Abstract
Bayesian model updating technique has been widely investigated and utilized in the field of finite element model (FEM) updating for its advantages in system uncertainty quantification. Most existing studies focus on numerical and experimental models. More studies on large-scale civil infrastructures based on field monitoring are still required. A case study on Bayesian FEM updating of the Runyang Suspension Bridge (RSB), a long-span suspension bridge with a main span of 1,490 m, is carried out in this paper. The Bayesian updating method is utilized to update the initial FEM of RSB, aiming to make the numerical modal properties match the field monitoring results. Two stochastic sampling algorithms, i.e., the Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm and the Hybrid Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm, are respectively investigated to show their advantages and limitations in Bayesian updating. Subsequently, based on the experimentalsamples generated by the Latin hypercube sampling algorithm, a Kriging predictor is established as a surrogate model to reduce the computational burden of model updating. Results show that the HMC algorithm could guarantee much higher acceptance rate of the sampled chain than the MH algorithm especially when the updating step size is large. In addition, combined with the Kriging predictor, Bayesian model updating method could serve as an effective and efficient tool to calibrate the FEM of large-scale civil infrastructures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANSYS (1999) Ansys manuals release 5.6. ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA
Asadollahi P, Huang Y, Li J (2018) Bayesian finite element model updating and assessment of cable-stayed bridges using wireless sensor data. Sensors 18(9):3057, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093057
Au SK, Beck JL (1999) A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations. Structural Safety 21(2):135–158, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00014-4
Beck JL, Au SK (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using markov chain monte carlo simulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128(4):380–391, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380)
Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 124(4):455–461, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455)
Boulkaibet I, Mthembu L, Marwala T, Friswell M, Adhikari S (2017) Finite element model updating using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo techniques. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering 25(7): 1042–1070, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2016.1215446
Cheung SH, Beck JL (2009) Bayesian model updating using Hybrid Monte Carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with many uncertain parameters. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 135(4):243–255, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:4(243)
Ching JY, Chen YC (2007) Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo method for bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 133(7):816–832, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816)
Duane S, Kennedy AD, Pendleton BJ, Roweth D (1987) Hybrid Monte Carlo. Physics Letters B 195(2):216–222
Friswell M, Mottershead JE (2013) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, vol. 38. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany
Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57(1):97–109, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
Jang J, Smyth A (2017) Bayesian model updating of a full-scale finite element model with sensitivity-based clustering. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 24(11):e2004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2004
Jeong S, Murayama M, Yamamoto K (2005) Efficient optimization design method using kriging model. Journal of Aircraft 42(2):413–420, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6386
Karoumi R (1999) Some modeling aspects in the nonlinear finite element analysis of cable supported bridges. Computers & Structures 71(4):397–412, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00244-2
Katafygiotis LS, Lam HF, Papadimitriou C (2000) Treatment of unidentifiability in structural model updating. Advances in Structural Engineering 3(1):19–39, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/1369433001501996
Khodaparast HH, Mottershead JE, Badcock KJ (2011) Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the kriging predictor. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 25(4):1204–1226, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.009
Lam HF, Yang J, Au SK (2015) Bayesian model updating of a coupled-slab system using field test data utilizing an enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm. Engineering Structures 102:144–155, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.005
Lee JJ, Lee JW, Yi JH, Yun CB, Jung HY (2005) Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models. Journal of Sound and Vibration 280(3-5):555–578, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.003
Levin R, Lieven N (1998) Dynamic finite element model updating using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 12(1):91–120, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1996.0136
Li J, Spencer BF, Elnashai AS, Phillips BM (2011) Substructure hybrid simulation with multiple-support excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 138(7):867–876, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000394
Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Søndergaard J (2002) Dace: A matlab kriging toolbox, vol. 2. Citeseer, Retrieved August 8, 2017, http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/publication_details.php?id=1460
Mao JX, Wang H, Feng DM, Tao TY, Zheng WZ (2018) Investigation of dynamic properties of long-span cable-stayed bridges based on one-year monitoring data under normal operating condition. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 25(5):e2146, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2146
Mao JX, Wang H, Fu YG, Spencer Jr BF (2019) Automated modal identification using principal component and cluster analysis: Application to a long-span cable-stayed bridge. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 26(10):e2430, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2430
Mao JX, Wang H, Xun ZX, Zou ZQ (2017) Variability analysis on modal parameters of runyang bridge during typhoon masta. SMART Structures and Systems 19(6):653–663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.6.653
McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755
Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics 21(6):1087–1092, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114
Mottershead JE, Link M, Friswell MI (2011) The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 25(7):2275–2296, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.012
Pedram M, Esfandiari A, Khedmati MR (2016) Finite element model updating using strain-based power spectral density for damage detection. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 23(11):1314–1333, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1833
Peeters B, De Roeck G (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 13(6):855–878, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1999.1249
Ren WX, Chen HB (2010) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method. Engineering Structures 32(8):2455–2465, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.019
Schlune H, Plos M, Gylltoft K (2009) Improved bridge evaluation through finite element model updating using static and dynamic measurements. Engineering Structures 31(7):1477–1485, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.011
Simpson TW, Poplinski J, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations. Engineering with Computers 17(2):129–150, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007198
Spall JC (1998) Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 34(3):817–823, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/7.705889
Wan HP, Mao Z, Todd MD, Ren WX (2014) Analytical uncertainty quantification for modal frequencies with structural parameter uncertainty using a gaussian process metamodel. Engineering Structures 75:577–589, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.028
Wan HP, Ren WX (2016) Stochastic model updating utilizing bayesian approach and gaussian process model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 70:245–268, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.011
Wang H, Li AQ, Li J (2010) Progressive finite element model calibration of a long-span suspension bridge based on ambient vibration and static measurements. Engineering Structures 32(9):2546–2556, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.028
Yan WJ, Katafygiotis LS (2015) A novel bayesian approach for structural model updating utilizing statistical modal information from multiple setups. Structural Safety 52:260–271, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.06.004
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51722804 and 51978155), the National Ten Thousand Talent Program for Young Top-Notch Talents (W03070080), the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (BE2018120). The first author would like to acknowledge the support of Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (YBJJ1761) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice InnovationProgram of Jiangsu Province (KYCX17_0127).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, J., Wang, H. & Li, J. Bayesian Finite Element Model Updating of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge Utilizing Hybrid Monte Carlo Simulation and Kriging Predictor. KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 569–579 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0983-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0983-4