Abstract
For buried pipelines, the longitudinal strain is the primary seismic design parameter. The strain can be calculated from a three dimensional (3D) time history analysis. However, performing a 3D analysis in practice can be prohibitive. The objective of the study is to provide guidelines for performing a simplified pseudo-static analysis that approximates the output of a 3D nonlinear analysis. A parametric study is performed to evaluate the degree of influence of numerous variables on the calculated longitudinal strain, the results of which are used to sculpture the guidelines. It is recommended to utilize the outputs from a one-dimensional site response analysis and the closed-form equations to calculate the axial and bending strains of pipelines subjected to a harmonic wave propagating at an incident angle to the longitudinal axis of the structure. To represent a transient earthquake motion as an equivalent harmonic motion, a procedure to extract the pulse that induces the maximum strain considering both the amplitude and the duration is presented. Using the proposed procedure, it is revealed that the reliability of the predicted longitudinal strain is acceptable for design purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALA (2001) Guideline for the design of buried steel pipe. American Society of Civil Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Lifeline Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
ALA (2005) Seismic guidelines for water pipelines. National Institue of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Lifelines Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
Anastasopoulos I, Gerolymos N, Drosos V, Kourkoulis R, Georgarakos T, Gazetas G (2007) Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strong seismic shaking. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133(9):1067–1090, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:9(1067)
API Specification 5L (2000) Specification for line pipe, 42nd edition. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, USA
Argyroudis SA, Pitilakis KD (2012) Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 35(4):1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004
Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS, Weir AG (2000) Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes. Proceedings of 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, January 30–February 4, Auckland, New Zealand
Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
Datta TK (1999) Seismic response of buried pipelines: A state-of-the-art review. Nuclear Engineering and Design 192(2–3):271–284, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00113-2
Elnashai AS, Papanikolaou VK, Lee DH (2011) Zeus NL — A system for inelastic analysis of structures, user’s manual. Mid-America Earthquake Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance — Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1, Comit Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium
Gantes CJ, Melissianos V (2013) Numerical analysis of buried steel pipelines. Proceedings of 2nd international Balkans conference on challenges of civil engineering, May 23–25, Tirana, Albania
Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, John I, Yao C (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 16(4): 247–293, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00051-7
Hashash YMA, Musgrove M, Harmon J, Okan I, Groholski D, Phillips C, Park DH (2017) DEEPSOIL 7.0, user manual. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
Hindy A, Novak M (1979) Earthquake response of underground pipelines. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 7(5):451–476, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290070506
Honegger DG, Nyman DJ, Johnson ER, Cluff LS, Sorensen SP (2004) Trans-Alaska pipeline system performance in the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20(3):707–738, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1779239
Kwak DY, Brandenberg SJ, Mikami A, Stewart JP (2015) Prediction equations for estimating shear-wave velocity from combined geotechnical and geomorphic indexes based on japanese data set. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105(4):1919–1930, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140326
Lee DH, Kim BH, Lee H, Kong JS (2009) Seismic behavior of a buried gas pipeline under earthquake excitations. Engineering Structures 31(5):1011–1023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.12.012
L’heureux JS, Long M (2017) Relationship between shear-wave velocity and geotechnical parameters for Norwegian clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 143(6):04017013, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001645
Luco JE, De Barros FCP (1994) Seismic response of a cylindrical shell embedded in a layered viscoelastic half-space. I: Formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 23(5):553–567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230507
Mclaughlin P, O’rourke M (2009) Strain in pipe elbows due to wave propagation hazards. Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering conference (TCLEE) 2009, June 28–July 1, Oakland, CA, USA, 1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41050(357)37
Newmark NM (1967) Problem in wave propagation in soil and rock. Proceedings of international symposium on wave propagation and dynamic properties of earth matericals, August 23–25, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Park D, Sagong M, Kwak DY, Jeong CG (2009) Simulation of tunnel response under spatially varying ground motion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29(11–12):1417–1424, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.05.005
Power DV (1966) A survey of complaints of seismic-related damage to surface structures following the Salmon underground nuclear detonation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 56(6):1413–1428
Psyrras N, Gerasimidis S, Kwon OS, Sextos AG (2018) Can a buried natural gas pipeline buckle locally during earthquake ground shaking? Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 116:511–529, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.027
Railway Techincal Reasherch Institue (1999) Seismic design for railroad strctures and commentary. Railway Techincal Reasherch Institue, Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan
Saberi M, Behnamfar F, Vafaeian M (2013) A semi-analytical model for estimating seismic behavior of buried steel pipes at bend point under propagating waves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11(5):1373–1402, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9430-y
Saberi M, Halabian AM, Vafaian M (2011) Numerical analysis of buried steel pipelines under earthquake excitations. Proceedings of conference on Pan-Am CGS geotechnical conference, October 2–6, Toronto, Canada
St-John CM, Zahrah TF (1987) Aseismic design of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2(2):165–197, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(87)90011-3
Toprak S, Koc A, Cetin O, Nacaroglu E (2008) Assessment of buried pipeline response to earthquake loading by using GIS. Proceedings of 14th world conference of earthquake engineering, October 12–17, Beijing, China
Trombetti T, Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Pintucchi B, De Stefano M (2008) Numerical verification of the effectiveness of the “Alpha” method for the estimation of the maximum rotational elastic response of eccentric systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12(2):249–280, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701385374
Wolff TF (1989) Pile capacity prediction using parameter functions. Conference of predicted and observed axial behavior of piles: Results of a pile prediction symposium, June 25, Evanston, IL, USA
Wong KC, Datta SK, Shah AH (1986) Three-dimensional motion of buried pipeline. I: Analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 112(12):1319–1337, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:12(1319)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-201900000000551) and by a grant (18SCIP-B146946-01) from Construction technology research program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, SW., Kim, SJ. & Park, D. Estimation of Seismically Induced Longitudinal Strain in Pipelines Subjected to Incident Shear Wave. KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 2322–2332 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1415-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1415-1