Abstract
According to Airport Council International, Juanda International Airport (JIA) is the second busiest airport in Indonesia. JIA has two terminals: The domestic terminal (T1) has an area of 62,700 m2, while the international terminal (T1) covers an area of 49,000 m2. Both T1 and T2 were designed to accommodate 12.5 million passengers per year; in 2015, the actual number of passengers passing through the terminals reached 17 million. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to find a solution to the terminals’ overcapacity (or congestion) problem by analyzing the factors affecting the efficiency of the existing terminals. This research uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a three-level process consisting of goals, criteria, and sub criteria. The main objective of this research is determining the factor that most affects the efficiency levels of T1 and T2. Three priority variables were identified - convenience, punctuality, and accessibility. The sub criteria include the processes that a passenger must go through when using the passenger terminal, including the security check point 1 (SCP I) and the security check point 2 (SCP II), check-in, walking time, and boarding lounge. The analysis results show that the factors that influence the efficiency of T1 were check-in process (32.7%), SCP I (32.4%), walking time and SCP II (13.2%), and boarding lounge (8.5%). The factors which influence the effectiveness of T2 were 28.1% for SCP I, 26.9% for check-in process, 17.9% for walking time I, 10.6% for SCP II, 9.9% for walking time II and 6.6% for boarding lounge. Thus, the factors affecting both terminals’ efficiency are the processes of SCP I and check-in process when passengers first access the terminal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bang J, Kim DH (2019) Estimation of incheon international airport capacity by using aircraft delay simulation model. Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 27(1):20–25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2019.27.1.020 (in Korean)
Castelli L, Pellegrini P (2011) An AHP analysis of air traffic managementwith target windows. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2):68–73, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.05.006
Catherine M, Gretchen BR (2014) Designing qualitative research, 6th edition. SAGE, London, UK, 143
Costa HG (1994) Seleão de parãmetros para a usinagem: Uma abordagemmulti-critério (Machining parameters selection problem: A multicriteria approach). ScD Thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Costa HG, Corréa PDS (2010) Construction of an AHP-based model to catch criteria weights in post-occupancy evaluation. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2:30–43, DOI: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v2i1.71
ICAO (2001) Assembly resolutions in force. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Montreal, Canada
James PT (2002) Educational research principles and practice. iUniverse, Lincoln, NE, USA, 75–87
Jeon JH, Song JH, Yoo SJ, Lee JN, Yoo KE (2015) A study on the transfer passenger quantity enhancement of incheon international airport by AHP analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 23(2):40–50, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2015.23.2.040 (in Korean)
Kwon TH (2008) Critical issues in applying multi-criteria analysis into feasibility studies of public projects. The Korea Association for Public Management, 22(3):31–51, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2008.22.3.002 (in Korean)
Lee JS (2016) Comparison of commercialization factors of smart grids technologies with AHPs. New & Renewable Energy 12(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.7849/ksnre.2016.9.12.3.95 (in Korean)
Lyneis (2000) System dynamics for market forecasting and structural analysis. System Dynamics Review, 16:3–25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(200021)16:1<3::AID-SDR183>3.0.CO;2-5
Mapsofworld (2015) Airports in Indonesia. Mapsofworld, Retrieved December 23, 2019, https://www.mapsofworld.com/international-airports/asia/indonesia.html
Méxas MP, Quelhas OLG, Costa HG (2012) Prioritization criteria for enterprise resource planning systems selection for civil construction companies: A multicriteria approach. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 39(8):855–866, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/l2012-071
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3):234–281, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1):9–26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Sherri LJ (2005) Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, USA, 99–102
Suryani E, Chuo SY, Chen CH (2010) Air passenger demand forecasting and passenger terminal capacity expansion: A system dynamics framework. Expert Systems with Application, 37(3):2324–2339, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.041
Transportation Research Board (1987) Measuring airport landside capacity. Special report 215, The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/11361
Tsai WH, Hsu W, Chou WC (2011) A gap analysis model for improving airport service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(10):1025–1040, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.611326
Wikipedia (2015) Juanda international airport. Retrieved December 18, 2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/
Zietsman D, Vanderschuren M (2014) Analytic hierarchy process assessment for potential multi-airport systems - The case of Cape Town. Journal of Air Transport Management 36:41–49, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.12.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S.U., Lee, J.D. Analyzing Factors that Influence the Efficiency of Airport Passenger Terminal by Using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) Method (Case Study of Juanda Airport — Surabaya, Indonesia). KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 3856–3865 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0880-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0880-x