Skip to main content
Log in

A New Probabilistic Framework for Structural System Fragility and Sensitivity Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concrete gravity dams are widely constructed owing to their advantages of low maintenance cost and relatively low risk of sudden failure. However, the structural failure rate has been reported to be higher than other dam types. Although various studies have been conducted to assess the structural fragility of concrete gravity dams, not enough emphasis was placed on system-level fragility and sensitivity analyses, which provide crucial information for mitigating dam failure. This study proposes a new probabilistic framework for system fragility and sensitivity analysis by employing a finite element model for concrete gravity dams. The proposed framework consists of four steps, namely, structural analysis modeling considering the realistic loading conditions, component fragility analysis employing finite element reliability analysis, system fragility analysis employing system reliability analysis, and system sensitivity analysis using the finite difference method, which require several numerical algorithms and computational techniques. The proposed framework is applied to a numerical example of a typical concrete gravity dam in South Korea, and the analysis is completed successfully. As a result, the example dam is found to be relatively more vulnerable to sliding and concrete overstress than ground overstress. In addition, it is revealed that the dam system is more likely to fail in the overflow part than in the non-overflow part. The most critical factor in preventing these failures is the concrete mass density, followed by the silt mass density and the concrete compressive strength. Based on these analysis results, it is confirmed that the proposed framework provides valuable information for risk-informed structural design and failure mitigation of concrete gravity dams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI 214R-02 (2002). Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete, 214R-02 American Concrete Institute, FarmingtonHills, MI, USAUSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altarejos-García, L., Escuder-Bueno, I., Serrano-Lombillo, A., and Membrillera-Ortuño, M. G. de (2012). “Methodology for estimating the probability of failure by sliding in concrete gravity dams in the context of risk analysis.” Structural Safety, Vol. 36, pp. 1–13, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghari, E., Taghipour, R., Bozorgnasab, M., and Moosavi, M. (2018). “Seismic analysis of concrete gravity dams considering foundation mass effect.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, pp. 1–9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0278-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstone, C., Westberg, M., and Jeppsson, J. (2009). “Structural assessment of a concrete dam based on uplift pressure monitoring.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 1, pp. 133–142, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2009)135:1(133).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Dam Association (1995). Dam safety guidelines, Canadian Dam Safety Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, J., Song, J., and Paulino, G. H. (2015). “Parameter sensitivity of system reliability using sequential compounding method.” Structural Safety, Vol. 55, pp. 26–36, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian, A. (2004). “First-and-second order reliability methods.” Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, Chap. 14, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203483930.ch14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emiroglu, M. E. (2008). “Influences on selection of the type of dam.” International Journal of Science & Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2007). Federal guidelines for dam safety, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganji, H. T. and Alembagheri, M. (2018). “Stability of monolithic gravity dam located on heterogeneous rock foundation.” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1777–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genz, A. (1992). “Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 141–149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1390838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariri-Ardebili, M. A. and Saouma, V. E. (2016). “Seismic fragility analysis of concrete dams: A state-of-the-art review.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 128, pp. 374–399, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukaas, T. (2003). Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering (Vol. 1), University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Ma, F. H., and Wu, S. H. (2017). “Nonlinear finite-element-based structural system failure probability analysis methodology for gravity dams considering correlated failure modes.” Journal of Central South University, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 178–189, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3419-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Large Dams (1995). Dam Failures − Statistical Analysis, ICOLD Bulletin 99, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, B. S. and Jung, W. Y. (2015). “Evaluation of seismic fragility of weir structures in South Korea.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/391569.

