Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Seismically Induced Longitudinal Strain in Pipelines Subjected to Incident Shear Wave

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

For buried pipelines, the longitudinal strain is the primary seismic design parameter. The strain can be calculated from a three dimensional (3D) time history analysis. However, performing a 3D analysis in practice can be prohibitive. The objective of the study is to provide guidelines for performing a simplified pseudo-static analysis that approximates the output of a 3D nonlinear analysis. A parametric study is performed to evaluate the degree of influence of numerous variables on the calculated longitudinal strain, the results of which are used to sculpture the guidelines. It is recommended to utilize the outputs from a one-dimensional site response analysis and the closed-form equations to calculate the axial and bending strains of pipelines subjected to a harmonic wave propagating at an incident angle to the longitudinal axis of the structure. To represent a transient earthquake motion as an equivalent harmonic motion, a procedure to extract the pulse that induces the maximum strain considering both the amplitude and the duration is presented. Using the proposed procedure, it is revealed that the reliability of the predicted longitudinal strain is acceptable for design purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALA (2001) Guideline for the design of buried steel pipe. American Society of Civil Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Lifeline Alliance, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ALA (2005) Seismic guidelines for water pipelines. National Institue of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Lifelines Alliance, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gerolymos N, Drosos V, Kourkoulis R, Georgarakos T, Gazetas G (2007) Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strong seismic shaking. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133(9):1067–1090, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:9(1067)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • API Specification 5L (2000) Specification for line pipe, 42nd edition. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyroudis SA, Pitilakis KD (2012) Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 35(4):1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS, Weir AG (2000) Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes. Proceedings of 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, January 30–February 4, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta TK (1999) Seismic response of buried pipelines: A state-of-the-art review. Nuclear Engineering and Design 192(2–3):271–284, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00113-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai AS, Papanikolaou VK, Lee DH (2011) Zeus NL — A system for inelastic analysis of structures, user’s manual. Mid-America Earthquake Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance — Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1, Comit Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium

  • Gantes CJ, Melissianos V (2013) Numerical analysis of buried steel pipelines. Proceedings of 2nd international Balkans conference on challenges of civil engineering, May 23–25, Tirana, Albania

  • Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, John I, Yao C (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 16(4): 247–293, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00051-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Musgrove M, Harmon J, Okan I, Groholski D, Phillips C, Park DH (2017) DEEPSOIL 7.0, user manual. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindy A, Novak M (1979) Earthquake response of underground pipelines. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 7(5):451–476, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290070506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honegger DG, Nyman DJ, Johnson ER, Cluff LS, Sorensen SP (2004) Trans-Alaska pipeline system performance in the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20(3):707–738, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1779239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak DY, Brandenberg SJ, Mikami A, Stewart JP (2015) Prediction equations for estimating shear-wave velocity from combined geotechnical and geomorphic indexes based on japanese data set. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105(4):1919–1930, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DH, Kim BH, Lee H, Kong JS (2009) Seismic behavior of a buried gas pipeline under earthquake excitations. Engineering Structures 31(5):1011–1023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’heureux JS, Long M (2017) Relationship between shear-wave velocity and geotechnical parameters for Norwegian clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 143(6):04017013, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luco JE, De Barros FCP (1994) Seismic response of a cylindrical shell embedded in a layered viscoelastic half-space. I: Formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 23(5):553–567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclaughlin P, O’rourke M (2009) Strain in pipe elbows due to wave propagation hazards. Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering conference (TCLEE) 2009, June 28–July 1, Oakland, CA, USA, 1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41050(357)37

  • Newmark NM (1967) Problem in wave propagation in soil and rock. Proceedings of international symposium on wave propagation and dynamic properties of earth matericals, August 23–25, Albuquerque, NM, USA

  • Park D, Sagong M, Kwak DY, Jeong CG (2009) Simulation of tunnel response under spatially varying ground motion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29(11–12):1417–1424, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power DV (1966) A survey of complaints of seismic-related damage to surface structures following the Salmon underground nuclear detonation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 56(6):1413–1428

    Google Scholar 

  • Psyrras N, Gerasimidis S, Kwon OS, Sextos AG (2018) Can a buried natural gas pipeline buckle locally during earthquake ground shaking? Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 116:511–529, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Railway Techincal Reasherch Institue (1999) Seismic design for railroad strctures and commentary. Railway Techincal Reasherch Institue, Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Saberi M, Behnamfar F, Vafaeian M (2013) A semi-analytical model for estimating seismic behavior of buried steel pipes at bend point under propagating waves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11(5):1373–1402, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9430-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi M, Halabian AM, Vafaian M (2011) Numerical analysis of buried steel pipelines under earthquake excitations. Proceedings of conference on Pan-Am CGS geotechnical conference, October 2–6, Toronto, Canada

  • St-John CM, Zahrah TF (1987) Aseismic design of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2(2):165–197, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(87)90011-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toprak S, Koc A, Cetin O, Nacaroglu E (2008) Assessment of buried pipeline response to earthquake loading by using GIS. Proceedings of 14th world conference of earthquake engineering, October 12–17, Beijing, China

  • Trombetti T, Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Pintucchi B, De Stefano M (2008) Numerical verification of the effectiveness of the “Alpha” method for the estimation of the maximum rotational elastic response of eccentric systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12(2):249–280, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701385374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff TF (1989) Pile capacity prediction using parameter functions. Conference of predicted and observed axial behavior of piles: Results of a pile prediction symposium, June 25, Evanston, IL, USA

  • Wong KC, Datta SK, Shah AH (1986) Three-dimensional motion of buried pipeline. I: Analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 112(12):1319–1337, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:12(1319)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-201900000000551) and by a grant (18SCIP-B146946-01) from Construction technology research program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duhee Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, SW., Kim, SJ. & Park, D. Estimation of Seismically Induced Longitudinal Strain in Pipelines Subjected to Incident Shear Wave. KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 2322–2332 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1415-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1415-1

Keywords

Navigation