0088-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0088-8

Keywords

Navigation