  • Kang, W.-H., Lee, Y.-J., Song, J., and Gencturk, B. (2012). “Further development of matrix-based system reliability method and applications to structural systems.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-cycle Design and Performance, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 441–457, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.539060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Sim, S.-H., Lee, J., Lee, Y.-J., and Kim, J.-M. (2017). “Flood fragility analysis for bridges with multiple failure modes.” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017696415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krounis, A. and Johan, F. (2011). “The influence of correlation between cohesion and friction angle on the probability of failure for sliding of concrete dams.” Proc. The 3rd International Forum on Risk Analysis: Dam safe, pp. 75–80, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11588-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J. and Cho, S. (2016). “SHM-based probabilistic fatigue life prediction for bridges based on FE model updating.” Sensors, Vol. 16, No. 3, p. 317, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s16030317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J., Kim, R. E., Suh, W., and Park, K. (2017). “Probabilistic fatigue life updating for railway bridges based on local inspection and repair.” Sensors, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 936, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lee, Y.-J., Kim, H., Sim, S.-H., and Kim, J.-M. (2016). “A new methodology development for flood fragility curve derivation considering structural deterioration for bridges.” Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 149–165, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.1.149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J. and Moon, D. S. (2014). “A new methodology of the development of seismic fragility curves.” Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 847–867, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.5.847.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J. and Song, J. (2014). “System reliability updating of fatigueinduced sequential failures.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 3, pp. 04013074, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J., Song, J., and Tuegel, E. J. (2008). “Finite element system reliability analysis of a wing torque box.” Proc. 10th AIAA Nondeterministic Approaches Conference, Schaumburg, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, R., Cheong, K. H., Bao, W., Wong, K. K. L., Wang, L., and Xie, N. G. (2018). “Multi-objective optimization of an arch dam shape under static loads using an evolutionary game method.” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 1061–1077.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, D.-S., Lee, Y.-J., and Lee, S. (2018). “Fragility analysis of space reinforced concrete frame structures with structural irregularity in plan.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 144, No. 8, p. 04018096, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Torres, A., Escuder-Bueno, I., Altarejos-García, L., and Serrano-Lombillo, A. (2016). “Building fragility curves of sliding failure of concrete gravity dams integrating natural and epistemic uncertainties.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 125, pp. 227–235, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NPDP (2016). NPDP Dam Incident Database, National Performance of Dams Program, Stanford, CA, https://doi.org/npdp.stanford.edu/dam_incidents [Accessed on June 8, 2016].

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyras, L., Royet, P., Deroo, L., Albert, R., Becue, J. P., Aigouy, S., Bourdarot, E., Loudiere, D., and Kovarik, J. B. (2008). “French recommendations for limit-state analytical review of gravity dam stability.” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, Nos. 9–10, pp. 1137–1164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2008.9693071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quecedo, M., Pastor, M., Herreros, M. I., Merodo, J. F., and Zhang, Q. (2005). “Comparison of two mathematical models for solving the dam break problem using the FEM method.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 194, No. 36, pp. 3984–4005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.011.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. P. and Seo, J. (2016). “Vulnerability sensitivity of curved precast-concrete I-girder bridges with various configurations subjected to multiple ground motions.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 04016118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, R. C. Le and Wium, J. A. (2012). “Assessment of the behaviour factor for the seismic design of reinforced concrete structural walls according to SANS 10160 - Part 4: Technical paper.” Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J. I., and Goodno, B. J. (2012). “Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 45, pp. 585–597, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J. and Linzell, D. G. (2013). “Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 52, pp. 642–653, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J. and Park, H. (2017). “Probabilistic seismic restoration cost estimation for transportation infrastructure portfolios with an emphasis on curved steel I-girder bridges.” Structural Safety, Vol. 65, pp. 27–34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. and Kang, W.-H. (2009). “System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method.” Structural Safety, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 148–156, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, H., Hu, J., and Wen, Z. (2011). “Service life predicting of dam systems with correlated failure modes.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 252–269, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, H. Z., Wu, Z. R., and Wen, Z. P. (2007). “Identification model for dam behavior based on wavelet network.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 438–448, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00499.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. and Ma, Z. (2016). “Application of probabilistic method to stability analysis of gravity dam foundation over multiple sliding planes.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4264627.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant (19SCIP-B138406-04) from smart civil infrastructure research program funded by ministry of land, infrastructure and transport (MOLIT) of Korea government and Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Joo Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J., Lee, YJ., Sim, SH. et al. A New Probabilistic Framework for Structural System Fragility and Sensitivity Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams. KSCE J Civ Eng 23, 3592–3605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2282-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2282-5

Keywords

Navigation